Adults 18 to 25, any sex, with Food Selection. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Perceived Message EffectivenessPrimary· Survey questions administered after participant viewed each message; overall survey took up to 20 minutes
Participants will rate each message on perceived message effectiveness (PME) for encouraging participants to make the target dietary substitution. PME will be assessed with 4 items \[the text shown in brackets will be tailored to each substitution\]:
1. How much does this message discourage you from wanting to \[eat beef and pork / drink juice / drink cow's milk / drink sugary drinks\]?
2. How much does this message make \[eating beef and pork, etc.\] seem unpleasant to you?
3. How much does this message make you concerned about the effects of \[eating beef and pork, etc.\]?
4. How much does
Group
Value
95% CI
Health Messages
2.94
± .95
Environment Messages
2.83
± 1.01
Health and Environment Messages
2.98
± .93
Neutral Messages
1.69
± .98
Sponsor's own description
The aim of this study is to examine emerging adults' responses to dietary substitution messages about health, the environment, or both health and the environment.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Stanford University
Last refreshed: 12 November 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06175026.