Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07250139

Comparative Study of Ziplyft Treatment vs. Traditional Blepharoplasty for Upper Eyelid Rejuvenation

Recruiting now NA Last updated 26 November 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Ziplyft Device in Dermatochalasis of Upper Eyelid in 50 participants. Currently enrolling.

Timeline
8 December 2025
Primary endpoint
31 May 2026
30 September 2026

Quick facts

Lead sponsorOsheru Inc.
PhaseNA
StatusRecruiting now
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment50
Start date8 December 2025
Primary completion31 May 2026
Estimated completion30 September 2026
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Osheru Inc.

Who can join

35 and older, any sex, with Dermatochalasis of Upper Eyelid or Ptosis, Eyelid. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This study will compare two surgery techniques used for upper eyelid (eyelift) surgery: traditional surgery and a newer method called Ziplyft (a non-powered, hand-held clamp). This study will use a "split-face" design, meaning one eyelid will be treated with the traditional surgery method and the other with Ziplyft, allowing a direct side-by-side comparison. The objectives of the study are to compare Ziplyft treatment vs. traditional surgery by evaluating bruising, wound closure and incision, surgery case time, and subject/surgeon surveys.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07250139.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing