Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT06669156
Insufficient Regional Anesthesia and Conversion to General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section A Qualitative Multicenter Study
trial in Cesarean Section Complications in 30 participants. Currently enrolling.
1 February 2026
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Sygehus Lillebaelt |
|---|---|
| Status | Recruiting now |
| Study type | OBSERVATIONAL |
| Enrollment | 30 |
| Start date | 1 February 2025 |
| Primary completion | 1 February 2026 |
| Estimated completion | 1 January 2027 |
| Sites | 7 locations across Denmark |
Conditions studied
- Cesarean Section Complications — all drugs for Cesarean Section Complications →
- Cesarean Section Pain — all drugs for Cesarean Section Pain →
- Regional Anesthesia — all drugs for Regional Anesthesia →
Sponsor
Sygehus Lillebaelt — full company profile →
Who can join
18 and older, female only, with Cesarean Section Complications or Cesarean Section Pain. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Background In Denmark, approximately 20% of all children are born via cesarean section (C-section), making it the most common surgical procedure (also internationally). The recommended anesthesia for cesarean sections is regional anesthesia (spinal or epidural, "spinal anesthesia"), as it has several advantages: the woman is awake and experiences the delivery of her child, she maintains spontaneous breathing (the risk of difficult airway management is significantly higher in pregnant women), and the risk of aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs (which is clearly increased in pregnant women) is reduced. Furthermore, regional anesthesia can contribute to early postoperative pain management to some extent. With spinal anesthesia, most women feel pressure and touch but no pain during the cesarean section. However, some women do experience pain during the procedure, necessitating a change in the plan. If inadequate anesthesia is detected before the surgery begins, one may choose (depending on, for example, the urgency of the cesarean) to administer renewed regional anesthesia (typically an epidural). However, if the woman first experiences pain after the surgery has commenced, it is necessary to place her under general anesthesia for the remainder of the procedure. Experience shows that this process can be challenging, and there are frequent examples in clinical practice of inappropriate courses of action, where women have experienced unacceptable pain during their cesarean sections without being placed under general anesthesia. It is difficult to obtain an exact figure on how many women experience inadequate anesthesia during cesarean sections under regional anesthesia, as not all cases are recognized or followed up on. Studies indicate that up to 12% experience pain during a cesarean section. The consequences of inadequate anesthesia for cesarean sections can be quite significant for women, including impaired bonding with the child, poorer establishment of breastfeeding, increased risk of postpartum reactions and post-traumatic stress, as well as (anecdotally) the risk of women opting out of future pregnancies, as they may be reluctant to subject themselves to a similar situation again. Aim The aim of this study is to investigate how women experience insufficient regional anesthesia during cesarean sections that require conversion to general anesthesia. The focus is on exploring the factors that contribute positively and negatively to the woman's experience in this situation. Method Qualitative study in six Danish hospitals. Inclusion criteria: * Women undergoing elective or emergency cesarean section, aged over 17 years * Regional (spinal or epidural or combined epidural-spinal) anesthesia converted to general anesthesia intraoperatively (i.e., after surgery has commenced) due to insufficient regional anesthesia (i.e., not for obstetric indications, such as in cases of difficult fetal extraction) Exclusion criteria: * Does not speak Danish or English * Does not wish to participate The woman will be contacted for the first time on day 1 or 2 after the cesarean section (before she is discharged from the hospital). She will be informed about the project and invited to participate. As a potential project participant, she is entitled to a 24-hour consideration period, and if desired, a new contact will be arranged for the following day. If she wishes to participate, she will be contacted again after 3 months. At this time, she will receive a call to schedule a follow-up telephone interview within a few days. This will take place as a semi-structured interview, initiated with open questions and concluded with a few more specific questions. At the end of the interview, a screening for post-traumatic stress will be conducted using the PTSD-8 tool. Follow-up interviews will be recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim. Sample Size The project encompasses all women at the participating centers who experience insufficient regional anesthesia during a cesarean section and conversion to general anesthesia during 1 year.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT06669156
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Cesarean Section Complications
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT07278037 — Trends in the Administration of Tranexamic Acid for Postpartum Hemorrhage · recruiting
- NCT05224726 — Platelet Rich Plasma for Uterine Scar · NA · recruiting
- NCT07130747 — Effect of Myofascial Release Versus Deep Friction Massage on Abdominal Recovery and Scar After Cesarean Section · NA · recruiting
- NCT05791630 — The Norwegian World Health Organisation Labour Care Guide Trial (NORWEL) · NA · recruiting
- NCT07049705 — Factors Influencing Bradycardia During Spinal Anesthesia in Obstetric Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section · active not recruiting
Other Sygehus Lillebaelt trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07134179 — Insufficient Regional Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Mothers' Experiences A Qualitative Study · not yet recruiting
- NCT05933993 — Mothers Experience of Pain Following Elective Cesarean Section. A Qualitative Study. · completed
- NCT05840367 — Mothers' Experience of Category 1 Cesarean Section · recruiting
- NCT04948892 — Presence of the Father During Hyperacute Cesarean Section in General Anesthesia · completed
- NCT04458038 — Does Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Influence the Cognitive Function · NA · unknown
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06669156 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Sygehus Lillebaelt
- Last refreshed: 27 August 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06669156.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing