Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT00737477: MISTRAL

A Study of Monthly Subcutaneous (SC) Mircera for Maintenance Treatment of Participants With Chronic Kidney Disease on Peritoneal Dialysis

Completed Phase 3 Results posted Last updated 23 June 2017
What this trial tests

Phase 3 trial testing Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta in Anemia in 96 participants. Completed in 31 July 2011.

Timeline
30 September 2008
Primary endpoint
31 July 2011
31 July 2011

Quick facts

Lead sponsorHoffmann-La Roche
PhasePhase 3
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment96
Start date30 September 2008
Primary completion31 July 2011
Estimated completion31 July 2011
Sites52 locations across France

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Anemia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Average Hb Value Within Target Range During the EEP Primary · Weeks 16 to 24

Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA. The average Hb during the EEP (Weeks 16 to 24) was calculated per participant and assessed against the target range. The percentage of participants who had average Hb during the EEP in the target range (10 to 12 g/dL) was determined as the primary endpoint. The 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the Pearson-Clopper method for exact confidence bounds.

GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia50.039.0 – 61.0
Percentage of Participants With Hb Values Within Target Range During the EEP Secondary · Weeks 16 to 24

During the EEP (Weeks 16 to 24), participants provided a total of three pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA. The percentage of participants who had at least one, two, or all three Hb values during the EEP in the target range (10 to 12 g/dL) was determined.

At Least One Hb Value (n=80)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia78.8
At Least Two Hb Values (n=77)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia49.4
All Three Hb Values (n=74)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia23.0
Change in Hb Value From Baseline to the EEP Secondary · Baseline and Weeks 16 to 24

Reference Hb was determined individually per participant as the average of all Hb values during a pre-treatment screening period (Weeks -4 to 0). Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA. The average Hb during the EEP (Weeks 16 to 24) was calculated per participant and assessed against the reference value. The mean change in Hb value between reference (i.e., "Baseline") Hb and the EEP average Hb was calculated and expressed in g/dL.

GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia0.4± 0.9
Time Spent in the Target Range for Hb During the EEP and the Overall Treatment Period Secondary · Weeks 16 to 24 and Weeks 0 to 48

Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA. Time spent in the target range (10 to 12 g/dL) was defined as time from first on-target Hb measurement to time of last known on-target Hb measurement, as collected during the EEP (Weeks 16 to 24) and the overall treatment period (Weeks 0 to 48). Time spent in the target range was averaged among all participants and expressed in weeks.

EEP (Weeks 16 to 24; n=80)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia5.9± 4.2
Overall Study (Weeks 0 to 48; n=94)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia22.0± 13.8
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within Plus/Minus (±) 1 g/dL of Reference Hb and Within the Target Range by Study Visit Secondary · Baseline and Weeks 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48

Reference Hb was determined individually per participant as the average of all Hb values during a pre-treatment screening period (Weeks -4 to 0). Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA. The percentage of participants who had average Hb during the EEP (Weeks 16 to 24) and follow-up (Weeks 28 to 48) in the target range (10 to 12 g/dL) and within ±1 g/dL of their individual reference Hb was determined by study visit.

Week 16 (n=80)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia37.5
Week 20 (n=76)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia35.5
Week 24 (n=75)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia44.0
Week 28 (n=73)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia39.7
Week 32 (n=72)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia44.4
Week 36 (n=68)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia51.5
Week 40 (n=65)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia44.6
Week 44 (n=63)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia44.4
Percentage of Participants With Cycles or Excursions Secondary · Weeks 4 to 44

Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA. Cycles were defined as a change in Hb greater than (\>) 1.5 g/dL lasting longer than 8 weeks. Excursions were defined as half of one full cycle, or an increase ("up" excursions) or decrease ("down" excursions) \>1.5 g/dL lasting longer than 4 weeks according to Hb measurements collected during the study. The percentage of participants with at least one cycle or excursion during Weeks 4 to 44 was calculated.

At Least One Cycle
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia5.3
At Least One Excursion
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia60.0
At Least One Up Excursion
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia46.3
At Least One Down Excursion
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia18.9
Percentage of Participants With Up Excursions Secondary · Weeks 4 to 16, Weeks 16 to 24, Weeks 24 to 44

Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA during the DAP, EEP, and follow-up. Excursions were defined as half of one full cycle, or an increase ("up" excursions) or decrease ("down" excursions) in Hb \>1.5 g/dL lasting longer than 4 weeks. The percentage of participants with at least one up excursion was calculated for Weeks 4 to 16, Weeks 16 to 24, and Weeks 24 to 44.

Weeks 4 to 16
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia31.8
Weeks 16 to 24
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia45.5
Weeks 24 to 44
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia22.7
Percentage of Participants With Down Excursions Secondary · Weeks 4 to 16, Weeks 16 to 24, Weeks 24 to 44

Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA during the DAP, EEP, and follow-up. Excursions were defined as half of one full cycle, or an increase ("up" excursions) or decrease ("down" excursions) in Hb \>1.5 g/dL lasting longer than 4 weeks. The percentage of participants with at least one down excursion was calculated for Weeks 4 to 16, Weeks 16 to 24, and Weeks 24 to 44.

Weeks 4 to 16
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia16.7
Weeks 16 to 24
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia11.1
Weeks 24 to 44
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia72.2
Percentage of Participants Who Required Any Dose Adjustment of Mircera/CERA Secondary · Weeks 4 to 20, Weeks 24 to 48, Weeks 4 to 48

Study drug administration occurred monthly during treatment (Weeks 0 to 48), which began with a pre-specified dose of Mircera/CERA according to the dose of ESA administered during the initial 4-week screening period. Subsequent doses could be adjusted on the basis of Hb levels or other modification criteria. The percentage of participants who required any dose adjustment (including decreased dose, increased dose, and dose not performed) was calculated for Weeks 4 to 20, Weeks 24 to 48, and Weeks 4 to 48.

Any Dose Adjustment, Weeks 4 to 20 (n=95)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia84.2
Decreased Dose, Weeks 4 to 20 (n=75)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia69.3
Increased Dose, Weeks 4 to 20 (n=75)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia43.3
Dose Not Performed, Weeks 4 to 20 (n=95)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia34.7
Any Dose Adjustment, Weeks 24 to 48 (n=76)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia100
Decreased Dose, Weeks 24 to 48 (n=50)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia74.0
Increased Dose, Weeks 24 to 48 (n=50)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia46.0
Dose Not Performed, Weeks 24 to 48 (n=76)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia30.3
Number of Dose Adjustments of Mircera/CERA Secondary · Weeks 4 to 20, Weeks 24 to 48, Weeks 4 to 48

Study drug administration occurred monthly during treatment (Weeks 0 to 48), which began with a pre-specified dose of Mircera/CERA according to the dose of ESA administered during the initial 4-week screening period. Subsequent doses could be adjusted on the basis of Hb levels or other modification criteria. The number of dose adjustments performed for each participant was averaged among all participants for Weeks 4 to 20, Weeks 24 to 48, and Weeks 4 to 48.

Weeks 4 to 20 (n=95)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia2.0± 1.3
Weeks 24 to 48 (n=76)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia5.6± 1.3
Weeks 4 to 48 (n=95)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia3.3± 2.0
Absolute Change in Dose of Mircera/CERA by Study Week Secondary · Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48

Study drug administration occurred monthly during treatment (Weeks 0 to 48), which began with a pre-specified dose of Mircera/CERA according to the dose of ESA administered during the initial 4-week screening period. Subsequent doses could be adjusted on the basis of Hb levels or other modification criteria. The absolute difference in dose from the previous week was calculated at each visit and averaged among all participants.

Week 4, Dose Decrease (n=25)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia25.8± 11.9
Week 4, Dose Increase (n=9)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia37.8± 17.2
Week 8, Dose Decrease (n=32)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia28.4± 12.3
Week 8, Dose Increase (n=14)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia42.9± 24.6
Week 12, Dose Decrease (n=21)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia24.5± 3.5
Week 12, Dose Increase (n=8)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia52.5± 21.7
Week 16, Dose Decrease (n=20)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia24.0± 2.6
Week 16, Dose Increase (n=8)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia47.5± 29.0
Percent Change in Dose of Mircera/CERA by Study Week Secondary · Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48

Study drug administration occurred monthly during treatment (Weeks 0 to 48), which began with a pre-specified dose of Mircera/CERA according to the dose of ESA administered during the initial 4-week screening period. Subsequent doses could be adjusted on the basis of Hb levels or other modification criteria. The percent difference in dose from the previous week was calculated at each visit as \[(current dose minus previous week dose) divided by previous week dose\] multiplied by 100, and averaged among all participants.

Week 4, Dose Decrease (n=25)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia23.7± 9.0
Week 4, Dose Increase (n=9)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia22.2± 6.7
Week 8, Dose Decrease (n=32)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia33.3± 22.2
Week 8, Dose Increase (n=14)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia21.4± 4.9
Week 12, Dose Decrease (n=21)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia30.3± 10.0
Week 12, Dose Increase (n=8)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia22.0± 2.3
Week 16, Dose Decrease (n=20)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia41.1± 14.0
Week 16, Dose Increase (n=8)
GroupValue95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia25.6± 7.7

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Continuously from Weeks -4 to 48 and/or 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 1 year overall). Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
Serious: 48/96 (50%)
Deaths:

Serious adverse events (60 terms)

ReactionSystemMircera in CKD-Related Ane…
PeritonitisGastrointestinal disorders
Peritoneal infectionInfections and infestations
SepsisInfections and infestations
General physical health deteriorationGeneral disorders
Fluid overloadMetabolism and nutrition disorders
SciaticaNervous system disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive diseaseVascular disorders
Cholecystitis acuteHepatobiliary disorders
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal strangulated herniaGastrointestinal disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal herniaGastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal polypGastrointestinal disorders
Oesophagitis haemorrhagicGastrointestinal disorders
Oesophagitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disorders
Peritoneal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders
PneumoperitoneumGastrointestinal disorders
SubileusGastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical herniaGastrointestinal disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
Acute coronary syndromeCardiac disorders
Angina unstableCardiac disorders
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders
Atrioventricular blockCardiac disorders
BradycardiaCardiac disorders
Other adverse events (5 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemMircera in CKD-Related Ane…
BronchitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
HypertensionVascular disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Peritonitis, Peritoneal infection, Sepsis, General physical health deterioration, Fluid overload, Sciatica, Peripheral arterial occlusive disease, Cholecystitis acute.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00737477 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This single-arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of monthly administration of SC Mircera for the maintenance of hemoglobin levels in participants with chronic kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis. Participants currently receiving maintenance treatment with SC erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) will receive monthly SC injections of Mircera, with the starting dose derived from the last weekly ESA they had been receiving.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Anemia

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Hoffmann-La Roche trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00737477.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing