Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02105246

The Healthy Heart Study

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 1 April 2019
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Referral to home-based cardiac rehab in Cardiac Rehabilitation in 1,154 participants. Completed in 31 March 2018.

Timeline
15 July 2015
Primary endpoint
31 March 2018
31 March 2018

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of California, San Francisco
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationnon randomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposeprevention
Enrollment1,154
Start date15 July 2015
Primary completion31 March 2018
Estimated completion31 March 2018
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of California, San Francisco

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Cardiac Rehabilitation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Primary · 12 Months

Number of eligible patients who participated in at least one cardiac rehabilitation exercise session.

GroupValue95% CI
Referral to Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation231
Referral to Center-based Cardiac Rehabilitation252
Change in Distance Completed on 6-minute Walk Test Secondary · 3 months

Baseline to 3-month change in 6-minute walk test distance (feet) among subjects who participated in home-based vs. center-based cardiac rehab.

GroupValue95% CI
Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Participants324160 – 544
Center-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Participants12820 – 226
Change in Distance Completed on 6-minute Walk Test Secondary · 6 months

Baseline to 6-month change in 6-minute walk test distance (feet) among patients who participated in home-based vs. center-based cardiac rehab.

GroupValue95% CI
Referral to Home-based Cardiac Rehab31560 – 544
Referral to Center-based Cardiac Rehab15656 – 305

Sponsor's own description

The long-term goal of this research is to improve patient-centered outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), the leading cause of death in the world. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs decrease mortality and improve quality of life in patients with CHD. Published guidelines recommend exercise-based CR following hospitalization for myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, or percutaneous coronary revascularization. Despite these compelling benefits, CR programs are vastly underutilized, with less than a third of eligible patients participating. One promising solution is greater implementation of home-based CR. Both home and center-based CR programs have equal benefits on cardiovascular risk factors and quality of life. However, similar efficacy does not necessarily translate into similar effectiveness. If patients are more likely to participate in home- vs. center-based therapy, then greater participation could lead to greater clinical effectiveness. We are therefore conducting a quasi-experimental, controlled trial at two VA medical centers to determine the comparative effectiveness of referral to home- vs. center-based CR in patients with CHD. Aim 1: Determine whether automatic referral to home- vs. center-based CR increases patient participation in CR after hospitalization for myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization. Aim 2: Among patients who choose to participate in CR, compare the effectiveness of home- vs. center-based CR on six-minute walk distance, quality of life, and healthcare expenditures. Aim 3: Determine whether the effects of home vs. center-based CR differ by age, gender, race, ethnicity, employment, socioeconomic status, social support, comorbid conditions, or patient preference. Results from this study will (a) help policy makers determine the effect of covering home CR on healthcare expenditures in patients with CHD; (b) help providers understand the potential benefits and harms of home- vs. center-based CR; and (c) help patients answer questions like, "Given my personal circumstances and preferences, which of these options will improve the outcomes most important to me".

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Effects of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation on Time to Enrollment and Functional Status in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease.
    Schopfer DW, Whooley MA, Allsup K, Pabst M, et al · · 2020 · cited 31× · PMID 32954885 · DOI 10.1161/jaha.120.016456

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Cardiac Rehabilitation

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of California, San Francisco trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02105246.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing