Diagnostic accuracy will be defined as (true positive + true negative)/all participants in the arm.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| EUS-FNA With ROSE | 91.3 | |
| EUS-FNB Without ROSE | 94.1 |
Last reviewed · How we verify
EUS FNB Versus FNA With On-Site Cytopathology in Solid Pancreatic Masses
NA trial testing EUS-FNA with ROSE in Fine Needle Aspiration in 40 participants. Terminated before completion.
| Lead sponsor | Johns Hopkins University |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Terminated |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | double |
| Primary purpose | diagnostic |
| Enrollment | 40 |
| Start date | 12 April 2018 |
| Primary completion | 26 July 2023 |
| Estimated completion | 26 July 2023 |
| Sites | 1 location across United States |
Johns Hopkins University
18 and older, any sex, with Fine Needle Aspiration or Pancreatic Mass. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Diagnostic accuracy will be defined as (true positive + true negative)/all participants in the arm.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| EUS-FNA With ROSE | 91.3 | |
| EUS-FNB Without ROSE | 94.1 |
Number of Specimens with Final Histopathological Diagnosis
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| EUS-FNA With ROSE | 35 | |
| EUS-FNB Without ROSE | 47 |
Number of Samples with Visible Histology Core Biopsy
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| EUS-FNA With ROSE | 3 | |
| EUS-FNB Without ROSE | 46 |
Median number of passes required for accurate diagnosis
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| EUS-FNA With ROSE | 2 | 1 – 3 |
| EUS-FNB Without ROSE | 1 | 1 – 1 |
Technical failure was defined as the inability to perform the procedure, including the need to change the needle
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| EUS-FNA With ROSE | 0 | |
| EUS-FNB Without ROSE | 0 |
The objective of this paired cohort study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) compared to EUS-fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) without ROSE. If EUS-FNB without ROSE is shown to be non-inferior to the current standard of care of EUS-FNA with ROSE in pancreatic lesions, this study has the potential to make EUS-guided tissue acquisition more economical (with elimination for the need for cytopathology staff onsite) as well as provide core histological specimen without sacrificing the overall diagnostic yield.
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
Trials by the same sponsor.
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03485924.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing