Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06978309

EMG Response in Forearm and Neck Muscles When Comparing Surgical Techniques.

Completed Last updated 26 January 2026
What this trial tests

trial testing No Interventions in Surgical Fatigue in 9 participants. Completed in 8 September 2025.

Timeline
6 May 2025
Primary endpoint
8 September 2025
8 September 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorLancaster University
StatusCompleted
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment9
Start date6 May 2025
Primary completion8 September 2025
Estimated completion8 September 2025
Sites1 location across United Kingdom

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Lancaster University

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Surgical Fatigue. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Surgeons are performing an increasing number of minimal access procedures because these offer certain advantages including improved recovery times. However, this also results in surgeons operating for longer periods which inevitably increases the already known prevalence of work-related Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries amongst surgeons. Work-related MSK disorders account for 26 - 47.5% of illnesses and injuries due to overexertion and repetitive use, in professionals with ergonomically challenging jobs. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) is a modern technology that could help mitigate these MSK problems and thereby improve patient care. In comparison to standard laparoscopic surgery (LS), RALS offers steadier wrist movements with a reduced fulcrum effect, thus benefiting the patient. No study has compared the demands of RALS vs. LS on musculoskeletal fatigue (and subsequent injury risk). The investigators need to determine whether a career using RALS is associated with better musculoskeletal health of surgeons than standard LS when performing complex minimally invasive procedures. The study will recruit Surgeons who perform prostate and bowel surgical procedures who have experience using RALS and/or LS. Surgeons will complete a series of validated questionnaires before and after each surgery to subjectively determine musculoskeletal strain/pain and will have body composition quantified. They will be fitted with EMG (to measure muscle fatigue) whilst performing real-life surgery. Analysis of data gathered will be used to show what the short- and long- term musculoskeletal demands are and in turn determine if these are associated with changes in motor control. The researcher's postulated hypothesis is that RALS should have less musculoskeletal effects both short and long term on surgeons, therefore, highlighting the fact that the implementation of RALS should be less controversial, because in the long run, the most expensive objects in the operating room are the personnel.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of No Interventions

Trials testing the same drug.

Other Lancaster University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06978309.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing