Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT07377890
Accuracy of Digital vs Conventional Denture Impressions: An In Vivo Study
NA trial testing Digital and conventional impressions in Edentulism in 10 participants. Currently enrolling.
1 May 2026
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Recruiting now |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | na |
| Design | single group |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 10 |
| Start date | 1 October 2025 |
| Primary completion | 1 May 2026 |
| Estimated completion | 1 June 2026 |
| Sites | 1 location across United Arab Emirates |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Digital and conventional impressions
Conditions studied
- Edentulism — all drugs for Edentulism →
- Complete Dentures — all drugs for Complete Dentures →
- Digital Impression Accuracy — all drugs for Digital Impression Accuracy →
- Dental Impression Techniques — all drugs for Dental Impression Techniques →
Sponsor
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
Who can join
Adults 18 to 85, any sex, with Edentulism or Complete Dentures. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the accuracy of two denture impression techniques, digital intraoral scanning and conventional border-molded impressions, in adults who have lost all their teeth (fully edentulous patients). The main questions it aims to answer are: Is a digital intraoral scan as accurate as a conventional impression for capturing the shape of the mouth, including movable gum areas? Are repeated digital scans consistent (precise) when taken multiple times on the same patient? Researchers will compare digital impressions taken with an intraoral scanner to conventional impressions made with custom trays and border molding to see if digital scans can match the accuracy of the traditional "gold standard" method. Participants will: Attend Dubai Dental Hospital for two study visits. Have their mouth scanned three times using a digital intraoral scanner. Have a conventional impression taken using a custom tray and high-accuracy material after border molding. Provide informed consent and allow their impression data to be analyzed for accuracy.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT07377890
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Edentulism
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT07474493 — Comparing Cleaning Tools for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses · NA · recruiting
- NCT07208812 — 3D-Printed Implant Overdentures: Comparing Impression Techniques · NA · recruiting
- NCT07320729 — Accuracy of Intraoral Photogrammetry vs Optical Scanners for Immediate Full-Arch Implant Loading · NA · active not recruiting
- NCT07364006 — Accuracy of Metal Sleeve-Free Fully Guided Implant Surgery · NA · recruiting
- NCT06688669 — Examining the Effects of Removable Denture Use in Patients Over 60 Years of Age · recruiting
Other Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07073196 — Single Implant Crowns Supported by Narrow or Standard Diameter Implants in Molar Sites · NA · recruiting
- NCT07184346 — Accuracy of Centric Relation Recording: Conventional to Optical · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07164066 — Digital vs Conventional Prosthetic Rehab & Occlusal Analysis in Edentulous Patients · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT06808854 — Variable-thread Versus Standard Dental Implants for Replacing Missing Teeth · NA · recruiting
- NCT06622863 — EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL HYGIENE INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN BY AI-GENERATED VIDEOS VS. TRADITIONAL APPROACH IN PERIODONTAL PATIENTS · NA · not yet recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07377890 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
- Last refreshed: 30 January 2026
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07377890.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing