Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT07064616: PEACE

Pulsed Field Ablation vs. Cryoballoon Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Recruiting now NA Last updated 26 August 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Catheter ablation using pulsed field ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in 300 participants. Currently enrolling.

Timeline
25 June 2025
Primary endpoint
31 December 2027
31 December 2028

Quick facts

Lead sponsorKitasato University
PhaseNA
StatusRecruiting now
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment300
Start date25 June 2025
Primary completion31 December 2027
Estimated completion31 December 2028
Sites1 location across Japan

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Kitasato University

Who can join

Adults 18 to 85, any sex, with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This clinical study is being conducted to compare two different treatment methods for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), a common heart rhythm disorder. Atrial fibrillation occurs when the upper chambers of the heart (the atria) beat rapidly and irregularly. This can lead to symptoms like palpitations, shortness of breath, or fatigue, and it increases the risk of stroke or heart failure. Persistent atrial fibrillation means that the irregular heart rhythm continues and does not stop on its own. Treatment often includes a procedure called catheter ablation, where special instruments are used to create small scars in the heart to block the abnormal electrical signals causing the arrhythmia. Currently, two main types of catheter ablation are used in Japan: Cryoballoon Ablation: A technique that uses extreme cold to create scars and isolate the pulmonary veins, which are often the source of the irregular signals. Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA): A newer technique that uses very short bursts of electrical energy to target the heart tissue, with the aim of reducing damage to surrounding structures. While pulsed field ablation has been introduced in Japan recently and seems to be safe, there is limited data about how well it works compared to cryoballoon ablation, especially in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. This study aims to find out whether pulsed field ablation is as effective and safe as cryoballoon ablation for treating persistent AF.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing pulsed field ablation vs. cryoballoon ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PEACE trial).
    Fukaya H, Oikawa J, Yoshizawa T, Satoh A, et al · · 2025 · PMID 41127849 · DOI 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101819

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Kitasato University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT07064616.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing