Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07171294

Reproducibility of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade III Hemorrhoids

Active, enrolled Last updated 3 December 2025
What this trial tests

trial testing Minimal invasive hemorrhoidectomy in Hemorrhoidectomy in 20 participants. Participants enrolled and being followed up; not accepting new ones.

Timeline
12 August 2025
Primary endpoint
31 January 2026
31 January 2026

Quick facts

Lead sponsorHospital Son Llatzer
StatusActive, enrolled
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment20
Start date12 August 2025
Primary completion31 January 2026
Estimated completion31 January 2026
Sites1 location across Spain

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Hospital Son Llatzer

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Hemorrhoidectomy or Minimal Invasive Surgery. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Hemorrhoids are vascular-elastic structures of the anal canal that contribute to continence. Their enlargement and descent lead to symptoms such as rectal bleeding and the sensation of anal swelling, known as hemorrhoidal syndrome. In advanced cases (Goligher Grade III-IV), surgery is the only effective treatment. Open excisional hemorrhoidectomy (OEH), based on the Milligan-Morgan technique, is the standard procedure. Although effective in the long term, it causes severe postoperative pain. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) employs enhanced visualization devices to improve surgical precision and reduce tissue damage. While widely used in specialties with small surgical fields, it has not yet been explored in anal surgery. Its advantages include reduced tissue injury and improved healing, although it presents a learning curve and an initially longer surgical time. The IDEAL framework evaluates surgical innovations in five stages: Idea, Development, Exploration, Evaluation, and Long-Term Study. The IDEAL phase 2a is aimed at the optimization and technical definition of surgical innovation with a focus on continuous improvement based on real clinical practice, laying the foundation for broader and more rigorous subsequent studies. Since no previous studies on the application of MIS in OEH have been found, the investigators propose a study within Stage 2A of the IDEAL model to assess the reproducibility of this technique. The investigators believe its incorporation into open excisional hemorrhoidectomy could result in less postoperative pain and faster patient recovery.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Minimal invasive hemorrhoidectomy

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Hemorrhoidectomy

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Hospital Son Llatzer trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07171294.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing