Physical Functioning Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | -6.67 | ± 7.64 |
| Usual Care | 13.33 | ± 12.52 |
Last reviewed · How we verify
Vet-Harts Pilot Intervention for Veterans With Coronary Heart Disease
Phase 2 trial testing Motivational Interview in Heart Disease in 12 participants. Completed in 31 October 2012.
| Lead sponsor | VA Office of Research and Development |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 2 |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | double |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 12 |
| Start date | 30 April 2012 |
| Primary completion | 30 June 2012 |
| Estimated completion | 31 October 2012 |
| Sites | 1 location across United States |
VA Office of Research and Development — full company profile →
18 and older, any sex, with Heart Disease. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Physical Functioning Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | -6.67 | ± 7.64 |
| Usual Care | 13.33 | ± 12.52 |
Role Limitations Due to Physical Health Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | -22.92 | ± 35.54 |
| Usual Care | 9.38 | ± 36.39 |
Role Limitations Due to Emotional Problems Scale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | -27.78 | ± 25.46 |
| Usual Care | 5.56 | ± 13.61 |
Energy-Fatigue Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | -5.00 | ± 42.65 |
| Usual Care | 1.67 | ± 23.49 |
Emotional Well-Being Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | -14.67 | ± 37.86 |
| Usual Care | -2.00 | ± 7.90 |
Social Functioning Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | -16.67 | ± 40.18 |
| Usual Care | -10.42 | ± 18.40 |
Pain Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | -5.00 | ± 13.23 |
| Usual Care | 14.17 | ± 13.10 |
General Health Subscale from the SF-36v. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | -5.00 | ± 18.03 |
| Usual Care | 4.17 | ± 17.15 |
Physical Limitations Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | -5.93 | ± 8.98 |
| Usual Care | 3.33 | ± 30.43 |
Angina Stability Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | 25.00 | ± 66.14 |
| Usual Care | -12.50 | ± 17.68 |
Angina Frequency Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | 20.00 | ± 43.59 |
| Usual Care | 16.67 | ± 22.51 |
Treatment Satisfaction Subscale from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interview | -3.92 | ± 33.45 |
| Usual Care | 7.84 | ± 10.95 |
The purpose of this research study is to survey patients to learn about their beliefs and behaviors related to the management of heart disease and to discuss options for making healthy lifestyle changes. From the information the investigators get from patients, the investigators hope to develop better methods for taking care of patients who have heart disease.
2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Verify or expand the search:
Trials testing the same drug.
Currently open trials in the same condition.
Trials by the same sponsor.
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT01566214.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing