Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06216184

Adding Vortexing to the Maki Technique Provides no Benefit for the Diagnosis of Catheter-related Bacteremia

Completed Last updated 22 January 2024
What this trial tests

trial testing Vortexing in Catheter-related Bloodstream Infection in 136 participants. Completed in 30 September 2022.

Timeline
1 April 2022
Primary endpoint
30 September 2022
30 September 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity Hospital of Canary Islands
StatusCompleted
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment136
Start date1 April 2022
Primary completion30 September 2022
Estimated completion30 September 2022
Sites1 location across Spain

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University Hospital of Canary Islands

Who can join

Eligibility, any sex, with Catheter-related Bloodstream Infection. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The investigators wanted to determine whether the combined use of vortexing and Maki techniques provides profitability versus the Maki technique for the diagnosis of catheter tip colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Adding vortexing to the Maki technique provides no benefit for the diagnosis of catheter colonization or catheter-related bacteremia.
    Lorente L, Lecuona Fernandez M, González-Mesa A, Oliveras-Roura J, et al · · 2024 · PMID 38633472 · DOI 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i1.89085

Verify or expand the search:

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06216184.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing