Number of sessions attended calculated from attendance sign-in sheets. This is used for the assessment of program feasibility.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 9 | 4 – 9 |
Last reviewed · How we verify
Sugar Champ: Pilot Social Network Intervention to Reduce Intake of Sugary Drinks
NA trial testing Social network intervention in Overweight and Obesity in 34 participants. Completed in 20 November 2017.
| Lead sponsor | Johns Hopkins University |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | na |
| Design | single group |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 34 |
| Start date | 15 January 2017 |
| Primary completion | 20 November 2017 |
| Estimated completion | 20 November 2017 |
| Sites | 1 location across United States |
Johns Hopkins University
Adults 18 to 80, any sex, with Overweight and Obesity. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of sessions attended calculated from attendance sign-in sheets. This is used for the assessment of program feasibility.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 9 | 4 – 9 |
Survey question assesses participant satisfaction with the intervention using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = Very satisfied; 2= Somewhat satisfied; 3 = Somewhat dissatisfied; 4 = Very dissatisfied). This is used for the assessment of program acceptability.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 30 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 4 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 0 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 0 |
Survey question assesses willingness to recommend that a friend participate using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = Very likely; 2= Somewhat likely; 3 = Somewhat unlikely; 4 = Very unlikely). This is used to assess the program acceptability.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 31 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 3 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 0 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 0 |
Participants answered questions from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 5-factor dietary screener, and relevant elements as recommended by NHIS were combined to estimate the daily added sugar intake (i.e.,soda, sugar-sweetened beverages, sweets and doughnuts). At 6 months, this measure ranged (min-max) from 9.1 to 56.0 teaspoons/day in this sample. The American Heart Association recommends that all adults limit their added sugar intake to no more than 9 teaspoons per day.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 17.2 | 11.2 – 27.8 |
Participants answered questions from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 5-factor dietary screener, and relevant elements as recommended by NHIS were combined to estimate the daily added sugar intake (i.e.,soda, sugar-sweetened beverages, sweets and doughnuts). The American Heart Association recommends that all adults limit their added sugar intake to no more than 9 teaspoons per day.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 16.9 | 12.7 – 27.8 |
Participants answered questions from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 5-factor dietary screener, and relevant elements as recommended by NHIS were combined to estimate the daily added sugar intake (i.e.,soda, sugar-sweetened beverages, sweets and doughnuts). The American Heart Association recommends that all adults limit their added sugar intake to no more than 9 teaspoons per day.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 17.4 | 11.2 – 24.5 |
Weight (kg) measured using standard methods
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Social Network Intervention | 84.3 | 74.7 – 100.4 |
The 1.2 million households living in public housing are disproportionately affected by obesity, where prevalence is estimated at 50%. An ecologic framework hypothesizes that this disparity is related, in part, to social and environmental factors within these neighborhoods that influence residents' lifestyles. Social networks and the built environment may work together to promote or inhibit lifestyle behaviors; however, combined social network-built environment interventions have not previously targeted changes in diet. Investigators hypothesize that an intervention that combines a social network approach with strategies that address public housing residents' challenges related to the built environment will improve dietary habits. The investigators' overall aim is to develop a combined social network-built environment intervention to reduce intake of beverages high in added sugars and to pilot test the intervention among residents of public housing developments in Baltimore, MD. The investigators' aim for this work is: 1) To develop a combined social network-built environment intervention to reduce intake of beverages high in added sugars and to pilot test the intervention among residents of public housing developments in Baltimore, MD. Investigators hypothesize that a social network intervention will be feasible and acceptable in promoting healthy lifestyle change, and that this intervention will alter lifestyle behaviors among public housing residents.
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Verify or expand the search:
Trials testing the same drug.
Currently open trials in the same condition.
Trials by the same sponsor.
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02138240.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing