Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06272643: EMPERATRIZ

Comparison Between Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound for Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions

Active, enrolled Last updated 13 February 2026
What this trial tests

trial testing IVUS (Intravascular Ultrasound) and OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) in Coronary Disease in 153 participants. Participants enrolled and being followed up; not accepting new ones.

Timeline
4 April 2024
Primary endpoint
20 March 2026
20 April 2026

Quick facts

Lead sponsorFundación EPIC
StatusActive, enrolled
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment153
Start date4 April 2024
Primary completion20 March 2026
Estimated completion20 April 2026
Sites18 locations across Spain

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Fundación EPIC — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Coronary Disease. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Significant coronary disease of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) is found in 4%-5% of all coronary angiography procedures. Classically, it has been determined that a significant angiographic stenosis should reach at least 50% of the vessel diameter by visual estimation, which corresponds to 75% of the vessel area. However, angiography has a number of limitations inherent to the technique and location of stenosis, and other techniques are therefore available for evaluation. Intracoronary ultrasound (IVUS) deserves, together with the pressure guidewire, special consideration in determining the severity assessment (anatomical and functional) of lesions in this location. Using IVUS the most commonly used cut-off value is 6 mm2. in ambiguous lesions of the LMCA, a MLA \>6 mm2 would indicate no revascularisation, a MLA \<4.5-5 mm2 would indicate revascularisation, and MLA values between 4.5-5 and 6 mm2 would make it advisable to use FRF/iFR to decide. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is another intracoronary imaging modality, with greater resolution and significant differences from IVUS. no MLA cut-off point with OCT has been demonstrated for the management of LMCA lesions. Due to the differences in imaging with both techniques, the thresholds established as cut-off points in IVUS cannot be extrapolated to OCT. The objective is to compare the minimal luminal area by IVUS and OCT of angiographically intermediate LCMA lesions and to assess the prognostic value of TCFA assessed by OCT.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Coronary Intravascular Imaging: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Applications, and Future Directions.
    Iuvara G, Franzino M, Carciotto G, De Ferrari T, et al · · 2025 · PMID 41303855 · DOI 10.3390/medicina61112019

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Coronary Disease

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Fundación EPIC trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06272643.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing