18 and older, any sex, with Anemia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Average Hb Value Within Target Range During the EEPPrimary· Weeks 16 to 24
Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA. The average Hb during the EEP (Weeks 16 to 24) was calculated per participant and assessed against the target range. The percentage of participants who had average Hb during the EEP in the target range (10 to 12 g/dL) was determined as the primary endpoint. The 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the Pearson-Clopper method for exact confidence bounds.
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
50.0
39.0 – 61.0
Percentage of Participants With Hb Values Within Target Range During the EEPSecondary· Weeks 16 to 24
During the EEP (Weeks 16 to 24), participants provided a total of three pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA. The percentage of participants who had at least one, two, or all three Hb values during the EEP in the target range (10 to 12 g/dL) was determined.
At Least One Hb Value (n=80)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
78.8
At Least Two Hb Values (n=77)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
49.4
All Three Hb Values (n=74)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
23.0
Change in Hb Value From Baseline to the EEPSecondary· Baseline and Weeks 16 to 24
Reference Hb was determined individually per participant as the average of all Hb values during a pre-treatment screening period (Weeks -4 to 0). Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA. The average Hb during the EEP (Weeks 16 to 24) was calculated per participant and assessed against the reference value. The mean change in Hb value between reference (i.e., "Baseline") Hb and the EEP average Hb was calculated and expressed in g/dL.
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
0.4
± 0.9
Time Spent in the Target Range for Hb During the EEP and the Overall Treatment PeriodSecondary· Weeks 16 to 24 and Weeks 0 to 48
Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA. Time spent in the target range (10 to 12 g/dL) was defined as time from first on-target Hb measurement to time of last known on-target Hb measurement, as collected during the EEP (Weeks 16 to 24) and the overall treatment period (Weeks 0 to 48). Time spent in the target range was averaged among all participants and expressed in weeks.
EEP (Weeks 16 to 24; n=80)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
5.9
± 4.2
Overall Study (Weeks 0 to 48; n=94)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
22.0
± 13.8
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within Plus/Minus (±) 1 g/dL of Reference Hb and Within the Target Range by Study VisitSecondary· Baseline and Weeks 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48
Reference Hb was determined individually per participant as the average of all Hb values during a pre-treatment screening period (Weeks -4 to 0). Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA. The percentage of participants who had average Hb during the EEP (Weeks 16 to 24) and follow-up (Weeks 28 to 48) in the target range (10 to 12 g/dL) and within ±1 g/dL of their individual reference Hb was determined by study visit.
Week 16 (n=80)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
37.5
Week 20 (n=76)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
35.5
Week 24 (n=75)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
44.0
Week 28 (n=73)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
39.7
Week 32 (n=72)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
44.4
Week 36 (n=68)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
51.5
Week 40 (n=65)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
44.6
Week 44 (n=63)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
44.4
Percentage of Participants With Cycles or ExcursionsSecondary· Weeks 4 to 44
Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA. Cycles were defined as a change in Hb greater than (\>) 1.5 g/dL lasting longer than 8 weeks. Excursions were defined as half of one full cycle, or an increase ("up" excursions) or decrease ("down" excursions) \>1.5 g/dL lasting longer than 4 weeks according to Hb measurements collected during the study. The percentage of participants with at least one cycle or excursion during Weeks 4 to 44 was calculated.
At Least One Cycle
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
5.3
At Least One Excursion
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
60.0
At Least One Up Excursion
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
46.3
At Least One Down Excursion
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
18.9
Percentage of Participants With Up ExcursionsSecondary· Weeks 4 to 16, Weeks 16 to 24, Weeks 24 to 44
Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA during the DAP, EEP, and follow-up. Excursions were defined as half of one full cycle, or an increase ("up" excursions) or decrease ("down" excursions) in Hb \>1.5 g/dL lasting longer than 4 weeks. The percentage of participants with at least one up excursion was calculated for Weeks 4 to 16, Weeks 16 to 24, and Weeks 24 to 44.
Weeks 4 to 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
31.8
Weeks 16 to 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
45.5
Weeks 24 to 44
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
22.7
Percentage of Participants With Down ExcursionsSecondary· Weeks 4 to 16, Weeks 16 to 24, Weeks 24 to 44
Participants provided pre-dose blood samples for Hb monitoring while on treatment with Mircera/CERA during the DAP, EEP, and follow-up. Excursions were defined as half of one full cycle, or an increase ("up" excursions) or decrease ("down" excursions) in Hb \>1.5 g/dL lasting longer than 4 weeks. The percentage of participants with at least one down excursion was calculated for Weeks 4 to 16, Weeks 16 to 24, and Weeks 24 to 44.
Weeks 4 to 16
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
16.7
Weeks 16 to 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
11.1
Weeks 24 to 44
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
72.2
Percentage of Participants Who Required Any Dose Adjustment of Mircera/CERASecondary· Weeks 4 to 20, Weeks 24 to 48, Weeks 4 to 48
Study drug administration occurred monthly during treatment (Weeks 0 to 48), which began with a pre-specified dose of Mircera/CERA according to the dose of ESA administered during the initial 4-week screening period. Subsequent doses could be adjusted on the basis of Hb levels or other modification criteria. The percentage of participants who required any dose adjustment (including decreased dose, increased dose, and dose not performed) was calculated for Weeks 4 to 20, Weeks 24 to 48, and Weeks 4 to 48.
Any Dose Adjustment, Weeks 4 to 20 (n=95)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
84.2
Decreased Dose, Weeks 4 to 20 (n=75)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
69.3
Increased Dose, Weeks 4 to 20 (n=75)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
43.3
Dose Not Performed, Weeks 4 to 20 (n=95)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
34.7
Any Dose Adjustment, Weeks 24 to 48 (n=76)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
100
Decreased Dose, Weeks 24 to 48 (n=50)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
74.0
Increased Dose, Weeks 24 to 48 (n=50)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
46.0
Dose Not Performed, Weeks 24 to 48 (n=76)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
30.3
Number of Dose Adjustments of Mircera/CERASecondary· Weeks 4 to 20, Weeks 24 to 48, Weeks 4 to 48
Study drug administration occurred monthly during treatment (Weeks 0 to 48), which began with a pre-specified dose of Mircera/CERA according to the dose of ESA administered during the initial 4-week screening period. Subsequent doses could be adjusted on the basis of Hb levels or other modification criteria. The number of dose adjustments performed for each participant was averaged among all participants for Weeks 4 to 20, Weeks 24 to 48, and Weeks 4 to 48.
Weeks 4 to 20 (n=95)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
2.0
± 1.3
Weeks 24 to 48 (n=76)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
5.6
± 1.3
Weeks 4 to 48 (n=95)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
3.3
± 2.0
Absolute Change in Dose of Mircera/CERA by Study WeekSecondary· Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48
Study drug administration occurred monthly during treatment (Weeks 0 to 48), which began with a pre-specified dose of Mircera/CERA according to the dose of ESA administered during the initial 4-week screening period. Subsequent doses could be adjusted on the basis of Hb levels or other modification criteria. The absolute difference in dose from the previous week was calculated at each visit and averaged among all participants.
Week 4, Dose Decrease (n=25)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
25.8
± 11.9
Week 4, Dose Increase (n=9)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
37.8
± 17.2
Week 8, Dose Decrease (n=32)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
28.4
± 12.3
Week 8, Dose Increase (n=14)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
42.9
± 24.6
Week 12, Dose Decrease (n=21)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
24.5
± 3.5
Week 12, Dose Increase (n=8)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
52.5
± 21.7
Week 16, Dose Decrease (n=20)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
24.0
± 2.6
Week 16, Dose Increase (n=8)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
47.5
± 29.0
Percent Change in Dose of Mircera/CERA by Study WeekSecondary· Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48
Study drug administration occurred monthly during treatment (Weeks 0 to 48), which began with a pre-specified dose of Mircera/CERA according to the dose of ESA administered during the initial 4-week screening period. Subsequent doses could be adjusted on the basis of Hb levels or other modification criteria. The percent difference in dose from the previous week was calculated at each visit as \[(current dose minus previous week dose) divided by previous week dose\] multiplied by 100, and averaged among all participants.
Week 4, Dose Decrease (n=25)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
23.7
± 9.0
Week 4, Dose Increase (n=9)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
22.2
± 6.7
Week 8, Dose Decrease (n=32)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
33.3
± 22.2
Week 8, Dose Increase (n=14)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
21.4
± 4.9
Week 12, Dose Decrease (n=21)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
30.3
± 10.0
Week 12, Dose Increase (n=8)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
22.0
± 2.3
Week 16, Dose Decrease (n=20)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
41.1
± 14.0
Week 16, Dose Increase (n=8)
Group
Value
95% CI
Mircera in CKD-Related Anemia
25.6
± 7.7
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Continuously from Weeks -4 to 48 and/or 30 days after last dose (up to approximately 1 year overall).
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
This single-arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of monthly administration of SC Mircera for the maintenance of hemoglobin levels in participants with chronic kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis. Participants currently receiving maintenance treatment with SC erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) will receive monthly SC injections of Mircera, with the starting dose derived from the last weekly ESA they had been receiving.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Other trials of Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta
Trials testing the same drug.
NCT01519947 — A Study of The Effect of Altitude on Mircera (Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-Epoetin Beta) Dose Requirements in Participant
· Phase 4
· completed
NCT01194154 — A Study of Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-epoetin Beta (Mircera) in Participants With Chronic Kidney Disease (PRIMAVERA)
· Phase 2
· completed
NCT02547454 — An Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Mircera Treatment for Renal Anemia in Pre-dialysis Participants
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Anemia
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07422480 — A Study to Compare Elritercept With Epoetin Alfa to Treat Anemia in Adults With Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myel
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT06968936 — Long-term Outcomes Sub-Study of Preoperative Combined Iron Therapy
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07328191 — Quality of Life-Guided Transfusion in Refractory MDS or AML
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07315295 — Maximizing the Benefits of Iron in Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods for Malnourished Children in Kenya
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07400796 — Assessing Health System Readiness for Scaling Antenatal MMS in Cambodia
· recruiting
Other Hoffmann-La Roche trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07503340 — A Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity and Pharmacodynamic Effects of Subcutaneous O
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07298421 — A Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Effectiveness and Safety of Afimkibart for Induction and Maintenance Therapy in
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07059273 — A COPD Data Registry for Participants With Frequent Exacerbations
· not yet recruiting
NCT07416526 — A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effects of NXT007 Compared to Factor VIII Prophylaxis in Participants With Hemophilia A
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT05199688 — A Study To Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, And Pharmacodynamics Of Satralizumab In Pediatric
· Phase 3
· recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Hoffmann-La Roche
Last refreshed: 23 June 2017
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00737477.