Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06954883: AR

Augmented Reality Distraction for Reducing Pain in Pediatric Dental Procedures

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 6 January 2026
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Augmented Reality Distraction in Dental Anxiety in 60 participants. Completed in 15 August 2025.

Timeline
15 May 2025
Primary endpoint
30 July 2025
15 August 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorAssiut University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment60
Start date15 May 2025
Primary completion30 July 2025
Estimated completion15 August 2025
Sites1 location across Egypt

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Assiut University

Who can join

Adults 6 to 10, any sex, with Dental Anxiety. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Pain Score Using Wong-Baker FACES Scale Primary · Immediately after the dental extraction procedure.

Pain was assessed immediately after local anesthesia injection using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. This validated pediatric pain scale consists of six facial expressions ranging from 0 ("No pain") to 10 ("Worst pain"). Children were asked to select the face that best represented their pain experience, which was then converted into a numeric score. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD)and were compared between study arms.

GroupValue95% CI
AR-based Distraction2.3± 1.2
Standard Care (Tell-Show-Do Technique)4.5± 1.3
1. Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale Secondary · Immediately after the dental extraction procedure.

Dental anxiety was assessed immediately post-procedure using the Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale (CFSS-DS). The CFSS-DS is a validated 15-item questionnaire scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not afraid to 5 = very afraid; total range 15-75, higher scores = greater anxiety). Values were compared between study arms (Augmented Reality distraction vs. Standard Care)

GroupValue95% CI
AR-based Distraction17.6± 3.9
Standard Care (Tell-Show-Do Technique)26.8± 4.5
Heart Rate as Physiological Indicator of Anxiety Secondary · Immediately post-procedure

Heart rate was measured in beats per minute (bpm) using a finger pulse oximeter (CMS 50DL, China). Measurements were taken while the child was seated in the dental chair immediately post-procedure as a physiological indicator of anxiety. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The outcome was defined as the post-procedure heart rate value, compared between study arms.

GroupValue95% CI
AR-based Distraction80± 8
Standard Care (Tell-Show-Do Technique)89± 10

Sponsor's own description

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of augmented reality (AR) as a distraction technique to reduce procedural pain and anxiety in children aged 6-10 undergoing primary tooth extraction. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either AR distraction via VR goggles or standard tell-show-do behavior management during local anesthesia administration and extraction.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Dental Anxiety

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Assiut University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06954883.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing