Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT07518524: Fast Track
Ultra Fast-Track vs Fast-Track Protocols in Off-Pump and Minimally Invasive Valve Cardiac Surgery
NA trial testing Fast Track Cardiac Anesthesia (FTCA) in Cardiac Surgery in 50 participants. Currently enrolling.
1 March 2026
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Ovest Milanese, Ospedale di Legnano |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Recruiting now |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 50 |
| Start date | 18 June 2025 |
| Primary completion | 1 March 2026 |
| Estimated completion | 15 December 2027 |
| Sites | 1 location across Italy |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Fast Track Cardiac Anesthesia (FTCA)
- Ultra Fast Track Cardiac Anesthesia (UFTCA)
Conditions studied
- Cardiac Surgery — all drugs for Cardiac Surgery →
Sponsor
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Ovest Milanese, Ospedale di Legnano
Who can join
18 and older, any sex, with Cardiac Surgery. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Fast-track cardiac anesthesia (FTCA) has gained significant popularity over the past decades due to its potential to reduce healthcare costs and optimize the use of medical resources. This approach has led anesthesiologists to reconsider the traditional model of cardiac anesthesia, known as Conventional Cardiac Anesthesia (CCA), which historically relied on the administration of high-dose opioids to ensure adequate hemodynamic stability and prolonged postoperative analgesia, thereby reducing the incidence of myocardial ischemia. One of the primary goals of fast-track cardiac anesthesia is early tracheal extubation. Increasing evidence demonstrates that early extubation is associated with a reduction in the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and overall hospital length of stay, resulting in significant cost savings without negatively affecting patients' clinical outcomes. In contrast, prolonged mechanical ventilation has been shown to have a substantial economic impact and, more importantly, is associated with higher in-hospital mortality and reduced long-term survival, including decreased five-year survival rates. The Ultra Fast Track protocol, which involves extubation directly in the operating room, is currently less commonly used. However, it may further reduce postoperative mechanical ventilation time and the incidence of pulmonary complications, potentially leading to an additional reduction in hospital length of stay. The aim of this study is to compare the Fast Track and Ultra Fast Track protocols in order to evaluate differences in the incidence of respiratory, cardiac, renal, septic, and neurological complications. Postoperative pain will also be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), as well as the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT07518524
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Cardiac Surgery
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT06968936 — Long-term Outcomes Sub-Study of Preoperative Combined Iron Therapy · NA · recruiting
- NCT07417462 — Transversus Thoracic Muscle Plane Block Versus Pectointercostal Fascial Block for Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surger · NA · recruiting
- NCT07193719 — Influence of Personalized Lung Volume Optimization Maneuver on Lung Function and Cardiac Performance in Children · Phase 1, PHASE2 · recruiting
- NCT07116343 — Intrapleural Ropivacaine Infusion in Cardiac Surgery · Phase 4 · recruiting
- NCT07354841 — Safety and Performance Evaluation of CPB Venous and Arterial Cannulas · NA · recruiting
Other Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Ovest Milanese, Ospedale di Legnano trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07496112 — Clinical Outcomes of Bioactive Glass S53P4 in Radical Mastoid Cavity Obliteration · enrolling by invitation
- NCT07433114 — Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) vs Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAP) for Loco-Regional Analgesia in Adult Patients Un · NA · completed
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07518524 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Ovest Milanese, Ospedale di Legnano
- Last refreshed: 8 April 2026
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07518524.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing