Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07088510

Hysteroscopic Resection Versus Manual Vacuum Aspiration for Early Pregnancy

Recruiting now NA Last updated 30 July 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Hysteroscopic resection in Miscarriage in First Trimester in 80 participants. Currently enrolling.

Timeline
31 March 2025
Primary endpoint
30 April 2027
30 April 2028

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
PhaseNA
StatusRecruiting now
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment80
Start date31 March 2025
Primary completion30 April 2027
Estimated completion30 April 2028
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Who can join

Adults 18 to 55, female only, with Miscarriage in First Trimester. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Early pregnancy loss happens when a pregnancy that is not developing properly is found on an ultrasound before 12 weeks and 6 days. This type of loss occurs in about 10% of pregnancies. There are three main ways to treat this: waiting for it to pass naturally, using medication, or having surgery. Surgery is the most effective, working 99% of the time, compared to waiting (80% effective in 8 weeks) and medication (71-84% effective). Currently, surgery involves dilation of the cervix and curettage (removal of pregnancy tissue) with suction provided either from a manual hand-held pump or a machine. For the purposes of this study, a manual vacuum aspirator (or hand-held pump) will be used with ultrasound guidance. There is also another method called hysteroscopic resection, where the doctor uses a special camera to directly see and remove any pregnancy tissue from your uterus. Patients often want the quickest way to resolve the pregnancy loss, and physicians are unsure which surgical method is the best. It's also unclear if one type of surgery causes less scar tissue inside the uterus, affects the ability to test the tissue for genetic issues, or impacts how soon a patient can start fertility treatments again. This study aims to find out if hysteroscopic resection provides faster resolution and creates less scar tissue compared to the manual vacuum aspiration.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Miscarriage in First Trimester

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07088510.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing