Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06676462

Non-inferiority Trial Comparing visionPRO to Glidescope Video Laryngoscopes

Not yet recruiting NA Last updated 6 November 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Video laryngoscopy with visionPRO in Intubation; Difficult or Failed in 100 participants. Not yet recruiting.

Timeline
1 January 2025
Primary endpoint
31 December 2026
1 January 2027

Quick facts

Lead sponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
PhaseNA
StatusNot yet recruiting
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposeother
Enrollment100
Start date1 January 2025
Primary completion31 December 2026
Estimated completion1 January 2027

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Intubation; Difficult or Failed or Intubation Complication. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Indirect video laryngoscope tracheal intubation with the GlideScope (Verathon Inc., Bothell, USA) has become a well-established technique in emergency and clinical anaesthesia, offering first-pass intubation success rates comparable to those achieved with direct laryngoscopy. Different video laryngoscopes vary significantly in design, including blade shape, mobility, and camera operation, which can affect patient outcomes. Two video laryngoscopes with hyperangulated blades include the GlideScope (Verathon Inc., Bothell, USA) and the visionPRO (HEINE® Optotechnick, Gilching, Germany). The Glidescope comprises an external monitor connected to a medical-grade plastic handle which is compatible with reusable and disposable blades. The newer visionPro comprises a reusable anodized aluminum integrated monitor that is attached to the camera/handle which is compatible with disposable blades. The hyperangulated blade of the VisionPro is a unique combination of previously designed laryngoscope blades meant to increase performance. The introduction of this new hyperangulated blade design in the VisionPro raises the need to compare its performance against the established GlideScope. The aim of this pilot study is to generate initial data to evaluate whether the use of the visionPRO (HEINE® Optotechnick, Gilching, Germany) provides a non-inferior first-pass success rate compared with the GlideScope (Verathon Inc., Bothell, USA) in surgical patients with an expected normal airway undergoing general anaesthesia The investigators hypothesize that tracheal intubation using the HEINE visionPRO will achieve a similar frequency of failed intubation and airway complications. This study plans to recruit 100 patients.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06676462.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing