Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07477327

Is 6 Weeks Immobilization for a Chopart Injury Still State of the Art? Comparison Between Cast Immobilization Versus Functional Treatment

Not yet recruiting NA Last updated 17 March 2026
What this trial tests

NA trial testing 6 weeks cast immobilization in Foot Ankle Injuries in 70 participants. Not yet recruiting.

Timeline
1 October 2026
Primary endpoint
1 October 2027
1 October 2030

Quick facts

Lead sponsorHôpital Fribourgeois
PhaseNA
StatusNot yet recruiting
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment70
Start date1 October 2026
Primary completion1 October 2027
Estimated completion1 October 2030

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Hôpital Fribourgeois — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Foot Ankle Injuries. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Treatment Arms for Randomization 1. Restrictive treatment: Immobilization in a cast or VACOped boot (lower leg boot with ankle immobilzation) for 6 weeks. * Advantage: Provides stable conditions for fracture healing. * Disadvantage: Risk of muscle atrophy and ankle joint stiffness due to prolonged immobilization. 2. Functional treatment: Weightbearing as tolerated using a rigid-sole shoe. * Advantage: Allows early mobilization, reduces muscle atrophy, and helps maintain ankle mobility. * Disadvantage: Potential concern regarding pain, insufficient fracture stabilization, or pseudarthrosis Study Objectives This research project focuses on the treatment of Chopart fractures. In recent years, the number of diagnosed fractures following ankle sprains has increased. This rise is likely due to improved awareness of these injuries and the more frequent use of advanced imaging techniques such as CT scans (Computed Tomography). However, the optimal treatment strategy for these fractures remains unclear. Current treatment approaches range from operative management to conservative treatment with 6-8 weeks of immobilization, and more recently to functional treatment protocols. Most of the available evidence consists of case series, representing a low level of evidence. High-quality comparative studies are currently lacking. As a public hospital, Hospital Cantonal Fribourg (HFR) manages a large number of regional trauma cases, including Chopart injuries, with an incidence of approximately 50 cases per year. At present, treatment at HFR is predominantly conservative, involving 8 weeks of immobilization in a cast or a VACOped boot. While immobilization allows sufficient time for fracture healing, it may result in muscle atrophy and ankle joint stiffness. Recent literature suggests that a more functional treatment approach may lead to promising results. However, it remains unclear whether earlier weightbearing and functional rehabilitation improve overall outcomes or result in prolonged pain and increases the risk of complications. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare different non-operative treatment strategies using both patient-reported outcome measures and objective gait analysis. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate patient-reported outcomes following different non-operative treatment strategies for Chopart fractures. In addition, the study will assess differences in gait patterns between the two study arms and correlate these findings with patient-reported outcomes and quality of life. The study also aims to determine the timeline required to regain a normal gait pattern after injury. Outcome Measures The primary outcome will be patient-reported functional outcome and quality of life, assessed using a 22-item questionnaire combining the EFAS Score (European Foot and Ankle Society) and the Short Form-12 health survey. The secondary outcome will be objective gait analysis parameters.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other Hôpital Fribourgeois trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07477327.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing