Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT06833099
The Prediction of Recurrence Lumbar Disc Herniation At L5-S1 Level Through Machine Learning Models Based on Endoscopic Discectomy Via the Interlaminar Approach
trial testing VAS Point and Imaging Examination in Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation in 309 participants. Completed in 1 November 2024.
31 May 2024
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Jinyu Chen |
|---|---|
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | OBSERVATIONAL |
| Enrollment | 309 |
| Start date | 1 January 2020 |
| Primary completion | 31 May 2024 |
| Estimated completion | 1 November 2024 |
| Sites | 1 location across China |
Drugs / interventions tested
- VAS Point and Imaging Examination
Conditions studied
- Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation — all drugs for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation →
Sponsor
Jinyu Chen
Who can join
Eligibility, any sex, with Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
What Was the Study About? This study focused on improving the care of patients with a specific type of back problem called lumbar disc herniation at the L5-S1 level. Doctors often treat this condition with a minimally invasive surgery known as percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID). However, sometimes the herniation (the damaged disc) can come back after surgery. The goal of this study was to develop computer models that help predict which patients might experience a recurrence of their herniated disc. Who Participated? The study reviewed the medical records of 309 patients who had undergone the PEID surgery. Out of these, 33 patients experienced a recurrence of their herniation, while 276 patients did not. What Did the Researchers Do? Data Collection: They gathered information from each patient before the surgery, including clinical details (like body weight and any health conditions such as diabetes) and imaging studies (like X-rays, CT scans, or MRIs) that show the condition of the spine. Identifying Key Risk Factors: Using a statistical method called LASSO regression, the researchers identified eight important factors that could influence whether the herniation might come back. These included factors such as body mass index (BMI), a measure related to disc height (posterior disc height index), signs of spinal canal narrowing, how long the patient had symptoms before surgery, and other health conditions. Developing Prediction Models: They then used several machine learning techniques (advanced computer methods that learn from data) to build prediction models. Two of the best-performing models were based on methods called Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). What Were the Main Findings? Key Predictors: Higher BMI and changes in the disc (as measured by the posterior disc height index) were found to be the strongest predictors of a herniation coming back after surgery. Other factors, like spinal canal narrowing and longer duration of symptoms before surgery, also played significant roles. Practical Implication: These models can help doctors identify which patients are at higher risk for recurrence. With this information, they can adjust treatment plans and follow-up care to better manage and potentially reduce the risk of the herniation coming back. Why Is This Important? For patients and their families, this study offers hope for more personalized and effective treatment plans, reducing the chances of needing additional surgeries in the future. For healthcare providers, the findings provide useful tools to improve decision-making before surgery, ensuring better long-term outcomes for patients with L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation. In summary, this research uses modern computer methods to predict the risk of recurrent disc herniation after a common minimally invasive back surgery, aiming to enhance patient care and improve surgical outcomes.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT06833099
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06833099 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Jinyu Chen
- Last refreshed: 18 February 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06833099.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing