18 and older, any sex, with Anesthesia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
1st Attempt Success With Supraglottic Airway Devices (SGAD)Primary· from Anesthesia Start to Anesthesia Stop, approximately 1 hour
Success defined as correct placement of SGAD. 1st Attempt success of SGAD either Ambu AuraGain or Teleflex LMA Protector during insertion and placement into an airway.
Successful
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
25
Teleflex LMA Protector
21
Unsuccessful
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
1
Teleflex LMA Protector
3
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP)Secondary· from Anesthesia Start to Anesthesia Stop, approximately 1 hour
OLP measured by a portable, handheld manometer.
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
35
22.00 – 68.00
Teleflex LMA Protector
37
15.00 – 56.20
Number of Participants With a Rate of Successful Intubation and VentilationSecondary· from Anesthesia Start to Anesthesia Stop, approximately 1 hour
Rate of successful intubation and ventilation by utilizing the SGAD as an intubation conduit guided by the Ambu® aScope™ 3 Slim.
Successful
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
21
Teleflex LMA Protector
19
Unsuccessful
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
5
Teleflex LMA Protector
4
Number of Participants With Ease of SGAD InsertionSecondary· from Anesthesia Start to Anesthesia Stop, approximately 1 hour
Qualitative Assessment scale range of 1-4. (1) Easy; (2) Resistance, (3) Difficult; and (4) Unsuccessful.
Easy
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
25
Teleflex LMA Protector
21
Resistance
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
1
Teleflex LMA Protector
2
Difficult
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
0
Teleflex LMA Protector
0
Unsuccessful
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
0
Teleflex LMA Protector
1
Glottic Opening (POGO)Secondary· from Anesthesia Start to Anesthesia Stop, approximately 1 hour
POGO Score of 100% on First Attempt at Device Placement. All participant assessments and observations (clinical data) completed and recorded during the 1st visit
POGO- Observed
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
26
Teleflex LMA Protector
20
POGO- Not Observed
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
0
Teleflex LMA Protector
4
Functionality of Gastric Tube PlacementSecondary· from Anesthesia Start to Anesthesia Stop, approximately 1 hour
Functionality of gastric drainage channel which will be inserted through the appropriate channel of the SGAD.
Easy
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
26
Teleflex LMA Protector
16
Resistance
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
0
Teleflex LMA Protector
1
Difficult
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
0
Teleflex LMA Protector
0
Unsuccessful
Group
Value
95% CI
Ambu AuraGain
0
Teleflex LMA Protector
6
Sponsor's own description
Participant is being asked to take part in this study because participant is going to have surgery that requires general anesthesia (in which participant is unconscious for the procedure).
During surgery, anesthesiologists often place a supraglottic airway device (SGAD). An SGAD is a device that helps participant breathe and may help the anesthesiologist put a breathing tube in participant's airway while participant is asleep during surgery. There are many different kinds of SGADs that are readily available for use by anesthesiologists during surgery. The SGADs that are being studied are the Ambu Auragain and the Teleflex LMA Protector.
The goal of this clinical research study is to compare the effectiveness of both devices.
This is an investigational study. Both of the SGADs that are being used on this study are FDA approved and are frequently used for the surgery that participant is going to have. It is investigational to compare the 2 devices.
Up to 50 participants will be enrolled in this study. All will take part at MD Anderson.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
NCT07053020 — A Phase 1b/2 Open-label, Dose-ranging Safety and Efficacy Study of Oral Cladribine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukem
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07052994 — A Phase Ia/Ib Trial of Revumenib Combined With Cytarabine, Daunorubicin, and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) in Frontline and
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT07137481 — Phase II Study of CD5 CAR Engineered IL15-transduced Cord Blood-derived NK Cells in Conjunction With Lymphodepleting Che
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07162480 — Phase II Trial of Puxitatug Samrotecan (AZD8205) in Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic (R/M) Aggressive Adenoid Cystic Ca
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07076498 — Engineered HSV-1 M032 for the Treatment of Children and Adults With Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Midline Glioma After Standar
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Last refreshed: 27 September 2021
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02724956.