Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT07446140
Evaluating the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Initial Clinical Effectiveness of Implementing a Cognitive Remediation Program Within Psychiatric Services.
NA trial testing Cognitive remediation in Severe and Persistent Mental Illness in 87 participants. Not yet recruiting.
1 January 2029
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Not yet recruiting |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | na |
| Design | single group |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 87 |
| Start date | 1 March 2026 |
| Primary completion | 1 January 2029 |
| Estimated completion | 1 March 2029 |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Cognitive remediation — full drug profile →
Conditions studied
- Severe and Persistent Mental Illness — all drugs for Severe and Persistent Mental Illness →
Sponsor
The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre — full company profile →
Who can join
18 and older, any sex, with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
What's being measured
Primary outcomes are the specific endpoints the trial is designed to prove or disprove.
-
Feasibility will be assessed using the attrition rate, with rates above 30% indicating feasibility concerns.
Time frame: Data will be collected at each measurement time point : T0 (baseline assessment), T1 (pre-intervention assessment), T2 (1 week post-intervention assessment), and T3 (three-month post-intervention follow-up assessment).
The attrition rate represents the percentage of participants who drop out during the study period. It is calculated by dividing the number of dropouts by the total number of participants and multiplying by 100. -
Program acceptability will be evaluated by assessing good therapeutic alliance. (Working Alliance Inventory Short Form (WAI-S)
Time frame: Data will be collected at each measurement time point : T0 (baseline assessment), T1 (pre-intervention assessment), T2 (1 week post-intervention assessment), and T3 (three-month post-intervention follow-up assessment).
The Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form (WAI-S) is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the quality of the therapeutic alliance, using a 5-point Likert scale. -
The increase in neurocognitive scores between T1 and T2 is expected to be greater than the change observed between T0 and T1. (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT))
Time frame: Data will be collected at each measurement time point : T0 (baseline assessment), T1 (pre-intervention assessment), T2 (1 week post-intervention assessment), and T3 (three-month post-intervention follow-up assessment).
The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) assesses verbal learning and memory. A list of 12 words drawn from three different semantic categories is orally presented to participants across three learning trials, followed by an interference task and an immediate free recall. -
Program acceptability will be evaluated by assessing good treatment adherence. (Treatment Adherence Perception Questionnaire (TAPQ)).
Time frame: Data will be collected at each measurement time point : T0 (baseline assessment), T1 (pre-intervention assessment), T2 (1 week post-intervention assessment), and T3 (three-month post-intervention follow-up assessment).
The Treatment Adherence Perception Questionnaire (TAPQ) is a 16-item self-report measure that evaluates participants' perceptions of the treatment, using a 5-point Likert scale. -
The increase in neurocognitive scores between T1 and T2 is expected to be greater than the change observed between T0 and T1. (the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)).
Time frame: Data will be collected at each measurement time point : T0 (baseline assessment), T1 (pre-intervention assessment), T2 (1 week post-intervention assessment), and T3 (three-month post-intervention follow-up assessment).
The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) is a computerized neuropsychological assessment battery used to evaluate multiple cognitive domains.
Sponsor's own description
Severe and persistent mental health disorders are associated with impairments in cognitive, emotional, and social functioning. Some of these disorders involve cognitive challenges that are likely to negatively affect quality of life. In this context, the early identification of cognitive difficulties and intervention through cognitive remediation become priority therapeutic targets to facilitate individual rehabilitation. From this perspective, the present study aims to determine the relevance of a personalized cognitive remediation program developed by neuropsychologists at Pierre-Janet Hospital, called RECAMEX, to guide its sustainable adoption and to support its implementation in other clinical settings.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT07446140
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other trials of Cognitive remediation
Trials testing the same drug.
- NCT05661448 — Promoting Cognitive Health in Schizophrenia · NA · recruiting
- NCT05690828 — Evaluation of Cognitive Management for Chemobrain in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer. · NA · active not recruiting
- NCT04033978 — Cerebral Impact of Cognitive Remediation for People Suffering From Schizophrenia · NA · terminated
- NCT03311880 — Evaluating a Cognitive Remediation Intervention for Women During the Menopausal Transition · NA · completed
- NCT03268434 — Evaluation of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT) in Outpatient Care · NA · completed
Other The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07506070 — Implementing Action-Based Cognitive Remediation for Transdiagnostic Cognitive Difficulties in a Tertiary Mental Health H · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT06773949 — Feasibility Trial of Exercise as a Priming Strategy for rTMS Treatment in Difficult-to-Treat Depression · NA · recruiting
- NCT06152705 — Comparing the Efficacy of fMRI-Guided vs. Standard iTBS in Treating Depression · NA · recruiting
- NCT07408934 — A Pilot Trial of Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis (the Feeling Safe Programme) · NA · enrolling by invitation
- NCT06528938 — Comparing the Efficacy of Accelerated vs. Standard fMRI-guided iTBS in Treating Adolescents Depression · NA · recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07446140 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
- Last refreshed: 25 February 2026
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07446140.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing