NCT03114956

Surface Decontamination in Treatment of Peri-Implantitis

Withdrawn NA Last updated 21 June 2019

What this trial tests

NA trial testing Gauze in Peri-implantitis. Withdrawn.

Timeline

19 June 2019

Primary endpoint
19 June 2019

19 June 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsor	University of Southern California
Phase	NA
Status	Withdrawn
Study type	INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation	randomized
Design	parallel
Masking	single
Primary purpose	treatment
Start date	19 June 2019
Primary completion	19 June 2019
Estimated completion	19 June 2019

Drugs / interventions tested

• Gauze
• Titanium brush
• Air powder abrasion
• Comprehensive

Conditions studied

• Peri-implantitis — all drugs for Peri-implantitis →

Sponsor

University of Southern California

Who can join

Adults 18 to 75, any sex, with Peri-implantitis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Peri-implantitis represents a major biological complication of implant dentistry with reported prevalence of up to 47% of implants. The disease is characterized by inflammatory response to the biofilm inhabiting the implant surface. To treat this inflammatory disease, surgical and non-surgical therapies have been proposed, all of which entail biofilm removal through implant surface decontamination. Systematic review of various surface decontamination protocols has failed to demonstrate superiority of any of the protocols. One possible explanation is that most studies have examined decontamination of implant surfaces following experimentally-induced peri-implantitis, where implant surfaces lack the tenacious mineralized biofilm often found in clinical peri-implantitis and are therefore easily decontaminated.

The investigators have hypothesized that control of inflammation and repair of pathologically damaged peri-implant tissues requires a comprehensive mechanical plus chemical surface decontamination therapy. The aims of this study are to 1) determine the most effective surface decontamination protocol that can lead to control of peri-implant inflammation and 2) delineate the microbial and immunological mediators that are associated with the changes in peri-implant inflammation. The investigators propose to compare conventional implant surface contamination techniques to a comprehensive mechanical plus chemical protocol. This randomized controlled clinical trial seeks to enroll 68 participants with at least one implant diagnosed with moderate to severe peri-implantitis. Pre-op parameters to be assessed include: probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing, suppuration, plaque index, marginal inflammation, recession, clinical attachment level, inflammatory biomarkers and microbial sampling, and digital intra-oral peri-apical radiograph. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the four surgical debridement intervention groups: (A) gauzes soaked in sterile saline and chlorhexidine; (B) Titanium brush; (C) Air power abrasion; (D) comprehensive surface decontamination, including titanium brush, air powder abrasion and surface etching with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid gel. At 3-months post-operative, the initial clinical assessment will be repeated. The clinical examination will be used to analyze the efficacy of each treatment in controlling peri-implant mucosal inflammation. The ultimate objective of this research is not only to identify an effective method for control of peri-implant inflammation, but also to lay the foundation to detect biomarkers of peri-implantitis that can potentially be helpful in future studies as risk factors of this disease.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.