Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07150585

Effects of Irrigation Activation Systems on Postoperative Pain and Lesion Healing in Single-Visit Retreatment

Active, enrolled NA Last updated 5 September 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Ultrasonic Activation Group in Retreatment in 75 participants. Participants enrolled and being followed up; not accepting new ones.

Timeline
1 August 2024
Primary endpoint
1 June 2025
1 June 2027

Quick facts

Lead sponsorEge University
PhaseNA
StatusActive, enrolled
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingtriple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment75
Start date1 August 2024
Primary completion1 June 2025
Estimated completion1 June 2027
Sites1 location across Turkey (Türkiye)

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Ege University

Who can join

Adults 18 to 65, any sex, with Retreatment or Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

In this superiority randomized clinical trial with a parallel design, 75 asymptomatic maxillary anterior teeth with 2-5 mm periapical lesions and a history of primary root canal treatment (PRCT) at least four years earlier were included. Patients were randomly assigned, using a randomization sequence generated on www.random.org, and divided into three groups. In all patients, existing canal fillings were removed using Remover rotary file (Coltene, MicroMega) and hand files. Working lengths were determined with an apex locator and canals reshaped using the step-back technique. For the final irrigation, side-vented needles were positioned 2 mm short of the working length. Activation was performed with Ultra X (Eighteeth) in the ultrasonic group, EDDY (VDW) in the sonic group, and an Er:YAG laser (LightWalker, Fotona) in SWEEPS mode (2940 nm, 5 μs, 20 mJ, 15 Hz) in the laser group. In all groups, each irrigant (EDTA followed by NaOCl) was activated in three cycles of 20 seconds. All canals were obturated with gutta-percha and a bioceramic sealer, and restored with composite. Pain levels were recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours, and on day 7. The completed forms were collected by another independent investigator blinded to the group assignments. At the end of the treatment, periapical radiographs were obtained and recorded from all patients. Patients whose treatment was completed will be recalled at the 6th, 12th, and 24th months for follow-up periapical radiographs, and the comparison of healing among the groups will be evaluated as a secondary outcome based on changes in the PAI index.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other Ege University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07150585.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing