Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07522424: RE-USE EP

Comparison and Analysis of Functionality, Safety, Cost-effectiveness, and Environmental Impact of Reprocessed and New Ablation Catheters in Electrophysiological Procedures.

Not yet recruiting NA Last updated 13 April 2026
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Ablation - new in Arhythmia in 200 participants. Not yet recruiting.

Timeline
30 April 2026
Primary endpoint
30 April 2027
20 May 2027

Quick facts

Lead sponsorIvan Zeljkovic
PhaseNA
StatusNot yet recruiting
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment200
Start date30 April 2026
Primary completion30 April 2027
Estimated completion20 May 2027
Sites1 location across Croatia

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Ivan Zeljkovic

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Arhythmia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This study evaluates whether re-sterilized (reprocessed) ablation catheters are as effective and safe as new ablation catheters when used for electrophysiological procedures. Adult patients scheduled for catheter ablation will be randomly assigned to undergo the procedure using either a new catheter or a re-sterilized catheter, with identical procedural techniques applied in both groups. The study will compare procedural efficiency, safety, costs, and environmental impact between the two approaches. The results may support more sustainable and cost-effective use of medical devices in cardiac electrophysiology.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07522424.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing