Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06382363: DM-REACH

Improving T2DM Detection Using Spot cHbA1c Test

Completed NA Last updated 5 July 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing POC-cHbA1c testing in Diabetes Mellitus in 852 participants. Completed in 12 December 2023.

Timeline
11 June 2022
Primary endpoint
12 December 2023
12 December 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsorThe University of Hong Kong
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposescreening
Enrollment852
Start date11 June 2022
Primary completion12 December 2023
Estimated completion12 December 2023
Sites8 locations across Hong Kong

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

The University of Hong Kong

Who can join

45 and older, any sex, with Diabetes Mellitus or Pre-diabetes. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of active opportunistic screening using point-of-care capillary Hemoglobin-A1c (POC-cHbA1c) testing, compared to venous HbA1c (vHbA1c) testing, in improving detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among at-risk primary care patients. Design: Pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Setting: 8 public primary care clinics in Hong Kong. Participants: A minimum of 776 patients (97 per clinic) who have ≥1 risk factor for T2DM, but no known diagnosis of DM or DM screening in the past 12 months. Intervention: Participants at intervention clinics (n=4) will be offered free POC-cHbA1c testing on-site, immediately informed of test results and DM risk, and scheduled for confirmatory oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) if screened positive (i.e. HbA1c≥5.6%). Participants at control clinics will be offered free vHbA1c testing scheduled on a separate day, informed of test results and DM risk via phone, and scheduled for confirmatory OGTT if screened positive. Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes are uptake rate of POC-cHbA1c versus vHba1c testing, and difference in proportion of T2DM detected between intervention and control groups. Secondary outcomes include number-needed-to-screen to detect one more T2DM case. Data analysis: Participants' characteristics and test uptake rates will be summarized by descriptive statistics. Difference in the proportion of T2DM detected between groups will be compared using Chi-squared test. Number-needed-to screen to identify one additional patient with DM will be calculated. Expected results: A greater proportion of T2DM patients will be detected by POC-cHbA1c than vHbA1c due to a higher screening test uptake rate among the studied population.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Improving type 2 diabetes detection among at-risk individuals - comparing the effectiveness of active opportunistic screening using spot capillary-HbA1c testing and venous HbA1c testing: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
    Chan L, Yu EYT, Wan EYF, Wong SYS, et al · · 2025 · cited 1× · PMID 40165254 · DOI 10.1186/s12916-025-04007-z

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Diabetes Mellitus

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other The University of Hong Kong trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06382363.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing