Adults 18 to 130, any sex, with Anemia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Mean Change From Baseline in Hb Averaged Over Week 28 to Week 52Primary· Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) and Week 28 to Week 52.
Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of the last 3 central laboratory Hb values from the screening and randomization visits. Mean change in Hb from baseline to mean value from Week 28 to Week 52 was analyzed using a missing at random (MAR) based multiple imputation analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with baseline Hb, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), cardiovascular (CV) history, geographic region and treatment group as fixed effect covariates. The adjusted least squares (LS) mean estimates of change from baseline to mean during Week 28 to Week 52 are presented.
Group
Value
95% CI
Roxadustat
1.75
± 0.033
Placebo
0.40
± 0.034
Percentage of Participants With Hb Response During the First 24 Weeks of TreatmentSecondary· Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) up to Week 24.
Hb response was defined as:
* Hb ≥ 11.0 g/dL and Hb increase from baseline by ≥ 1.0 g/dL for participants with baseline Hb \> 8.0 g/dL; or
* Hb increase from baseline by ≥ 2.0 g/dL, for participants with baseline Hb ≤ 8.0 g/dL at 2 consecutive visits (with available data) separated at least 5 days during the first 24 weeks of treatment without having received rescue therapy (red blood cell \[RBC\] transfusion, erythropoietin analogue, or intravenous \[IV\] iron) prior to Hb response. The percentage of participants with an Hb response during the first 24 weeks of treatment is presented.
Group
Value
95% CI
Roxadustat
77.0
Placebo
8.5
Mean Change From Baseline in Hb Averaged Over Week 28 to Week 52 in Participants With Baseline High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Greater Than the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)Secondary· Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) and Week 28 to Week 52.
Baseline hsCRP was quantified from stored biomarker samples obtained at randomization. Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of the last 3 central laboratory Hb values from the screening and randomization visits. Mean change in Hb from baseline to mean value during Week 28 to Week 52 was analyzed using a MAR based multiple imputation ANCOVA model with baseline Hb, baseline eGFR, CV history, geographic region and treatment group as fixed effect covariates. The adjusted LS mean estimates of change from baseline in participants with baseline hsCRP \>ULN to mean during Week 28 to Week 52 are present
Group
Value
95% CI
Roxadustat
1.75
± 0.087
Placebo
0.62
± 0.091
Proportion of Total Time of Interpolated Hb Values Greater Than or Equal To 10 g/dL From Week 28 to Week 52Secondary· Week 28 up to Week 52.
Proportion of total time of interpolated Hb values ≥10 g/dL was calculated as the time the linearly interpolated curve between measurements ≥10 g/dL divided by the time between measurements from Week 28 to Week 52. Proportion of total time was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with baseline Hb and baseline eGFR as covariates, and CV history, geographic region and treatment group as fixed effects. The adjusted LS mean estimates of change from Week 28 to Week 52 are presented.
Group
Value
95% CI
Roxadustat
0.82
± 0.011
Placebo
0.33
± 0.011
Proportion of Total Time of Interpolated Hb Values Within the Interval of 10 to 12 g/dL From Week 28 to Week 52Secondary· Week 28 up to Week 52.
Proportion of total time of interpolated Hb values within the interval of 10 to 12 g/dL was calculated as the time the linearly interpolated curve between measurements were within 10 to 12 g/dL divided by the time between measurements from Week 28 to Week 52. Proportion of total time was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with baseline Hb and baseline eGFR as covariates, and CV history, geographic region and treatment group as fixed effects. The adjusted LS mean estimates of change from Week 28 to Week 52 are presented.
Group
Value
95% CI
Roxadustat
0.70
± 0.010
Placebo
0.28
± 0.010
Mean Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 24Secondary· Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) and Week 24
Baseline LDL was defined as the last result obtained prior to randomization. Mean changes in LDL cholesterol from baseline to Week 24 was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with baseline LDL, baseline Hb and baseline eGFR as covariates, and CV history, geographic region and treatment group as fixed effects. The adjusted LS mean estimates of change from baseline to Week 24 are presented.
Group
Value
95% CI
Roxadustat
-0.38
± 0.028
Placebo
-0.02
± 0.027
Time-To-First Instance of Receiving IV Iron, RBC Transfusion or Erythropoietin Analogue as Rescue TherapySecondary· Baseline (Day1, Week 0) up to End of Study (EOS) visit (4 weeks after the treatment period) (or up to date of first rescue therapy), with treatment duration up to 4 years.
Time-to-first rescue therapy (IV iron, RBC transfusion or erythropoietin analogue) was calculated as (date of first rescue therapy, or date of censoring if no rescue therapy was taken) minus (date of first dose of IP) +1. Event rate was calculated as (number of participants with event) divided by (the total number of days at risk for event across all participants in given group divided by 365.25) multiplied by 100. The event rate is presented for participants with events.
Group
Value
95% CI
Roxadustat
11.90
Placebo
39.76
Time-To-First Instance of Receiving a RBC Transfusion As Rescue TherapySecondary· Baseline (Day1, Week 0) up to EOS visit (4 weeks after the treatment period) (or up to date of first RBC rescue therapy), with treatment duration up to 4 years.
Time-to-first RBC rescue therapy was calculated as (date of first RBC rescue therapy, or date of censoring if no rescue therapy was taken) minus (date of first dose of IP) +1. Event rate was calculated as (number of participants with event) divided by (the total number of days at risk for event across all participants in given group divided by 365.25) multiplied by 100. The event rate is presented for participants with events.
Group
Value
95% CI
Roxadustat
7.98
Placebo
19.61
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Vitality Sub-Score From Week 12 to Week 28Secondary· Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) and Week 12 to Week 28.
SF-36 is a Quality of Life (QoL) scale comprising 8 domains of health status: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional and Mental Health. Each domain score is on a scale from 0-100 (worst health possible to best health possible); higher scores indicate better health status. Mean change in SF-36 Vitality sub-score from baseline to mean from Week 12 to Week 28 was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with terms for baseline score, treatment group, baseline Hb, baseline eGFR, CV history, geographic region,
Group
Value
95% CI
Roxadustat
1.59
± 0.231
Placebo
1.15
± 0.233
Annual Rate of eGFR Change From Baseline Prior to the Initiation of Dialysis or Kidney TransplantSecondary· Baseline (Day1, Week 0) up to EOS visit (4 weeks after the treatment period), with treatment duration up to 4 years.
Baseline eGFR was defined as the mean of all available central laboratory values prior to or at randomization. Rate of change in eGFR from baseline during the entire treatment period (in millilitres/minute/1.73 meters squared/years \[mL/min/1.73m\^2/years\]) was estimated using a random effects model using all post-baseline eGFR values prior to initiation of dialysis/transplant. Baseline eGFR, baseline Hb, geographic region, CV history, treatment group and post-baseline eGFR measurement time were used as fixed effects and participant and time (years) as random effects, ie, random intercept and
Group
Value
95% CI
Roxadustat
-3.70
Placebo
-3.19
Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Functioning Sub-Score From Week 12 to Week 28Secondary· Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) and Week 12 to Week 28.
SF-36 is a QoL scale comprising 8 domains of health status: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional and Mental Health. Each domain score is on a scale from 0-100 (worst health possible to best health possible); higher scores indicate better health status. Mean change in SF-36 Physical Functioning sub-score from baseline to mean from Week 12 to Week 28 was analyzed using a MMRM with terms for baseline score, treatment group, baseline Hb, baseline eGFR, CV history, geographic region, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction a
Group
Value
95% CI
Roxadustat
0.14
± 0.222
Placebo
-0.39
± 0.224
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From date of randomization up to EOS visit (4 weeks after the treatment period), with treatment duration up to 4 years..
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of roxadustat for treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis
Publications & conference data
8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07268807 — Effect of Roxadustat on Heart Failure Patients With Anaemia and Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Kidney Disease
· not yet recruiting
NCT07162090 — Hypoxia-inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors on Sarcopenia in Hemodialysis Patients
· Phase 4
· not yet recruiting
NCT05810311 — The Effect of Roxadustat on Renal Oxygenation in Diabetes Nephropathy
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT06903559 — Roxadustat's Effect on Heart, Nutrition, and Inflammation in Hemodialysis Patients
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT06917950 — Roxadustat for Bone and Neuropsychiatric Aspects in Hemodialysis Patients
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Anemia
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07422480 — A Study to Compare Elritercept With Epoetin Alfa to Treat Anemia in Adults With Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myel
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT06968936 — Long-term Outcomes Sub-Study of Preoperative Combined Iron Therapy
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07328191 — Quality of Life-Guided Transfusion in Refractory MDS or AML
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07315295 — Maximizing the Benefits of Iron in Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods for Malnourished Children in Kenya
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07400796 — Assessing Health System Readiness for Scaling Antenatal MMS in Cambodia
· recruiting
Other AstraZeneca trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06998095 — Tezepelumab (Tezspire) Regulatory Postmarketing Surveillance in Korea
· not yet recruiting
NCT07431775 — Saphnelo Use in Females of Child-bearing Potential
· not yet recruiting
NCT07516184 — Explore the Diagnostic Value of Bronchodilation Test With Portable Oscillometry in Asthma Diagnosis
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07279935 — Osimertinib Combined With Chemotherapy in Patients Who Had Distant Recurrence After Adjuvant Osimertinib for EGFRm Resec
· Phase 4
· not yet recruiting
NCT07279948 — A Single-arm Observational Study to Characterize the Demographic, Clinical Features and Outcomes of a Brazilian Cohort o
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by AstraZeneca
Last refreshed: 16 December 2019
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02174627.