Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02830074

Treatment of Sleep-disordered Breathing in Patients With SCI

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 19 May 2021
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Best practices PAP + patient Education +ongoing Support and Training in Spinal Cord Injury in 73 participants. Completed in 30 March 2020.

Timeline
1 May 2017
Primary endpoint
30 September 2019
30 March 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorVA Office of Research and Development
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment73
Start date1 May 2017
Primary completion30 September 2019
Estimated completion30 March 2020
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Spinal Cord Injury or Sleep-disordered Breathing. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

PAP Adherence Primary · 90 days

Number of nights positive airway pressure (PAP) was used \>=4 hours during the first 90 days measured by remote monitoring. Scores range from 0 to 90 days. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program22.03± 24.74
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing Treatment18.54± 24.67
Subjective Sleep Quality Was Measured by The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Primary · 90 days

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is an 18-item questionnaire that assesses sleep quality and disturbances over the past month. The PSQI is sensitive for distinguishing normal and abnormal sleepers and has good test-retest reliability. The investigators will use the 3-factor scoring, which has been shown to have superior psychometric properties. This will be used as the main independent measure of sleep quality. The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality

GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program6.96± 4.12
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing Treatment9.1± 4.97
Quality of Life Was Measured by WHO-QOL BREF Questionnaire Secondary · 90 days

The questionnaire is composed of four domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships and environment. It also includes one question on overall quality of life and one on general health. Importantly, items on this scale are not dependent on mobility, which is unlikely to change in patients with Spinal Cord Injury/Disease as a result of improved sleep. The WHOQOL-BREF scores correlate highly (.89 or above) with WHOQOL-100 scores, and demonstrate good discriminant validity, content validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The four WHOQOL-BREF domain scores

WHO-QOL phys
GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program60.13± 21.37
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment54.72± 22.08
WHO-QOL psych
GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program69.22± 14.69
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment62.90± 19.64
WHO-QOL Soc
GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program63.70± 24.39
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment57.52± 23.20
WHO-QOL ENV
GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program74.09± 12.66
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment69.75± 18.40
Respiratory Function: Spirometry and Respiratory Muscle Force Secondary · 90 days

Spirometry is a simple bedside test used to evaluate lung function. Key spirometry values include forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume over 1 second (FEV1) and the absolute FEV1/FVC ratio. If the FVC and FEV1 are decreased, the absolute FEV1/FVC ratio distinguishes between obstructive and restrictive impairments. A normal absolute FEV1/FVC ratio suggest that restrictive ventilatory impairment may be present, and a reduced FEV1 and absolute FEV1/FVC ratio indicates an obstructive ventilator pattern. The investigators will use supine FVC and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP)

GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program3.38± 1.04
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment3.20± 0.97
Functional Status Was Measured by CHART Questionnaire. Secondary · 90 days

The CHART is a measure of overall function. The scale is divided into five separate domain scores: Physical, Cognitive, Mobility, Occupation, and Social integration. Each of the five domains scored from 0-100. higher number indicates better outcome.

Physical
GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program79.09± 31.02
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment82.70± 31.39
Cognitive
GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program70.70± 23.90
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment78.83± 22.44
Mobility
GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program82.20± 19.64
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment78.17± 24.33
Occupation
GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program48.98± 31.39
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment38.90± 33.76
Social integration
GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program79± 23.64
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment66.80± 29.42
Depressive Symptom Severity Secondary · 90 days

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a 9-item depression module in the PHQ (a self-administered diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders) which is part of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) suite of evaluation tools. The PHQ-9 aligns to the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for depression and is widely used to screen for depression across VA. The PHQ-9 total score will be used to measure depressive symptom severity as an outcome. As a severity measure, the PHQ-9 score can range from 0 to 27. Higher the value, worse the outcome.

GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program5.03± 5.89
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment8.38± 6.44
Fatigue Symptoms Secondary · 90 days

The Flinders Fatigue Scale (FFS) is a 7-item fatigue rating scale used to measure general symptoms of fatigue. The FFS total score will be used as an outcome measure. Total fatigue scores range from 0 to 31, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.

GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program9.61± 8.46
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment12.12± 9.33
Epworth Sleepiness Scale Secondary · 90 days

The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a self-administered questionnaire that quantifies daytime sleepiness, with higher scores indicating increased daytime hypersomnolence The ESS is ranging from 0 to 24. higher scores indicate more sleepiness

GroupValue95% CI
The BEST Program4.58± 4.94
Sleep Education and Standard Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) Treatment6.48± 4.13

Sponsor's own description

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) remains under-treated in individuals living with spinal cord injuries and disorders (SCI/D). The investigators' aim is to test a program that addresses challenges and barriers to positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment of SDB among patients with SCI/D. The investigators anticipate that patients who receive this program will have higher rates of PAP use and will demonstrate improvements in sleep quality, general functioning, respiratory functioning and quality of life from baseline to 6 months follow up compared to individuals who receive a control program. This work addresses critical healthcare needs for patients with SCI/D and may lead to improved health and quality of life for these patients.

Publications & conference data

5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Recent Advances in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury.
    Yari D, Saberi A, Salmasi Z, Ghoreishi SA, et al · · 2024 · cited 9× · PMID 38919744 · DOI 10.22038/abjs.2023.73944.3424
  2. Insomnia severity predicts depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder in veterans with spinal cord injury or disease: a cross-sectional observational study.
    Kelly MR, Zeineddine S, Mitchell MN, Sankari A, et al · · 2023 · cited 8× · PMID 36661092 · DOI 10.5664/jcsm.10410
  3. Intensive support does not improve positive-airway pressure use in spinal cord injury/disease: a randomized clinical trial.
    Badr MS, Martin JL, Sankari A, Zeineddine S, et al · · 2024 · cited 5× · PMID 38422375 · DOI 10.1093/sleep/zsae044
  4. Sleep disorders, daytime symptoms, and quality of life in veterans with multiple sclerosis: preliminary findings.
    Aljundi NA, Kelly M, Zeineddine S, Salloum A, et al · · 2022 · cited 5× · PMID 37193412 · DOI 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac012
  5. Sleep and daytime function in people with spinal cord injury.
    Badr AN, Zeineddine S, Salloum A, Pandya N, et al · · 2025 · cited 1× · PMID 40590079 · DOI 10.5664/jcsm.11804

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Spinal Cord Injury

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other VA Office of Research and Development trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02830074.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing