Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06800235

The Effect of Computer-Aided Simulation Training on Aspiration Skills and General Efficacy Beliefs

Completed NA Last updated 29 January 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Computer-Assisted Simulation in Aspiration Skill Self-assessment in 70 participants. Completed in 20 December 2024.

Timeline
20 November 2024
Primary endpoint
20 November 2024
20 December 2024

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Beykent
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposeother
Enrollment70
Start date20 November 2024
Primary completion20 November 2024
Estimated completion20 December 2024
Sites1 location across Turkey (Türkiye)

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Beykent

Who can join

Adults 18 to 25, any sex, with Aspiration Skill Self-assessment or General Competence Belief. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Purpose This study was conducted to determine the effect of computer-aided simulation education on nursing students' aspiration skills and general competence beliefs. Research Hypotheses H1-1: Computer-aided simulation education has an effect on aspiration self-efficacy. H1-2: Computer-aided simulation education has an effect on nursing students' general competence beliefs. Method Research Design The research is a randomized controlled experimental study. Place of the Research The research was conducted with students studying in the second year of the nursing department of the faculty of health sciences of a state university in the fall semester of the 2024-2025 academic year between November 20 and December 20, 2024. The Universe and Sample of the Study The universe of the study consisted of students studying in the second year of the nursing department of the faculty of health sciences of a state university in the fall semester of the 2024-2025 academic year (N=126). The sample consisted of second year students who met the acceptance criteria of the study. Power analysis was performed to determine the number of people to be included in the study. Power analysis was calculated with the G\*Power 3.1 program in the sample calculation. The effect size was taken as 0.80 as high level according to the difference between independent groups determined by Cohen (1988). In order to exceed the 95% value in determining the power of the study; a total of 70 people should be reached, 35 in each group at a significance level of 5% and an effect size of 0.80 (df=68; t=1.668). The students were randomly assigned to the control and intervention groups. A randomization table was created using the website http://stattrek.com/statistics/random-number-generator.aspx.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other University of Beykent trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06800235.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing