Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT06668857
Quantitative Eye Movement Measurements in Patients with Acute Vestibular Syndrome
NA trial testing video-oculography in Acute Vestibular Syndrome in 75 participants. Not yet recruiting.
1 October 2027
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Alexander Tarnutzer |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Not yet recruiting |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | na |
| Design | single group |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | diagnostic |
| Enrollment | 75 |
| Start date | 1 July 2025 |
| Primary completion | 1 October 2027 |
| Estimated completion | 30 June 2028 |
Drugs / interventions tested
- video-oculography
Conditions studied
- Acute Vestibular Syndrome — all drugs for Acute Vestibular Syndrome →
- Vertigo — all drugs for Vertigo →
- Stroke Acute — all drugs for Stroke Acute →
- Acute Unilateral Vestibulopathy (AUV) — all drugs for Acute Unilateral Vestibulopathy (AUV) →
Sponsor
Alexander Tarnutzer
Who can join
18 and older, any sex, with Acute Vestibular Syndrome or Vertigo. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
BACKGROUND: A chief complaint of acute vertigo/dizziness is related to about 2.1-7.1% of all emergency department (ED) visits. About 25% of all patients with acute prolonged vertigo meeting diagnostic criteria of AVS (acute vestibular syndrome) suffer from a vertebrobasilar stroke and about 35% of these patients are initially missed. Differentiating dangerous central from more benign peripheral causes of AVS is essential. Subtle oculomotor paradigms such as HINTS (Head-Impulse, Nystagmus, Test-of-Skew) have been shown to detect central causes with high diagnostic accuracy, however, require sufficient training. Thus, identifying other bedside tests that can be reliably performed by frontline providers is essential to reduce misdiagnosis. WORKING HYPOTHESIS: By using additional oculomotor (saccades, pursuit) and pupillomotor parameters at the bedside or quantitatively, the diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing peripheral from central AVS causes can be further improved, especially in the setting when expertise for applying more sophisticated algorithms (HINTS(+), STANDING) is lacking. AIM 1: Detecting changes in oculomotor and pupillomotor responses in acutely dizzy patients and characterizing the spectrum of abnormalities in peripheral and central AVS. AIM 2: Comparing different composite oculomotor-/pupillomotor scores to identify those scores with the highest diagnostic accuracy at the bedside and quantitatively. AIM 3: Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of bedside and quantitative oculomotor and pupillomotor testing in AVS- identifying potential limitations of bedside testing. METHODS: To assess oculomotor and pupillomotor responses in patients with peripheral or central AVS and healthy controls (25 participants each) at the bedside and quantitatively by use of a Pioneer research eye tracker (PRET) system and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of individual and composite responses. EXPECTED VALUE OF THE PROJECT: The proposed project will shed more light on the value of different examination techniques in AVS for distinguishing peripheral from central causes. This is achieved by investigating oculomotor and pupillomotor parameters obtained at the bedside and quantitatively in the acute stage and at follow-up. The insights gained will likely have a direct impact on diagnostic accuracy and thus on future strategies how to evaluate acutely dizzy patients in the ED. Eventually, this may reduce the rate of misdiagnosis and may improve patients' outcome.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT06668857
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Acute Vestibular Syndrome
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT05062915 — Diagnostic Work up and Management of Acute Onset Vertigo · NA · active not recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06668857 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Alexander Tarnutzer
- Last refreshed: 31 October 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06668857.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing