Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03024437

Atezolizumab in Combination With Entinostat and Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Terminated Phase 1, PHASE2 Results posted Last updated 20 March 2025
What this trial tests

Phase 1, PHASE2 trial testing Atezolizumab in Metastatic Cancer in 31 participants. Terminated before completion.

Timeline
29 June 2017
Primary endpoint
24 June 2024
24 June 2024

Quick facts

Lead sponsorRoberto Pili
PhasePhase 1, PHASE2
StatusTerminated
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationnon randomized
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment31
Start date29 June 2017
Primary completion24 June 2024
Estimated completion24 June 2024
Sites4 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Roberto Pili

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Metastatic Cancer or Renal Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Phase I: Recommended Phase II Dose of Entinostat Primary · 21 days

Three dose levels of entinostat (1 mg, 3 mg and 5 mg) were tested according to the 3 + 3 standard design. The starting dose level of entinostat was 1 mg orally every 7 days. DLTs attributable to entinostat and/or bevacizumab and/or atezolizumab were evaluated during the first 21 days of the combination treatment. If a DLT occurs in 1 patient treated at the starting dose level, a minimum of 3 additional patients will be treated at this dose level. If DLTs occur in 2 or more of the first 6 patients, the study will be terminated. If a DLT occurs in 1 out of 6 patients, 3 additional patients will

GroupValue95% CI
Phase I - Dose Escalation5
Phase II: Percentage of Patients With Objective Response Primary · Up to 1 year

Percentage of patients who achieved a complete response or partial response to treatment as measured per RECIST 1.1. Complete response: Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter.

GroupValue95% CI
Phase II - Cohort A62.535.4 – 84.8
Phase II - Cohort B33.30.8 – 90.6
Phase I: Percentage of Patients With Objective Response Secondary · Up to 1 year

Percentage of patients who achieved a complete response or partial response to treatment as measured per RECIST 1.1. Complete response: Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter.

GroupValue95% CI
Phase I - Dose Level 15011.8 – 88.2
Phase I - Dose Level 2200.5 – 71.6
Phase I - Dose Level 383.335.9 – 99.6
Phase II: Median Progression-free Survival Secondary · Up to 4.5 years

Progression free survival was defined as the time from on treatment date to date of recurrence of any type or death from any cause. Patients who did not experience recurrence or death were censored at their last evaluation date. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine the median and 95% confidence interval.

GroupValue95% CI
Phase II - Cohort A13.78.7 – 21.3
Phase II - Cohort B9.81.3 – NA
Phase II: Median Overall Survival Secondary · Up to 5.5 years

Overall survival was defined as the time from on treatment date to death due to any cause. Patients who remained alive were censored at their last known alive date. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine the median and 95% confidence interval.

GroupValue95% CI
Phase II - Cohort A51.621.8 – NA
Phase II - Cohort B31.222.8 – NA

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Up to 2.5 years for adverse events and up to 5.5 years for all-cause mortality.. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Phase I - Dose Level 1
Serious: 3/6 (50%)
Deaths: 6/6
Phase I - Dose Level 2
Serious: 5/6 (83%)
Deaths: 5/6
Phase I - Dose Level 3
Serious: 6/6 (100%)
Deaths: 4/6
Phase II - Cohort A
Serious: 6/12 (50%)
Deaths: 4/12
Phase II - Cohort B
Serious: 0/1 (0%)
Deaths: 1/1

Serious adverse events (35 terms)

ReactionSystemPhase I - Dose Level 1Phase I - Dose Level 2Phase I - Dose Level 3Phase II - Cohort APhase II - Cohort B
PneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders
Atrial flutterCardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardiaCardiac disorders
Endocrine disorders - OtherEndocrine disorders
HyperthyroidismEndocrine disorders
Retinal detachmentEye disorders
ColitisGastrointestinal disorders
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders
Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders
Oral hemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders
Rectal fistulaGastrointestinal disorders
Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders
PainGeneral disorders
Allergic reactionImmune system disorders
Lung infectionInfections and infestations
SepsisInfections and infestations
SinusitisInfections and infestations
Spinal fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations
Blood bilirubin increasedInvestigations
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Generalized muscle weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Other adverse events (126 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemPhase I - Dose Level 1Phase I - Dose Level 2Phase I - Dose Level 3Phase II - Cohort APhase II - Cohort B
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations
HypophosphatemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
ProteinuriaRenal and urinary disorders
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
FatigueGeneral disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
Creatinine increasedInvestigations
Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations
HyponatremiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HypothyroidismEndocrine disorders
Gastroesophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disorders
FeverGeneral disorders
SinusitisInfections and infestations
Upper respiratory infectionInfections and infestations
Alkaline phosphatase increasedInvestigations
Lipase increasedInvestigations
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ArthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
DizzinessNervous system disorders
HeadacheNervous system disorders
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders - OtherSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
HypertensionVascular disorders
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
ColitisGastrointestinal disorders
HemorrhoidsGastrointestinal disorders
ToothacheGastrointestinal disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
ChillsGeneral disorders
Edema limbsGeneral disorders
Localized edemaGeneral disorders
PainGeneral disorders
Skin infectionInfections and infestations
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations

Most-reported serious reactions: Pneumonitis, Atrial fibrillation, Atrial flutter, Sinus bradycardia, Endocrine disorders - Other, Hyperthyroidism, Retinal detachment, Colitis.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03024437 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This study will assess the immunomodulatory activity of entinostat in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab. The overall hypothesis is that entinostat will increase the immune response and anti-tumor effect induced by the PD-L1 inhibition by suppressing Treg function. We have chosen renal cell carcinoma that has been reported to respond to PD1/PD-L 1 inhibition. The schedule of entinostat is based on our previous experience with this agent. Based on our working hypothesis that low dose HDAC inhibitors will have a suppressive function on Tregs but not on T effector cells, the starting dose of entinostat will be 1 mg and will be escalated up to 5 mg rather than the 10 mg dose. The combination also with bevacizumab will provide an effective VEGF inhibition that may potentiate the immune response and anti-tumor effect induced by atezolizumab. The proposed dose and schedule for atezolizumab and bevacizumab has been shown to be well tolerated in prior Phase/I/II studies and is currently tested in a Phase III randomized study in patients with renal cell carcinoma with sunitinib as a control arm. The highest proposed dose level for entinostat (5 mg) represents 50% of the recommended Phase II dose for this compound as a single agent.

Publications & conference data

8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. PD-1 and PD-L1 Checkpoint Signaling Inhibition for Cancer Immunotherapy: Mechanism, Combinations, and Clinical Outcome.
    Alsaab HO, Sau S, Alzhrani R, Tatiparti K, et al · · 2017 · cited 1206× · PMID 28878676 · DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00561
  2. Targeting epigenetic regulators for cancer therapy: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials.
    Cheng Y, He C, Wang M, Ma X, et al · · 2019 · cited 760× · PMID 31871779 · DOI 10.1038/s41392-019-0095-0
  3. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as immunosuppressive regulators and therapeutic targets in cancer.
    Li K, Shi H, Zhang B, Ou X, et al · · 2021 · cited 687× · PMID 34620838 · DOI 10.1038/s41392-021-00670-9
  4. Synergistic effect of immune checkpoint blockade and anti-angiogenesis in cancer treatment.
    Yi M, Jiao D, Qin S, Chu Q, et al · · 2019 · cited 487× · PMID 30925919 · DOI 10.1186/s12943-019-0974-6
  5. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Hinder the Anti-Cancer Activity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
    Weber R, Fleming V, Hu X, Nagibin V, et al · · 2018 · cited 422× · PMID 29942309 · DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01310
  6. Immune checkpoint therapy in liver cancer.
    Xu F, Jin T, Zhu Y, Dai C. · · 2018 · cited 299× · PMID 29843754 · DOI 10.1186/s13046-018-0777-4
  7. Epigenetic regulation in the tumor microenvironment: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.
    Yang J, Xu J, Wang W, Zhang B, et al · · 2023 · cited 251× · PMID 37217462 · DOI 10.1038/s41392-023-01480-x
  8. Epigenetic modulation of antitumor immunity for improved cancer immunotherapy.
    Dai E, Zhu Z, Wahed S, Qu Z, et al · · 2021 · cited 224× · PMID 34930302 · DOI 10.1186/s12943-021-01464-x

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Atezolizumab

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Metastatic Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Roberto Pili trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03024437.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing