Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07203703

Comparing Jaw Tracking and Traditional Methods for Measuring Bite Accuracy in Patients With Teeth

Not yet recruiting NA Last updated 2 October 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Jaw Tracking Device in Jaw Tracking in 18 participants. Not yet recruiting.

Timeline
15 October 2025
Primary endpoint
15 January 2026
1 February 2026

Quick facts

Lead sponsorOmer Abdelmagid
PhaseNA
StatusNot yet recruiting
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposediagnostic
Enrollment18
Start date15 October 2025
Primary completion15 January 2026
Estimated completion1 February 2026

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Omer Abdelmagid

Who can join

Adults 18 to 60, any sex, with Jaw Tracking. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This study compares two methods used to measure how teeth come together (occlusal contacts) in patients who have natural teeth (dentate patients). The first method uses a modern jaw tracking device, while the second relies on the conventional mounting technique. The goal is to determine which method is more accurate for diagnosing bite alignment and contact points. This is a diagnostic test accuracy study, meaning it focuses on evaluating how well each technique performs in identifying the correct occlusal contacts.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07203703.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing