18 and older, any sex, with Osteoarthritis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16Primary· Baseline, Week 16
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
6.06
± 1.23
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
5.78
± 1.36
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
5.76
± 1.32
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
5.87
± 1.30
Change at Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.91
± 1.90
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.18
± 1.90
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.28
± 1.99
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-2.42
± 2.09
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 16Primary· Baseline, Week 16
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. WOMAC physical function is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions, each scored on a NRS of 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale sc
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
6.24
± 1.45
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
5.86
± 1.51
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
5.90
± 1.22
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
5.91
± 1.36
Change at Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.76
± 1.78
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.11
± 1.99
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.23
± 1.99
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-2.35
± 2.07
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis Score at Week 16Primary· Baseline, Week 16
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Hig
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
3.39
± 0.57
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
3.28
± 0.46
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
3.43
± 0.56
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
3.37
± 0.55
Change at Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-0.41
± 0.70
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.49
± 0.74
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.61
± 0.83
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-0.63
± 0.87
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24Secondary· Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (no pa
Change at Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.30
± 1.43
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.22
± 1.52
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.21
± 1.67
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-0.86
± 1.57
Change at Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.51
± 1.55
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.76
± 1.65
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.12
± 1.70
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-1.93
± 1.71
Change at Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.63
± 1.54
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.88
± 1.68
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.22
± 1.92
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-2.34
± 1.92
Change at Week 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.81
± 1.59
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.23
± 1.82
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.50
± 2.03
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-2.42
± 2.00
Change at Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.81
± 1.91
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.11
± 2.08
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.24
± 2.23
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-2.19
± 2.16
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24Secondary· Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. WOMAC physical function is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions, each scored on a NRS of 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale sc
Change at Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.31
± 1.42
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.18
± 1.45
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.30
± 1.57
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-1.06
± 1.40
Change at Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.46
± 1.49
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.58
± 1.71
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.09
± 1.84
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-1.81
± 1.68
Change at Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.59
± 1.52
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.76
± 1.72
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.22
± 1.88
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-2.13
± 1.91
Change at Week 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.75
± 1.60
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.13
± 1.87
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.43
± 2.01
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-2.28
± 1.93
Change at Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.70
± 1.86
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.99
± 2.13
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.17
± 2.19
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-2.08
± 2.21
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24Secondary· Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Hig
Change at Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-0.36
± 0.79
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.37
± 0.65
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.40
± 0.68
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-0.28
± 0.71
Change at Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-0.40
± 0.74
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.45
± 0.63
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.65
± 0.82
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-0.54
± 0.75
Change at Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-0.37
± 0.72
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.44
± 0.70
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.71
± 0.85
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-0.66
± 0.79
Change at Week 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-0.45
± 0.80
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.52
± 0.71
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.69
± 0.78
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-0.61
± 0.76
Change at Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-0.45
± 0.77
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.46
± 0.76
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.57
± 0.86
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-0.57
± 0.91
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response; LOCFSecondary· Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
OMERACT-OARSI responder: participant has \>=50 percent (%) change and \>=2 absolute change from Baseline in either WOMAC pain or physical function subscale scores or at least 2 of the following being true: \>=20% change and \>=1 absolute change from Baseline in WOMAC pain subscale; \>=20% change and \>=1 absolute change from Baseline in the WOMAC physical function subscale; \>=20% change and \>=1 absolute change from Baseline in PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain and physical function score: 0 to 10 with higher score = worse response. PGA score: 1 = very good and 5 = very poor.
Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
44.7
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
37.2
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
43.3
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
34.5
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
51.3
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
57.1
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
65.3
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
59.3
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
57.2
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
58.3
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
68.0
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
69.7
Week 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
60.5
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
67.3
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
73.3
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
73.1
Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
57.9
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
66.7
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
66.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
72.4
Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
55.3
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
65.4
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
64.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
67.6
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16 and 24Secondary· Baseline, Week 16 and 24
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale
Week 16: Greater than 0% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
84.2
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
88.5
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
88.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
84.1
Week 16: >=10% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
73.7
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
82.7
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
76.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
77.9
Week 16: >=20% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
61.8
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
69.9
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
68.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
75.2
Week 16: >=30% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
50.0
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
54.5
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
61.3
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
66.2
Week 16: >=40% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
38.8
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
48.7
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
50.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
60.7
Week 16: >=50% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
30.9
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
35.9
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
40.0
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
49.0
Week 16: >=60% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
21.7
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
26.3
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
28.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
31.7
Week 16: >=70% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
13.2
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
17.3
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
20.0
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
19.3
Percentage of Participants With At Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score; LOCFSecondary· Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale
Week 2: At least 30% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
30.3
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
28.8
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
32.0
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
24.1
Week 2: At least 50% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
13.8
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
16.0
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
16.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
9.0
Week 2: At least 70% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
4.6
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
6.4
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
7.3
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
2.8
Week 2: At least 90% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
2.0
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
1.3
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
1.3
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
0.7
Week 4: At least 30% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
42.1
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
51.9
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
57.3
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
50.3
Week 4: At least 50% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
17.1
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
26.9
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
34.0
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
30.3
Week 4: At least 70% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
5.9
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
10.3
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
12.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
11.7
Week 4: At least 90% reduction
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
2.0
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
1.9
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
6.0
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
2.1
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis; LOCFSecondary· Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Hig
Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
5.9
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
5.8
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
4.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
5.5
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
6.6
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
3.2
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
14.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
12.4
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
5.3
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
6.4
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
18.0
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
14.5
Week 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
6.6
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
6.4
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
14.0
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
12.4
Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
4.6
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
5.8
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
14.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
16.6
Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
5.9
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
5.8
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
12.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
12.4
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis; Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)Secondary· Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Hig
Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
5.9
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
5.8
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
4.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
5.5
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
6.6
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
3.2
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
14.7
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
11.7
Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
5.3
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
6.4
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
17.3
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
13.8
Week 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
6.6
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
6.4
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
13.3
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
10.3
Week 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
4.6
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
5.8
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
14.0
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
14.5
Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
5.3
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
4.5
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
10.0
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
9.7
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24Secondary· Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Participants were asked to assess index joint (knee/hip) pain during the past 24 hours on an 0-10 point integer scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Baseline score was calculated as the mean of the scores in the index joint over the 3 days days in the initial pain assessment period and a weekly mean was calculated using the daily pain scores in the index joint within each study week. The change from Baseline was calculated using the difference between each post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score, where negative change indicated an improvement.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
6.31
± 1.39
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
6.29
± 1.30
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
6.38
± 1.48
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
6.34
± 1.31
Change at Week 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-0.55
± 1.12
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.74
± 1.10
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.22
± 1.49
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-0.96
± 1.22
Change at Week 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-0.95
± 1.43
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-0.91
± 1.40
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.28
± 1.76
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-1.03
± 1.46
Change at Week 3
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.19
± 1.65
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.19
± 1.57
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.40
± 1.73
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-1.08
± 1.58
Change at Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.28
± 1.65
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.45
± 1.70
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.77
± 1.74
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-1.44
± 1.73
Change at Week 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.38
± 1.58
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.57
± 1.75
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.88
± 1.96
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-1.69
± 1.71
Change at Week 8
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.41
± 1.64
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.62
± 1.75
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.84
± 2.00
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-1.80
± 1.83
Change at Week 10
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo + Diclofenac
-1.41
± 1.77
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
-1.79
± 1.88
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
-2.09
± 2.13
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
-2.06
± 1.82
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Reporting threshold: 2%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Placebo + Diclofenac
Serious: 8/152 (5%)
Deaths: —
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofenac
Serious: 12/157 (8%)
Deaths: —
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
Serious: 8/150 (5%)
Deaths: —
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
Serious: 10/145 (7%)
Deaths: —
Serious adverse events (32 terms)
Reaction
System
Placebo + Diclofenac
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + Diclofe…
Tanezumab 5 mg + Diclofenac
Tanezumab 10 mg + Diclofenac
Osteoarthritis
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
—
—
—
—
Osteonecrosis
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
—
—
—
—
Atrial fibrillation
Cardiac disorders
—
—
—
—
Cardiac failure
Cardiac disorders
—
—
—
—
Myocardial infarction
Cardiac disorders
—
—
—
—
Ventricular extrasystoles
Cardiac disorders
—
—
—
—
Benign familial pemphigus
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
—
—
—
—
Abdominal hernia
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
Abdominal rigidity
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
Large intestine perforation
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
Cholecystitis
Hepatobiliary disorders
—
—
—
—
Cholelithiasis
Hepatobiliary disorders
—
—
—
—
Bronchitis
Infections and infestations
—
—
—
—
Osteomyelitis
Infections and infestations
—
—
—
—
Ankle fracture
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
—
—
—
Fall
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
—
—
—
Foot fracture
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
—
—
—
Spinal column injury
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
—
—
—
Spinal fracture
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
—
—
—
Hyperkalaemia
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
—
—
—
—
Pathological fracture
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
—
—
—
—
Synovial cyst
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
—
—
—
—
Brain neoplasm
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
—
—
—
—
Cholesteatoma
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
The purpose of this study is to investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of tanezumab added on to diclofenac SR in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip currently experiencing partial benefit from, and are tolerating, diclofenac 150 mg/day therapy.
Publications & conference data
5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT00863772 — Tanezumab and Nerve Function In Arthritis Patients
· Phase 3
· terminated
NCT00809354 — Long-Term Analgesic Efficacy And Safety Of Tanezumab Alone Or In Combination With Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
· Phase 3
· terminated
NCT00809783 — Extension Study Of Tanezumab In Osteoarthritis
· Phase 3
· terminated
NCT00744471 — Tanezumab in Osteoarthritis Of The Hip
· Phase 3
· completed
NCT00733902 — Tanezumab in Osteoarthritis of the Knee
· Phase 3
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Osteoarthritis
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07404891 — Clinical Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of ALT001 in Osteoarthritis
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07118501 — A Prospective, Post-Market, Clinical Follow-up Study of the Incompass™ Total Ankle System
· recruiting
NCT06631638 — EMPHASYS Cup Positioning in THA With Non-Invasive Navigation (Velys Hip Navigation (VHN))
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07198750 — "Bimodal vs Unimodal High-Intensity Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis"
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07006714 — Preoperative Correction of Vitamin D Deficiency in Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA)
· Phase 4
· active not recruiting
Other Pfizer trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT04982848 — Korea Post Marketing Surveillance (PMS) Study of Talzenna®
· not yet recruiting
NCT06873191 — A Study to Learn More About Tukysa Once it is Out in the Korean Market
· not yet recruiting
NCT07497854 — A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine NURTEC® ODT 75 mg After it is Released Into the Markets in Korea
· not yet recruiting
NCT06507904 — A Study to Learn How Different Preparations of Osivelotor Taste and Enter the Blood With Food or Liquids or With an Anta
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT06864585 — A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine - Zavicefta in Patients With Sepsis or Loss of Kidney Function in Japan
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Pfizer
Last refreshed: 26 February 2021
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00864097.