Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03317184: HAPERPACT

Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Periumbilical Versus Pfannenstiel Incision

Status unknown NA Last updated 14 May 2018
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Periumbilical incision in Donor Nephrectomy in 52 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 November 2017
Primary endpoint
1 February 2020
1 June 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity Hospital Heidelberg
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment52
Start date1 November 2017
Primary completion1 February 2020
Estimated completion1 June 2020
Sites1 location across Germany

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University Hospital Heidelberg

Who can join

20 and older, any sex, with Donor Nephrectomy. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Despite efforts to optimize the transplantation of deceased donor kidneys, the number of available kidneys continues to fall short of the demand. Living donor kidneys have been used to overcome this shortage. Graft and patient survival is significantly higher following living donor kidney transplantation compared with deceased donor kidney transplantation. Open donor nephrectomy was the universal technique prior to the advent of laparoscopic techniques. Laparoscopic approaches have definite advantages over open surgery in terms of blood loss, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, duration of hospital stay, and convalescence. There is some controversy regarding longer warm ischemia time, longer operative time, and increased bleeding with laparoscopic nephrectomy compared with hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (HALDN). HALDN attempted to reduce warm ischemia time by using the hand port to extract the kidney instantly after dividing the blood vessels. This technique also offers tactile feedback, better manual control of bleeding, a relatively shorter learning curve, less kidney traction, faster kidney removal, and shorter warm ischemic periods. HALDN is often performed using periumbilical and Pfannenstiel incisions for hand-assisted port placement. Pfannenstiel incisions improve wound complications such as incisional hernia, cosmetic issues, and wound dehiscence. However, duration of surgery, postoperative pain score, and length of hospital stay are significantly lower in donors with periumbilical incisions.To the best of our knowledge, these two types of incision have not been compared in a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing HALDN. Our objective is to compare the results of Pfannenstiel incision (intervention group) with periumbilical incision (control group). The return to normal physical activity will be evaluated in a clinical randomized trial using an expertise-based design.

Publications & conference data

2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Hand-Assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy PERiumbilical versus Pfannenstiel incision and return to normal physical ACTivity (HAPERPACT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Kulu Y, Müller-Stich BP, Ghamarnejad O, Khajeh E, et al · · 2018 · cited 1× · PMID 30005640 · DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2775-4
  2. Abstracts DGAV
    · 2019

Verify or expand the search:

Other University Hospital Heidelberg trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03317184.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing