Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06816706

Comparison of Physiological Effects of Two High-Flow Tracheal Oxygen Versus T-Piece During Spontaneous Breathing Trials

Recruiting now NA Last updated 21 March 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Modified high flow tracheal oxygen-40L/min in Critical Care in 20 participants. Currently enrolling.

Timeline
1 March 2025
Primary endpoint
30 November 2025
30 December 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorJian-Xin Zhou
PhaseNA
StatusRecruiting now
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designcrossover
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment20
Start date1 March 2025
Primary completion30 November 2025
Estimated completion30 December 2025
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Jian-Xin Zhou

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Critical Care or Oxygen Therapy. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) are essential for assessing extubation tolerance, yet optimal approaches are debated. High-flow nasal oxygen offers benefits like precise oxygen delivery, flow-related positive end-expiratory pressure generation and improved lung function. While high-flow tracheal oxygen can also be used as an SBT method, it has reduced physiological effects due to bypassing the upper airway with a more open circuit. To enhance this limitation, investigators developed a modified high-flow tracheal oxygen tube with a smaller expiratory end diameter to increase expiratory resistance and airway pressure. This is a prospective randomized crossover study that aims to compare the physiological effects of standard and modified high-flow tracheal oxygen versus T-piece during SBT.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Physiological effects of high-flow oxygen via endotracheal tube versus T-piece strategies during spontaneous breathing trials: a study protocol and statistical analysis for a single-centre randomised crossover study.
    Xu SS, Zhang RZ, An X, Miao MY, et al · · 2025 · PMID 40962338 · DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105360

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Critical Care

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Jian-Xin Zhou trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06816706.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing