Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03188042

A Study Using Transorbital Alternating Current Stimulation for People With Glaucoma

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 9 February 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing rtACS Stimulation in Glaucoma in 18 participants. Completed in 20 October 2022.

Timeline
14 December 2017
Primary endpoint
20 October 2022
20 October 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorNYU Langone Health
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment18
Start date14 December 2017
Primary completion20 October 2022
Estimated completion20 October 2022
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

NYU Langone Health — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 50 to 70, any sex, with Glaucoma. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Change in Peripapillary RNFL Thickness Primary · Baseline, Week 4

Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness (μm) measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

GroupValue95% CI
rtACS Stimulation Group-0.13± 2.3
Sham Intervention Group-1.8± 3.91
Change in Macular Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Primary · Baseline, Week 4

Macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (μm) measured using OCT.

GroupValue95% CI
rtACS Stimulation Group-0.13± 0.99
Sham Intervention Group0.3± 4.52
Percentage Change in ON Head Cup-to-Disc Ratio Primary · Baseline, Week 4

Percentage change in optic nerve (ON) head cup-to-disc ratio measured using OCT.

GroupValue95% CI
rtACS Stimulation Group0± 0.01
Sham Intervention Group0.01± 0.01
Change in Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer Score Primary · Baseline, Week 4

The Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer assesses the mean deviation (dB), a measure of visual field sensitivity through threshold testing. dBs tested by the Humphrey analyzer range between 0 and 50 dB (0 is the brightest and 50 is the dimmest). A value of 0 means the patient could not see the brightest target, and a 50 means the dimmest target was seen. Most values are around 30 dB, and any numbers below this range imply a possible visual field defect.

GroupValue95% CI
rtACS Stimulation Group0.86± 6.27
Sham Intervention Group2.89± 9.65
Change in Score on Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H), Short Form 3.1 Primary · Baseline, Week 4

The LIFE-H short form 3.1 is a 77-item questionnaire developed to measure: (1) how a respondent accomplishes regular activities and social roles and (2) respondent's satisfaction with how regular activities and social roles are accomplished. The LIFE-H total score is obtained by summing the scores on each item and then dividing by the number of items. The LIFE-H score ranges from 0 to 9, where a score of 0 indicates total handicap or total disruption in participation and a score of 9 means an optimal level of participation.

GroupValue95% CI
rtACS Stimulation Group0.000137± 0.165273
Sham Intervention Group-0.089842± 0.150235
Change in Minnesota Low Vision Reading Test (MNRead): Reading Acuity Score Primary · Baseline, Week 4

An estimate of reading acuity is given by the smallest print size at which the patient can read the entire sentence without making significant errors. This method measures acuity to the nearest 0.1 logMAR. Each sentence in the MNRead Reading Acuity chart has 60 characters, which corresponds to 10 standard length words, assuming a standard word length of 6 characters (including a space). Reading acuity is calculated as follows: Reading acuity = size of smallest sentence read + 0.01 x number of errors.

GroupValue95% CI
rtACS Stimulation Group-0.02857± 0.108233
Sham Intervention Group0.013333± 0.074498
Change in Score on National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Primary · Baseline, Week 4

National Eye Institute VFQ-39 measures health-related quality of life in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision, and composite score. For each domain: the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. The total score is the average of the domain scores.

GroupValue95% CI
rtACS Stimulation Group3.52± 2.1405453
Sham Intervention Group0.95± 0.089
Change in Score on 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Primary · Baseline, Week 4

The SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported questionnaire that covers eight health domains: physical functioning (10 items), bodily pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), role limitations due to personal or emotional problems (4 items), emotional well-being (5 items), social functioning (2 items), energy/fatigue (4 items), and general health perceptions (5 items). Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state. The total score is the average of the domain scores.

GroupValue95% CI
rtACS Stimulation Group23.14± 5.3030631
Sham Intervention Group17.18± 0.1888264
VEP-Measured Amplitude (15% Contrast) at Baseline Primary · Baseline

Visual evoked potential (VEP) identifies decreased visual function and helps with discriminations of glaucomatous changes by measuring amplitude (micro volts) and latency (milliseconds (ms)) with 15% contrast parameters.

GroupValue95% CI
rtACS Stimulation Group5.675± 3.208632886
Sham Intervention Group10.6655± 2.1296074
VEP-Measured Latency (15% Contrast) at Baseline Primary · Baseline

Visual evoked potential (VEP) identifies decreased visual function and helps with discriminations of glaucomatous changes by measuring amplitude (micro volts) and latency (milliseconds (ms)) with 15% contrast parameters.

GroupValue95% CI
rtACS Stimulation Group119.166667± 26.759733
Sham Intervention Group130.75± 19.70828929
VEP-Measured Amplitude (85% Contrast) at Baseline Primary · Baseline

Visual evoked potential (VEP) identifies decreased visual function and helps with discriminations of glaucomatous changes by measuring amplitude (micro volts) and latency (milliseconds (ms)) with 85% contrast parameters.

GroupValue95% CI
rtACS Stimulation Group8.3314± 2.794988157
Sham Intervention Group10.0365± 3.7914384
VEP-Measured Latency (85% Contrast) at Baseline Primary · Baseline

Visual evoked potential (VEP) identifies decreased visual function and helps with discriminations of glaucomatous changes by measuring amplitude (micro volts) and latency (milliseconds (ms)) with 85% contrast parameters.

GroupValue95% CI
rtACS Stimulation Group110.5± 11.051018
Sham Intervention Group121± 10.839742

Sponsor's own description

This pilot study will test the preliminary efficacy and feasibility of an intervention protocol for one method of electric current stimulation, repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS), to treat visual impairment in people with glaucoma. We will evaluate a study protocol to use in future clinical trials to test the effectiveness of rtACS to ameliorate the progressive effects of vision loss both structurally and functionally in the eye, the visual pathway, and in regard to people's independence (i.e., functional ability). In this prospective, randomized controlled, double-masked pilot study, we will: 1) determine an effect of rtACS on ophthalmic structure and function (from retina to visual brain), 2) assess the methodology of procedures for assessment of people's functional ability and quality of life (QoL) to determine an effect of rtACS, and 3) assess the feasibility and implementation of the pilot study protocol for a larger multi-site, randomized controlled trial.

Publications & conference data

2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Target-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Deprivation Puts Retinal Ganglion Cells on Death Row: Cold Hard Evidence and Caveats.
    Claes M, De Groef L, Moons L. · · 2019 · cited 18× · PMID 31484425 · DOI 10.3390/ijms20174314
  2. Transorbital Alternating Current Stimulation in a Double-Masked Randomized Clinical Trial: Visual Functional Effect and Quality of Life.
    Ramos Cadena MLA, Sohn A, Livengood H, Lee TF, et al · · 2025 · cited 2× · PMID 39584183 · DOI 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100614

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Glaucoma

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other NYU Langone Health trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03188042.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing