Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03468998

The Influence of Bone Allograft Particle Sizes on the Quantity and Quality of New Bone Formation in Grafted Extraction Sockets and Edentulous Ridges

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 6 March 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Socket Grafting with small particle allograft in Alveolar Ridge Augmentation in 37 participants. Completed in 15 December 2022.

Timeline
8 March 2017
Primary endpoint
30 March 2022
15 December 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment37
Start date8 March 2017
Primary completion30 March 2022
Estimated completion15 December 2022
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Who can join

Adults 18 to 99, any sex, with Alveolar Ridge Augmentation or Alveolar Ridge Preservation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

New Bone Formation (in %) With the Use of Small vs. Large Particle Bone Allografts Primary · 3 months following socket preservation and 6 months following ridge augmentation

Compare histomorphometric amount of new bone formation (in %) between small and large particle bone allografts following ridge preservation and ridge augmentation procedures using core biopsies harvested at time of dental implant placement.

GroupValue95% CI
Ridge Preservation With Small Particle Allograft17.3± 12.8
Ridge Preservation With Large Particle Allograft25.9± 9.5
Ridge Augmentation With Small Particle Allograft41.0± 10.1
Ridge Augmentation With Large Particle Allograft31.4± 14.8
Radiographic Ridge Dimensional Changes (in mm) as a Result of Ridge Preservation and Ridge Augmentation Using Small vs. Large Particle Allograft Secondary · from time of grafting until implant placement (3 months following ridge preservation and 6 months following ridge augmentation)

Using cone beam computed tomography and implant planning software, the bucco-lingual ridge width is measured (in mm) relative to a fixed digital reference and compared between the 2 bone particle groups

GroupValue95% CI
Ridge Preservation With Small Particle Allograft1.1± 0.7
Ridge Preservation With Large Particle Allograft0.8± 0.5
Ridge Augmentation With Small Particle Allograft3.7± 1.3
Ridge Augmentation With Large Particle Allograft5.1± 1.7

Sponsor's own description

This study will evaluate the effect of allograft bone particle size on the bone quantity and quality following socket grafting and lateral ridge augmentation in preparation for endosseous implant placement. Pre (baseline)- and post-grafting (3 months for sockets and 6 months for edentulous ridges) clinical as well as 2- and 3-dimensional radiographic measurements will be used to evaluate the differences between sites grafted with small vs. large particle sized bone allografts. Histological analysis will be performed at time of surgical re-entry of grafted sites to place the dental implants, and assessed for differences in new bone formation between the 2 types of grafts.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of Alabama at Birmingham trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03468998.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing