Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06284174

Effectiveness of Povidone-Iodine Versus Chlorhexidine Gluconate Solutions in Reducing Microbial Contamination in Spinal Surgery Wounds During Intraoperative Soaking.

Recruiting now NA Last updated 29 May 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Povidone-iodine solution; chlorhexidine gluconate in Spine Infection in 105 participants. Currently enrolling.

Timeline
1 January 2021
Primary endpoint
31 December 2024
31 May 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorNational Cheng-Kung University Hospital
PhaseNA
StatusRecruiting now
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposeprevention
Enrollment105
Start date1 January 2021
Primary completion31 December 2024
Estimated completion31 May 2025
Sites1 location across Taiwan

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Spine Infection. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This study aims to assess the efficacy of intraoperative wound irrigation with iodine-containing and chlorhexidine-containing solutions in reducing bacterial colonization during spine surgery, and to determine which solution is more effective. Additionally, we aim to evaluate any side effects associated with the use of these two antiseptic solutions for wound irrigation.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other National Cheng-Kung University Hospital trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06284174.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing