Adults 18 to 99, any sex, with Alveolar Ridge Augmentation or Alveolar Ridge Preservation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
New Bone Formation (in %) With the Use of Small vs. Large Particle Bone AllograftsPrimary· 3 months following socket preservation and 6 months following ridge augmentation
Compare histomorphometric amount of new bone formation (in %) between small and large particle bone allografts following ridge preservation and ridge augmentation procedures using core biopsies harvested at time of dental implant placement.
Group
Value
95% CI
Ridge Preservation With Small Particle Allograft
17.3
± 12.8
Ridge Preservation With Large Particle Allograft
25.9
± 9.5
Ridge Augmentation With Small Particle Allograft
41.0
± 10.1
Ridge Augmentation With Large Particle Allograft
31.4
± 14.8
Radiographic Ridge Dimensional Changes (in mm) as a Result of Ridge Preservation and Ridge Augmentation Using Small vs. Large Particle AllograftSecondary· from time of grafting until implant placement (3 months following ridge preservation and 6 months following ridge augmentation)
Using cone beam computed tomography and implant planning software, the bucco-lingual ridge width is measured (in mm) relative to a fixed digital reference and compared between the 2 bone particle groups
Group
Value
95% CI
Ridge Preservation With Small Particle Allograft
1.1
± 0.7
Ridge Preservation With Large Particle Allograft
0.8
± 0.5
Ridge Augmentation With Small Particle Allograft
3.7
± 1.3
Ridge Augmentation With Large Particle Allograft
5.1
± 1.7
Sponsor's own description
This study will evaluate the effect of allograft bone particle size on the bone quantity and quality following socket grafting and lateral ridge augmentation in preparation for endosseous implant placement.
Pre (baseline)- and post-grafting (3 months for sockets and 6 months for edentulous ridges) clinical as well as 2- and 3-dimensional radiographic measurements will be used to evaluate the differences between sites grafted with small vs. large particle sized bone allografts.
Histological analysis will be performed at time of surgical re-entry of grafted sites to place the dental implants, and assessed for differences in new bone formation between the 2 types of grafts.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Other recruiting trials for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT06783660 — PeptiCol EZgraft in the Extraction Socket Preservation Process After Tooth Extraction
· NA
· recruiting
Other University of Alabama at Birmingham trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT04922229 — Comparative Effectiveness in the Management of Irreversible Pulpitis
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT05060380 — Feasibility of a Novel Resistance Exercise in Individuals With Osteoporosis
· NA
· withdrawn
NCT04768777 — Behavioral Intervention for Physical Activity and Sexual Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06320951 — VITAL-IMPACT: Improving Cardiometabolic Health in Black Individuals Through Therapeutic Augmentation of Cyclic Guanosine
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07564934 — Leveraging Extended Reality Exergaming and Telehealth to Improve Physical Activity and Health in Children With Disabilit
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of Alabama at Birmingham
Last refreshed: 6 March 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03468998.