Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07346534

Reinforced Versus Conventional Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Low Rectal Cancer Resection: A Comparative Study

ENROLLING BY INVITATION NA Last updated 16 January 2026
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Reinforced Anastomotic Suturing (8-10 Interrupted Sutures) in Low Rectal Cancer in 300 participants. Enrolling by invitation.

Timeline
1 June 2022
Primary endpoint
30 December 2026
30 December 2026

Quick facts

Lead sponsorShanghai 10th People's Hospital
PhaseNA
StatusENROLLING BY INVITATION
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationnon randomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposeprevention
Enrollment300
Start date1 June 2022
Primary completion30 December 2026
Estimated completion30 December 2026
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Shanghai 10th People's Hospital

Who can join

Adults 18 to 85, any sex, with Low Rectal Cancer or Rectal Neoplasms. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Study Description This prospective, controlled clinical study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of reinforced anastomosis using 8-10 interrupted sutures versus the conventional Dixon procedure in patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection for low rectal cancer. Anastomotic leakage remains one of the most significant postoperative complications following low rectal cancer surgery, particularly in laparoscopic procedures due to limited tactile feedback and maneuverability in the pelvic cavity. Reinforcement of the anastomotic site through additional interrupted suturing may provide better mechanical strength and improved healing, potentially reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage and related morbidities. In this study, eligible patients will be assigned to receive either a conventional laparoscopic Dixon procedure or the same procedure with added reinforcement of the anastomosis using 8-10 interrupted sutures circumferentially. Perioperative outcomes including the rate of anastomotic leakage, postoperative complications, operation time, length of hospital stay, return of bowel function, and quality of life will be assessed and compared between the two groups. The study seeks to provide evidence for optimizing surgical techniques in low rectal cancer treatment and improving patient prognosis.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Low Rectal Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Shanghai 10th People's Hospital trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07346534.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing