Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03382041

Carbon Fiber Implants

Terminated NA Results posted Last updated 25 July 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Carbon Fiber Implant in Tibial Shaft Fractures in 20 participants. Terminated before completion.

Timeline
23 May 2017
Primary endpoint
31 March 2020
31 March 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham
PhaseNA
StatusTerminated
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment20
Start date23 May 2017
Primary completion31 March 2020
Estimated completion31 March 2021
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Tibial Shaft Fractures. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

The Number of Participants Identified With Fracture Healing Primary · From baseline through 6 weeks.

Will assess radiographically the fracture healing for patients treated with Carbon Fiber and Titanium Implants.

GroupValue95% CI
Carbon Fiber Implant1
Titanium Implant1
The Number of Participants Identified With Fracture Healing Primary · From baseline through 3 months.

Will assess radiographically the fracture healing for patients treated with Carbon Fiber and Titanium Implants.

GroupValue95% CI
Carbon Fiber Implant1
Titanium Implant2
Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA). Secondary · 6 months

The SMFA will be administered to patients at 6 months following injury. The scores of dysfunction are calculated by summing up the responses to the items and then transforming the scores according to the formula. This transformation formula gives the final scores which ranged from 0-100. The higher scores indicate poorer function.

GroupValue95% CI
Carbon Fiber Implant31.53± 20.55
Titanium Implant38.56± 32.46
Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA) Score. Secondary · 6 months

Patient reported levels of function and satisfaction with the fixation method and overall treatment. The SMFA will be administered to patients at 6 months following injury. The scores of bother are calculated by summing up the responses to the items and then transforming the scores according to the formula. This transformation formula gives the final scores which ranged from 0-100. The higher scores indicate poorer function.

GroupValue95% CI
Carbon Fiber Implant32.39± 22.60
Titanium Implant49.24± 46.71
Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA). Secondary · 12 months.

Patient reported levels of function and satisfaction with the fixation method and overall treatment. The Short Form Musculoskeletal Assessment (SMFA) will be administered to patients at 12 months following injury. The scores of dysfunction are calculated by summing up the responses to the items and then transforming the scores according to the formula. This transformation formula gives the final scores which ranged from 0-100. The higher scores indicate poorer function.

GroupValue95% CI
Carbon Fiber Implant29.85± 28.35
Titanium Implant31.09± 27.85
Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA) Score. Secondary · 12 months.

Patient reported levels of function and satisfaction with the fixation method and overall treatment. The Short Form Musculoskeletal Assessment (SMFA) will be administered to patients at 12 months following injury. The scores of bother are calculated by summing up the responses to the items and then transforming the scores according to the formula. This transformation formula gives the final scores which ranged from 0-100. The higher scores indicate poorer function.

GroupValue95% CI
Carbon Fiber Implant34.09± 32.06
Titanium Implant37.88± 36.46
Veterans Rand Health Survey (VR-12) Secondary · 6 weeks.

The Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey is a multipurpose, self-administered generic measure health status. It was developed to measure health-related quality of life, estimate disease burden and compare disease-specific benchmarks across populations. The VR-12 items measure eight health domains: general health perceptions, physical functioning and role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. The instrument produces a physical health and mental health. Assesses how much physical health has changed over a period of t

GroupValue95% CI
Carbon Fiber Implant31.63± 3.72
Titanium Implant25.53± 8.42
Veterans Rand Health Survey (VR-12) Secondary · 3 months

The Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey is a multipurpose, self-administered generic measure health status. It was developed to measure health-related quality of life, estimate disease burden and compare disease-specific benchmarks across populations. The VR-12 items measure 8 health domains: general health perceptions, physical functioning and role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. Assesses how much physical health has changed over a period of time. The VR instruments use a nine-point ordinal response choices

GroupValue95% CI
Carbon Fiber Implant48.03± 15.46
Titanium Implant44.90± 1.95
Veterans Rand Health Survey (VR-12) Secondary · 6 months

The Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey is a multipurpose, self-administered generic measure health status. It was developed to measure health-related quality of life, estimate disease burden and compare disease-specific benchmarks across populations. The VR-12 items measure eight health domains: general health perceptions, physical functioning and role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. Assesses how much physical health has changed over a period of time. The VR instruments use a nine-point ordinal response cho

GroupValue95% CI
Carbon Fiber Implant36.03± 15.24
Titanium Implant38.20± 20.92
Veterans Rand Health Survey (VR-12) Secondary · 12 months

The Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey is a multipurpose, self-administered generic measure health status. It was developed to measure health-related quality of life, estimate disease burden and compare disease-specific benchmarks across populations. The VR-12 items measure eight health domains: general health perceptions, physical functioning and role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. Assesses how much physical health has changed over a period of time. The VR instruments use a nine-point ordinal response cho

GroupValue95% CI
Carbon Fiber Implant41.63± 16.87
Titanium Implant47.83± 19.12
Veterans Rand Health Survey (VR-12) Secondary · 18 months

The Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey is a multipurpose, self-administered generic measure health status. It was developed to measure health-related quality of life, estimate disease burden and compare disease-specific benchmarks across populations. The VR-12 items measure eight health domains: general health perceptions, physical functioning and role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. Assesses how much physical health has changed over a period of time. The VR instruments use a nine-point ordinal response cho

GroupValue95% CI
Carbon Fiber Implant39.93± 10.75
Titanium Implant40.63± 24.31
Veterans Rand Health Survey (VR-12) Secondary · 6 weeks

The Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey is a multipurpose, self-administered generic measure health status. It was developed to measure health-related quality of life, estimate disease burden and compare disease-specific benchmarks across populations. The VR-12 items measure eight health domains: general health perceptions, physical functioning and role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. Assesses how much physical health has changed over a period of time. The VR instruments use a nine-point ordinal response cho

GroupValue95% CI
Carbon Fiber Implant41.08± 6.61
Titanium Implant43.07± 5.12

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Baseline through 12 months. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Carbon Fiber Implant
Serious: 1/3 (33%)
Deaths: 0/3
Titanium Implant
Serious: 0/4 (0%)
Deaths: 0/4

Serious adverse events (3 terms)

ReactionSystemCarbon Fiber ImplantTitanium Implant
Right tibia malunionSurgical and medical procedures
Fracture-left proximal tibial plateauSurgical and medical procedures
Sepsis secondary to hardware infectionInfections and infestations

Most-reported serious reactions: Right tibia malunion, Fracture-left proximal tibial plateau, Sepsis secondary to hardware infection.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03382041 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The investigators will compare intramedullary nailing of open and closed tibia shaft fractures with carbon fiber implant versus titanium implant in a Level I trauma setting.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other University of Alabama at Birmingham trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03382041.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing