Long-term, Open-label, Flexible-dose, Extension Study of Vortioxetine in Child and Adolescent Participants With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) From 7 to 18 Years of Age
TerminatedPhase 3Results postedLast updated 28 December 2022
What this trial tests
Phase 3 trial testing Vortioxetine in Depressive Disorder, Major in 662 participants. Terminated before completion.
Adults 7 to 18, any sex, with Depressive Disorder, Major. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Primary· Baseline up to Week 30
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. SAEs included death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized the participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. TEAE was define
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
404
Change From Baseline in Children Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Week 26Secondary· Baseline, Week 26
CDRS-R consisted of 17 items out of which 3 items rated nonverbal observations (listless speech, hypoactivity, and depressed affect). Fourteen items were rated on a 7-point scale from 1 to 7, and 3 items (sleep disturbance, appetite disturbance, and listless speech) were scored on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. A rating of 1 indicated normal functioning and a higher number indicated a greater degree of depression. Total score ranged from 17 (normal) to 113 (severe depression). Least square (LS) mean was calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measurements
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
-16.05
± 0.63
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score at Week 26Secondary· Baseline, Week 26
The CGI-S provides the clinician's impression of the participant's current state of mental illness. The clinician uses his or her clinical experience of this participant population to rate the severity of the participant's current mental illness on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal - not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). LS mean was calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood-based MMRM approach.
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
-1.48
± 0.06
Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreSecondary· Week 26
The CGI-I provides the clinician's impression of the participant's improvement (or worsening). The clinician assesses the participant's condition relative to a baseline on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). LS mean was calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood-based MMRM approach.
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
1.72
± 0.04
Children (7-11 Years): Change From Baseline in Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Preschool (BRIEF-P) Using the Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score at Week 26Secondary· Baseline, Week 26
BRIEF form is an 86-item measure with symptoms rated on a 3-point likert scale of 1 "never", 2 "sometimes" or 3 "often". These items cover 8 non-overlapping clinical scales. For BRIEF-P form, only the first 72 items (Inhibit \[10\], Shift \[8\], Emotional Control \[10\], Initiate \[8\], Working Memory \[10\], Plan/Organize \[12\], Organization of Materials \[6\], Monitor \[8\]) were included in clinical scales. Clinical scales combined to form 2 indexes, Behavioural Regulation Index (BRI) and Metacognition Index (MI), and 1 composite summary score, the GEC, that incorporates all 8 clinical sca
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
-7.41
± 11.70
Adolescents (12-18 Years): Change From Baseline in Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Self-report (BRIEF-SR) Using the GEC Score at Week 26Secondary· Baseline, Week 26
BRIEF form is an 86-item measure that assesses impairment in executive function with symptoms rated on a 3-point likert scale of 1 "never", 2 "sometimes" or 3 "often". These items cover 8 non-overlapping clinical scales. For BRIEF-SR form, only 80 items (Inhibit \[13\], Shift \[10\], Emotional Control \[10\], Initiate \[5\], Working Memory \[12\], Plan/Organize \[13\], Organization of Materials \[7\], Monitor \[10\]) were included in clinical scales. Clinical scales combined to form 2 indexes, the BRI and the MI, and 1 composite summary score, the GEC, that incorporates all 8 clinical scales.
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
-7.50
± 13.82
Children (7-11 Years): Change From Baseline in BRIEF-P Using the MI Score at Week 26Secondary· Baseline, Week 26
BRIEF form is an 86-item measure that assesses impairment in executive function with symptoms rated on a 3-point likert scale of 1 "never", 2 "sometimes" or 3 "often". These items cover 8 non-overlapping clinical scales. Clinical scales combined to form 2 indexes, the BRI and the MI. For BRIEF-P, MI is comprised of Initiate (8), Working Memory (10), Plan/Organize (12), Organization of Materials (6), and Monitor (8) scales. The MI scores are calculated as the sum of the total 44 items ranging from 44 to 132 with lower scores reflecting better functioning. Raw scores converted to T-scores as det
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
-7.36
± 11.98
Adolescents (12-18 Years): Change From Baseline in BRIEF-SR Using the MI Score at Week 26Secondary· Baseline, Week 26
BRIEF form is an 86-item measure that assesses impairment in executive function with symptoms rated on a 3-point likert scale of 1 "never", 2 "sometimes" or 3 "often". These items cover 8 non-overlapping clinical scales. Clinical scales combined to form 2 indexes, the BRI and the MI. For BRIEF-SR, MI is comprised of Working Memory (12), Plan/Organize (13), Organization of Materials (7), and Task Completion (10) scales. The MI scores are calculated as the sum of the total 42 items ranging from 42 to 126 with lower scores reflecting better functioning. Raw scores converted to T-scores as detaile
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
-7.18
± 13.71
Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Score at Week 26Secondary· Baseline, Week 26
The CGAS is a clinician-rated global scale to measure the lowest level of functioning for a child (4 to 16 years) during a specified time period. The CGAS contains behaviourally-oriented descriptors at each anchor point that depict behaviours and life situations applicable to a child. The score ranges from 1 (most functionally impaired child) to 100 (the healthiest). A score greater than 70 indicates normal function.
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
14.78
± 14.29
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Present Functioning Visual Analogue Scale (PedsQL VAS) Total Score at Week 26Secondary· Baseline, Week 26
The PedsQL™ VAS is designed to measure at-that-moment functioning in children and adolescents. The PedsQL™ VAS consists of 6 domains: anxiety, sadness, anger, worry, fatigue, and pain using VAS. The functionality for each domain is measured on a 10 cm line with a happy face at one end and a sad face at the other (0-10 points). The participants are asked to mark on the line how they feel. The total score is the average of all 6 items ranging from 0 to 10, where a lower value represents a better outcome.
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
-1.50
± 1.87
Number of Participants With Response to the Palatability QuestionnaireSecondary· assessed at Baseline up to Week 26, Week 26 reported
The palatability of vortioxetine oral drops was assessed after intake of a single dose (5 to 20 mg) corresponding to the participant's current vortioxetine dose (replacing the vortioxetine tablet on that day). The palatability assessment included 4 questions on the overall appreciation of a medicinal product in relation to its taste (What do you think of the taste), mouthfeel (How does medicine feel in your mouth), aftertaste (What do you think of the after taste), and smell (What do you think of the smell). The items were rated on a 5-point hedonic scale; really bad, bad, neither good or bad,
Mouthfeel
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
11
Vortioxetine
17
Vortioxetine
38
Vortioxetine
55
Aftertaste
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
13
Vortioxetine
26
Vortioxetine
54
Vortioxetine
32
Smell
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
4
Vortioxetine
4
Vortioxetine
37
Vortioxetine
59
Taste
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
13
Vortioxetine
15
Vortioxetine
33
Vortioxetine
60
Number of Participants With Response to the Acceptability QuestionnaireSecondary· assessed at Baseline up to Week 26, Week 26 reported
The acceptability of vortioxetine oral drops was assessed after intake of a single dose (5 to 20 mg) corresponding to the participant's current vortioxetine dose (replacing the vortioxetine tablet on that day). The acceptability assessment was based on 3 items; acceptability of the taste, whether the drops were perceived as easy to take, willingness to take the drops every day (provided it was the only available formulation). For each item the response options were no, not sure, and yes. The oral drops were considered acceptable if \<60% of participants responded "no" to each of the 3 question
Willingness to take the drops every day: No
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
27
Willingness to take the drops every day: Not sure
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
17
Willingness to take the drops every day: Yes
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
109
Easy to take medicine: No
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
8
Easy to take medicine: Neither easy or difficult
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
10
Easy to take medicine: Yes
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
135
Acceptability of the taste: No
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
31
Acceptability of the taste: Not sure
Group
Value
95% CI
Vortioxetine
24
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 30.
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Evaluation of the long-term safety and tolerability of vortioxetine in child and adolescent participants with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5™) diagnosis of MDD.
Publications & conference data
2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Other recruiting trials for Depressive Disorder, Major
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07227454 — A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine for Reduction of Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07258485 — A Study to Evaluate Sleep Electroencephalogram (EEG) Features (Brain Activity While Sleeping) in Participants With Major
· recruiting
NCT07059234 — The Motor Activity - Subjective Energy (MASE) Project
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06982820 — Self Neuro-modulation Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) With Anhedonia
· NA
· recruiting
NCT05553353 — Dosing rTMS for Depression Post-SCI
· NA
· recruiting
Other H. Lundbeck A/S trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07514858 — A Trial Investigating Lu AF28996 in Adults With Parkinson's Disease Who Have Motor Fluctuations
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07513441 — A Trial of Lu AF28996 in Participants With Parkinson's Disease (PD)
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT06701526 — A Trial of Eptinezumab in Participants With Migraine and Insufficient Response to Anti-CGRP Medications
· Phase 4
· active not recruiting
NCT06706622 — A Trial of Amlenetug (Lu AF82422) in Participants With Multiple System Atrophy (MSA)
· Phase 3
· active not recruiting
NCT06557850 — A Trial Investigating Lu AG22515 in Adult Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Thyroid Eye Disease
· Phase 1
· active not recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 9 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by H. Lundbeck A/S
Last refreshed: 28 December 2022
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02871297.