Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02870140: TALENT

Thin Strut Sirolimus-eluting Stent in All Comers Population vs Everolimus-eluting Stent

Completed NA Last updated 17 December 2020
What this trial tests

NA trial testing SUPRAFLEX in Coronary Stenosis in 1,435 participants. Completed in 26 August 2020.

Timeline
21 October 2016
Primary endpoint
20 September 2018
26 August 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorECRI bv
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment1,435
Start date21 October 2016
Primary completion20 September 2018
Estimated completion26 August 2020
Sites23 locations across Italy, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Spain

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

ECRI bv — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Coronary Stenosis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The primary objective of this study is to compare the performance of SUPRAFLEX to that of XIENCE in an all-comers patient population with symptomatic ischemic heart disease. The patients will be followed through 3 years for major clinical events.

Publications & conference data

4 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Safety and efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting coronary stent with ultra-thin strut for treatment of atherosclerotic lesions (TALENT): a prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Zaman A, de Winter RJ, Kogame N, Chang CC, et al · · 2019 · cited 74× · PMID 30827782 · DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32467-x
  2. Sirolimus-eluting stents with ultrathin struts versus everolimus-eluting stents for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: final three-year results of the TALENT trial.
    de Winter RJ, Zaman A, Hara H, Gao C, et al · · 2022 · cited 19× · PMID 35285804 · DOI 10.4244/eij-d-21-00766
  3. A Narrative Review of Ultrathin-strut Drug-eluting Stents: The Thinner the Better?
    Grundeken MJ, Beijk MA. · · 2021 · cited 9× · PMID 36277831 · DOI 10.17925/hi.2021.15.2.84
  4. Comparison of Clinically Adjudicated Versus Flow-Based Adjudication of Revascularization Events in Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Wang R, Kawashima H, Hara H, Gao C, et al · · 2021 · cited 7× · PMID 34666500 · DOI 10.1161/circoutcomes.121.008055

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Coronary Stenosis

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other ECRI bv trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02870140.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing