Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03485924

EUS FNB Versus FNA With On-Site Cytopathology in Solid Pancreatic Masses

Terminated NA Results posted Last updated 19 September 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing EUS-FNA with ROSE in Fine Needle Aspiration in 40 participants. Terminated before completion.

Timeline
12 April 2018
Primary endpoint
26 July 2023
26 July 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsorJohns Hopkins University
PhaseNA
StatusTerminated
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposediagnostic
Enrollment40
Start date12 April 2018
Primary completion26 July 2023
Estimated completion26 July 2023
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Johns Hopkins University

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Fine Needle Aspiration or Pancreatic Mass. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-needle Biopsy (FNB) Sampling Without Rapid Onsite Evaluation (ROSE) and the Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) With ROSE in Pancreatic Mass Lesions Primary · 6 months from the initial biopsy

Diagnostic accuracy will be defined as (true positive + true negative)/all participants in the arm.

GroupValue95% CI
EUS-FNA With ROSE91.3
EUS-FNB Without ROSE94.1
Specimen Adequacy Secondary · Post-procedure one week

Number of Specimens with Final Histopathological Diagnosis

GroupValue95% CI
EUS-FNA With ROSE35
EUS-FNB Without ROSE47
Number of Histology Cores Obtained Secondary · Post-procedure one week

Number of Samples with Visible Histology Core Biopsy

GroupValue95% CI
EUS-FNA With ROSE3
EUS-FNB Without ROSE46
Median Number of Passes Secondary · 6 months from the initial biopsy

Median number of passes required for accurate diagnosis

GroupValue95% CI
EUS-FNA With ROSE21 – 3
EUS-FNB Without ROSE11 – 1
Number of Technical Failures Secondary · After the procedure, an average of 1 hour

Technical failure was defined as the inability to perform the procedure, including the need to change the needle

GroupValue95% CI
EUS-FNA With ROSE0
EUS-FNB Without ROSE0

Sponsor's own description

The objective of this paired cohort study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) compared to EUS-fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) without ROSE. If EUS-FNB without ROSE is shown to be non-inferior to the current standard of care of EUS-FNA with ROSE in pancreatic lesions, this study has the potential to make EUS-guided tissue acquisition more economical (with elimination for the need for cytopathology staff onsite) as well as provide core histological specimen without sacrificing the overall diagnostic yield.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other Johns Hopkins University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03485924.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing