Adults 21 to 90, any sex, with Total Knee Replacement or Total Knee Arthroplasty. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Average Knee Pain While WalkingPrimary· Postoperative Day 0 to 28 (first 4 weeks following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
All subjects were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average pain intensity while walking during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." For each subject, the mean score for each diary period was calculated and a mean of all four diary periods was calculated (weeks 1-4). The mean group scores for weeks 1-4 are reported.
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
3.70
± 1.97
Control Group
4.14
± 1.49
Number of Subjects That Experienced at Least One Study-Related Adverse EventPrimary· 30 months (from when the first Treatment Group subject enrolled to when the last Treatment Group subject completed the study)
At each study visit following the baseline assessment at Visit 1, subjects were questioned if any changes in their medical status or condition has occurred since their previous visit. If the subject experienced a change that was an adverse event, an Adverse Event Form was completed by the site. The number of Treatment Group subjects that experienced at least one study-related adverse event is reported here.
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
8
Average Knee Pain Over the Last 24 HoursSecondary· Postoperative Day 0 to 28 (first 4 weeks following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA))
All subjects were asked to complete daily diaries to track their average pain intensity during the past 24 hours over a 7-day period on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The average score for each diary period was calculated across subjects, and the mean score for weeks 1-4 is reported.
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
3.24
± 1.52
Control Group
4.32
± 1.34
Average Knee Pain at RestSecondary· Postoperative Day 0 to 28 (first 4 weeks following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA))
All subjects were asked to complete daily diaries to track their average pain intensity at rest during the past 24 hours over a 7-day period on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The average score for each diary period was calculated across subjects, and the mean score for weeks 1-4 is reported.
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
2.86
± 1.23
Control Group
3.48
± 1.33
Pain Right Now as Measured by the Brief Pain InventorySecondary· Baseline (Visit 2a/2b), Visit 3 (Day of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)), Visit 4 (in-hospital), Visit 6 (2-weeks post TKA), and Visit 8 (4-weeks post TKA)
Subjects were asked to rate their pain right now on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The median score for each time point is reported. Baseline is considered Visit 2a (Lead Placement) for Treatment Group subjects and Visit 2b for Control Group subjects. For Treatment Group subjects for Visits 3, 4, 6, and 8, pain right now was assessed while peripheral nerve stimulation was on for at least one Lead. For Visit 4, the score reported during the last in-hospital day was used.
Subjects recorded the amount/type of analgesics used in daily diaries. Narcotic usage was converted into morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Diaries were collected at various visits and were translated into post-operative days. The average MME was calculated for each subject for the first 28 days (4 weeks) following surgery, and the median of these averages across subjects was determined. If subjects had ceased opioid use (per the Recovery Milestones log), then missing scores following the date of opioid cessation were replaced with 0 MME. If diary entries were missing but the subject had no
Visit 5 (1-week Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
29.9
3.2 – 49.3
Control Group
31.4
0.0 – 107.1
Visit 6 (2-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
21.4
2.1 – 31.1
Control Group
22.5
0.0 – 88.8
Visit 7 (3-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
13.6
1.1 – 20.0
Control Group
17.1
0.0 – 69.6
Visit 8 (4-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
11.4
0.0 – 20.7
Control Group
2.9
0.0 – 47.1
Average Across Visits 5-8
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
19.1
2.1 – 26.8
Control Group
16.8
0.13 – 75.0
Number of Subjects That Experienced at Least One Opioid-Related Side EffectSecondary· Baseline (Visit 2a/2b), Visits 4-11 (in-hospital days through 12-months post-Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA))
Throughout the study, subjects were asked if they experienced any side effects related to opioid pain medications. The occurrences of these side effects were recorded and were not considered Adverse Events. The number of subjects that experienced at least one opioid-related side effect at each visit is reported. Baseline is considered Visit 2a (Lead Placement) for Treatment Group subjects and Visit 2b for Control Group subjects.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
0
Control Group
0
Visit 4 (In-Hospital)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
3
Control Group
7
Visit 5 (1-week Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
3
Control Group
9
Visit 6 (2-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
3
Control Group
8
Visit 7 (3-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
2
Control Group
6
Visit 8 (4-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
1
Control Group
4
Visit 9 (2-months Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
0
Control Group
0
Visit 10 (3-months Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
0
Control Group
0
Timed Up and Go (TUG) TestSecondary· Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 4 (In-Hospital), Visit 6 (2-weeks Post-Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)), Visit 8 (4-weeks Post-TKA)
Subjects began this test from a seated position in a standard chair and were timed while they stood up, walked to a marked point 10 feet away (at a normal, safe pace), returned to the chair, and sat down. Timed Up and Go (TUG) test times are expected to be greater immediately after surgery as compared to baseline.
Time at Visit 1 (Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
12.44
4.82 – 13.7
Control Group
10.25
7 – 26.24
Time at Visit 4 (In-Hospital)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
41.80
11.13 – 141.32
Control Group
42.22
13.81 – 82.37
Time at Visit 6 (2-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
14.28
7.63 – 32.36
Control Group
15.93
7.39 – 56.0
Time at Visit 8 (4-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
10.68
6.59 – 17.07
Control Group
10.38
6.9 – 40.68
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Secondary· Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 6 (2-weeks Post-Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)), Visit 8 (4-weeks post-TKA)
The total distance that a subject could walk in 6 minutes was recorded, and subjects unable to walk at all were given a score of 0 meters. The median distance was then determined across subjects. 6 Minute Walk Test distances are expected to be reduced immediately after surgery as compared to baseline.
Visit 1 (Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
458.5
320.0 – 555.0
Control Group
351.3
0 – 504.0
Visit 6 (2-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
280.0
150.0 – 504.7
Control Group
281.0
0 – 680.2
Visit 8 (4-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
410.0
270.0 – 693.0
Control Group
329.0
0 – 518.9
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)Secondary· Visit 1 (Baseline), Visit 3 (Day of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)), Visit 6 (2-weeks post-TKA), Visit 8 (4-weeks post-TKA), Visit 10 (3-months post-TKA), and Visit 11 (12-months post-TKA)
The Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire consists of 24 items that evaluate pain, stiffness, and physical functional disability. Each item is scored on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater pain, stiffness, and disability. For each subject, the scores from each of the 24 items were summed to calculate the subject's total score, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 240. The mean total score was then calculated across subjects for each time point.
Visit 1 (Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
87.00
± 30.34
Control Group
111.31
± 38.78
Visit 3 (Day of TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
68.71
± 47.87
Control Group
99.23
± 51.25
Visit 6 (2-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
58.57
± 33.24
Control Group
81.13
± 38.98
Visit 8 (4-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
40.29
± 26.56
Control Group
51.94
± 30.83
Visit 10 (3-months Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
22.86
± 22.13
Control Group
29.38
± 21.05
Visit 11 (12-months Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
4.83
± 4.36
Control Group
12.79
± 20
Number of Subjects Reporting Meaningful Improvement, Minimal or No Change, or Meaningful Worsening on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) SurveySecondary· Visits 3-11 (Day of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) through 12-months post-TKA)
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) asks subjects to rate their improvement with treatment on a 7-point scale ranging from "very much worse" to "very much improved" as compared to before their knee replacement surgery. The subjects combine all the components of their experience into one overall score. Ratings of Much- or Very Much Improved are considered "Meaningful Improvements"; similarly, ratings of Much- or Very Much Worse are categorized as "Meaningfully Worse." Ratings of Minimally Improved, No Change, or Minimally Worse are considered "Minimal or No Change."
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) questionnaire has 13 questions that assess rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Subjects are asked to think back on painful experiences in the past and reflect on how often they had specific thoughts or feelings. Each of the 13 questions is scored on a 5-point scale where 0 represents "not at all," and 4 represents "all the time." The scores from each question were summed for each subject to provide a total PCS score, with a possible range from 0 to 52 with higher scores indicating a greater tendency to catastrophize pain (i.e. a higher score indica
Visit 1 (Baseline)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
7
0 – 13
Control Group
7
0 – 34
Visit 8 (4-weeks Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
6
0 – 14
Control Group
4
0 – 19
Visit 10 (3-months Post-TKA)
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment Group
1
0 – 13
Control Group
0
0 – 15
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through the 12-month follow up visit. The total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant..
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Treatment Group
Serious: 2/18 (11%)
Deaths: 0/18
Control Group
Serious: 3/23 (13%)
Deaths: 0/23
Serious adverse events (6 terms)
Reaction
System
Treatment Group
Control Group
Prostate Cancer
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
—
—
Acute Myopericarditis
Cardiac disorders
—
—
Pain at TKA Surgical Site
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
—
—
Adverse Drug Reaction During TKA
Surgical and medical procedures
—
—
Acute Pancreatitis and Gall Stones
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
Sepsis due to Urinary Tract Infection
Infections and infestations
—
—
Other adverse events (29 terms — click to expand)
Reaction
System
Treatment Group
Control Group
Skin irritation or bruising at pad and/or Lead exit site
The purpose of this study is to determine if electrical stimulation (small levels of electricity) in addition to the standard of care can safely and effectively reduce pain following total knee replacement more than the standard of care, alone. This study involves a device called the SPRINT Beta System. The SPRINT Beta System delivers mild electrical stimulation to nerves in the leg that received the knee replacement. The SPRINT Beta System includes a small wire (called a "lead") that is placed through the skin in the upper leg. It also includes a device worn on the body that delivers stimulation (called the SPRINT Beta Stimulator). About half the subjects in this study will receive the SPRINT Beta system (treatment group) and half will not (control group). Both groups will receive the standard of care.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Other recruiting trials for Total Knee Replacement
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT06929871 — Mako Cementless TKA vs Mako Cemented TKA
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07120191 — An Open Label Data Collection Study of My Connect Post-Op, a Post-Operative Communication Tool
· recruiting
NCT06578936 — The Effect of Abdominal Massage and Warm Application on Excretory Activity in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07275983 — Total Knee Replacement Under Spinal Anesthesia, Comparison of Postoperative Recovery Versus General Anesthesia
· recruiting
NCT06269770 — Tapentadol vs Tramadol in Total Knee Arthroplasty
· Phase 4
· recruiting
Other SPR Therapeutics, Inc. trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT04341948 — Treatment of Post-Operative Pain Following Orthopedic Surgery With SPRINT® Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System
· NA
· completed
NCT03783689 — The SNAP Trial: SPRINT® Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Neuropathic Post-Amputation Pain
· NA
· terminated
NCT03179202 — Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Back Pain Using Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)
· NA
· completed
NCT02468934 — Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Using the SPRINT System
· NA
· completed
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by SPR Therapeutics, Inc.
Last refreshed: 12 May 2021
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03286543.