Adults 18 to 80, any sex, with Fibromyalgia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mean Daily Average Pain Score as Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)Primary· Baseline and week 8
The mean daily average pain score was assessed thorugh the Daily Average Pain NRS, which is a generic instrument for the assessment of pain that consists of a single question that asks participants to record their daily average pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine." The mean daily average pain score was calculated from data recorded by participants daily in the electronic diary, and the recall period was the last 24 hours. A negative change indicated a reduction/improvement from baseline (i.e., a favorable outcome).
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-1.42
± 0.19
ASP8062
-1.36
± 0.19
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Primary· From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 87 days)
Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), which included abnormalities identified during a medical test (e.g. laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiogram, etc.) if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, needed active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study drug or was clinically significant. A TEAE was defined as any AE that started or worsened after the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug. AEs were considered serious (SAEs) if the AE resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disabilit
Any TEAE
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
43
ASP8062
67
Drug-related TEAE
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
19
ASP8062
45
Serious TEAE
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
Drug-related serious TEAE
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
TEAE leading to withdrawal of treatment
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
3
ASP8062
10
Death
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
TEAE in drug abuse, dependence, withdrawal SMQ
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
TEAE in drug abuse and dependence SMQ
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
Number of Participants With an Affirmative Response to Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS): Suicidal IdeationPrimary· Weeks 1 to 8
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a questionnaire used for suicide risk assessment. Affirmative or negative responses were provided to 5 items to suicidal ideation (1. Wish to be dead, 2. Non-specific active suicidal thoughts, 3. Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act, 4. Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan, 5. Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent).
Wish to be dead
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1
ASP8062
1
Non-specific active suicidal thoughts
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
With any methods (not plan) w/o intent to act
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
With some intent to act, w/o specific plan
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
With specific plan and intent
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
Number of Participants With an Affirmative Response to C-SSRS: Suicidal BehaviorPrimary· Weeks 1 to 8
The C-SSRS is a questionnaire used for suicide risk assessment. Affirmative or negative responses were provided to 5 items to suicidal behavior (1. Preparatory acts or behavior, 2. Aborted attempt, 3. Interrupted attempt, 4. Actual attempt, 5. Completed suicide).
Preparatory acts or behavior
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
Aborted attempt
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
Interrupted attempt
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
Actual attempt
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
Completed suicide
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
0
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 8 and End of Treatment (EOT) in Mean Daily Average Pain Score as Assessed by NRSSecondary· Baseline to week 8
The mean daily average pain score was assessed through the Daily Average Pain NRS, which is a generic instrument for the assessment of pain that consists of a single question that asks participants to record their daily average pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine." The mean daily average pain score was calculated from data recorded by participants daily in the electronic diary, and the recall period was the last 24 hours. For the week 8 analysis, participants with missing baseline or week 8 data were classified as nonresponders. For EOT a
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
31.8
23.6 – 40.9
ASP8062
25.3
18.1 – 33.7
EOT
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
33.0
24.7 – 42.1
ASP8062
27.4
19.9 – 35.9
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline to Week 8 and EOT in Mean Daily Average Pain Score as Assessed by NRSSecondary· Baseline to week 8
The mean daily average pain score was assessed thorugh the Daily Average Pain NRS, which is a generic instrument for the assessment of pain that consists of a single question that asks participants to record their daily average pain on an 11-point scale, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 "pain as bad as you can imagine." The mean daily average pain score was calculated from data recorded by participants daily in the electronic diary, and the recall period was the last 24 hours. For the week 8 analysis, participants with missing baseline or week 8 data were classified as nonresponders. For EOT a
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
12.5
7.2 – 19.8
ASP8062
14.7
9.1 – 22.1
EOT
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
12.5
7.2 – 19.8
ASP8062
16.8
10.9 – 24.4
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8 and EOT in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR) Function Subscale ScoreSecondary· Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8
The FIQR was developed to capture total spectrum of problems related to fibromyalgia and the responses to therapy. The 21-item FIQR contains 3 subscales: function (9 questions), overall impact (2 questions), and symptoms (10 questions). Participants answer each question on an 11-point NRS, with anchors appropriate to each question on a tablet device during a visit. The recall period was the last 7 days or the last time the activity was performed if not within the 7-day recall period. The Function subscale has a range of scores of 0 to 90, with a lower score indicating better (higher) function.
Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-8.21
± 1.46
ASP8062
-8.89
± 1.42
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-10.25
± 1.67
ASP8062
-10.89
± 1.65
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-12.88
± 1.91
ASP8062
-12.02
± 1.89
EOT
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-12.05
± 1.87
ASP8062
-10.96
± 1.78
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and EOT in the FIQR Symptoms Subscale ScoreSecondary· Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8
The FIQR was developed to capture the total spectrum of problems related to fibromyalgia and the responses to therapy. The 21-item FIQR contains 3 subscales: function (9 questions), overall impact (2 questions), and symptoms (10 questions). Participants answer each question on an 11-point NRS, with anchors appropriate to each question on a tablet device during a visit. The recall period was the last 7 days. The Symptoms subscale range of scores is 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a better (lower) level of symptoms. A negative change indicates a reduction/improvement from baseline (i.e.,
Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-9.05
± 1.33
ASP8062
-8.89
± 1.29
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-10.91
± 1.49
ASP8062
-9.45
± 1.46
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-12.40
± 1.83
ASP8062
-10.70
± 1.82
EOT
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-11.47
± 1.77
ASP8062
-9.79
± 1.69
Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and EOT in the FIQR Overall Impact Subscale ScoreSecondary· Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8
The FIQR was developed to capture the total spectrum of problems related to fibromyalgia and the responses to therapy. The 21-item FIQR contains 3 subscales: function (9 questions), overall impact (2 questions), and symptoms (10 questions). Participants answer each question on an 11-point NRS, with anchors appropriate to each question on a tablet device during a visit. The recall period was the last 7 days. The Overall Impact subscale has a range of scores from 0 to 20, with a lower score indicating better (lower) impact. A negative change indicated a reduction/improvement from baseline (i.e.,
Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-2.79
± 0.42
ASP8062
-2.60
± 0.41
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-3.04
± 0.52
ASP8062
-3.20
± 0.51
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-3.50
± 0.50
ASP8062
-3.44
± 0.50
EOT
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-3.38
± 0.49
ASP8062
-3.21
± 0.46
Overall Participant Improvement as Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Secondary· Weeks 2, 4, 8
The PGIC is a self-administered 7-point Likert scale that asks participants to evaluate their fibromyalgia relative to baseline. This is a single question and the grade ranges from 1 ("Very Much Improved") to 7 ("Very Much Worse").
Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0
ASP8062
4
Placebo
7
ASP8062
9
Placebo
34
ASP8062
28
Placebo
34
ASP8062
42
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
2
ASP8062
6
Placebo
13
ASP8062
13
Placebo
34
ASP8062
23
Placebo
28
ASP8062
39
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
5
ASP8062
12
Placebo
13
ASP8062
12
Placebo
33
ASP8062
17
Placebo
26
ASP8062
38
EOT
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
5
ASP8062
12
Placebo
13
ASP8062
12
Placebo
34
ASP8062
19
Placebo
24
ASP8062
34
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 87 days).
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The purpose of this study was to assess analgesic efficacy of ASP8062 relative to placebo as well as the safety and tolerability. This study also assessed the treatment differences in physical function as well the improvements in overall subject status (e.g., fibromyalgia symptoms, global functioning) of ASP8062 relative to placebo.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
NCT05096117 — Human Laboratory Study of ASP8062 for Alcohol Use Disorder
· Phase 2
· completed
NCT05062577 — A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of ASP8062 as an Add-on Therapy to Buprenorphine/Naloxone in Participants With
· Phase 2
· withdrawn
NCT04447287 — A Study to Assess the Effect of a Single Dose of ASP8062 on the Multiple Dose Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT04003402 — A Study to Assess Potential Interaction Between ASP8062 and Alcohol in Healthy Adult Subjects
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT03183739 — Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of ASP8062 in Healthy Japanese Male and Female Subjects
· Phase 1
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Fibromyalgia
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT02285868 — ATI Evidence-based Guide Investigating Clinical Services
· active not recruiting
NCT07245303 — Neural Mechanisms of Light Driven Analgesia
· NA
· recruiting
NCT05901259 — The EXOPULSE Study - a Database for Routine Follow-up of Clinical Outcomes
· recruiting
NCT07358754 — The Relationship Between Serum S100B and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor
· recruiting
NCT07465991 — The Effect of Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia on Physical Activity in Fibromyalgia
· NA
· recruiting
Other Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07488676 — A Study of ASP546C in Adults With Gastroesophageal Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer or Other Solid Tumors
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT07475806 — A Study to Find Out if Enfortumab Vedotin Given With Pembrolizumab Helps People With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Keep
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07425574 — A Study to Learn How Stargardt-type Eye Conditions Progress in Children and Adults
· recruiting
NCT07409272 — A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Setidegrasib, Given With Either mFOLFIRINOX or NALIRIFOX Chemotherap
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07287995 — A Study of ASP2998 Given by Itself and Given With Standard Therapies in People With Solid Tumors
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Last refreshed: 3 November 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03092726.