Adults 18 to 40, any sex, with Auditory Hallucinations. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change From Baseline in Oscillatory Measure of Cognitive Control During Stimulus Evaluation in AX Version of the Continuous Performance Test (AX-CPT)Primary· Week 3 minus Week 1
Most trials in this task show letter A, then X, requiring response. Occasionally, stimuli other than A (generally called "B" stimuli) or other than X (generally, "Y" stimuli) are presented, requiring no response. Mean event-related spectral magnitude calculated between 200-500 ms after "A" and "B" stimuli in the beta band (15-25 Hz), across frontocentral EEG electrodes (Fz, FC1, FCz, FC2, Cz). Signals were averaged over electrodes, time, and frequency. Values reported here represent the mean of "A" and "B" responses.
Group
Value
95% CI
Auditory Control Enhancement (ACE)
-0.0394
± 0.0464
Sham tDCS + ACCT
0.0024
± 0.038
Change From Baseline in Oscillatory Measure of Cognitive Control During Response Preparation in A-X Version of the Continuous Performance Test (AX-CPT)Primary· Week 3 minus Week 1
Most trials in this task show letter A, then X, requiring response. Occasionally, stimuli other than A (generally called "B" stimuli) or other than X (generally, "Y" stimuli) are presented, requiring no response. Mean event-related spectral magnitude calculated between 600-1200 ms after "A" and "B" stimuli in the gamma band (30-60 Hz), across frontocentral EEG electrodes (Fz, FC1, FCz, FC2, Cz). Signals were averaged over electrodes, time, and frequency. Values reported here represent the difference between "A" and "B" responses (B minus A)).
Group
Value
95% CI
Auditory Control Enhancement (ACE)
-0.0504
± 0.0708
Sham tDCS + ACCT
-0.0075
± 0.0484
Change in Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) Modulation With AttentionPrimary· Week 3 minus Week 1
Mean evoked event-related spectral magnitude calculated between 100-500 ms after stimulus onset and 35-45 Hz in frontocentral electrodes (Fz, FC1, FCz, FC2, Cz). Magnitude is calculated as the average over electrodes, time, and frequency. These values represent the difference between signal magnitude measures in attend and ignore conditions (attend minus ignore).
Group
Value
95% CI
Auditory Control Enhancement (ACE)
0.339
± 0.328
Sham tDCS + ACCT
-0.071
± 0.113
Change in Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) Amplitude.Primary· Week 3 minus Week 1
Mean evoked event-related spectral magnitude calculated between 100-500 ms after stimulus onset and 35-45 Hz in frontocentral electrodes (Fz, FC1, FCz, FC2, Cz). Magnitude is calculated as the average over electrodes, time, and frequency. These values represent the response during ignore condition.
Group
Value
95% CI
Auditory Control Enhancement (ACE)
-0.046
± 0.054
Sham tDCS + ACCT
0.043
± 0.106
RetentionPrimary· Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Percentage of enrolled participants who completed the study
Group
Value
95% CI
Auditory Control Enhancement (ACE)
7
Sham tDCS + ACCT
5
BlindingPrimary· Week 3
Subjective forced-choice impression of treatment condition assessed by a single item on study completion questionnaire - "Which treatment condition do you think you received? ACE or sham(placebo)?" Numbers reported indicate count of participants who selected "ACE".
Group
Value
95% CI
Auditory Control Enhancement (ACE)
5
Sham tDCS + ACCT
5
AcceptabilityPrimary· Week 3
Acceptability rating on a visual analogue scale (0-100; greater = more acceptable) obtained via post-study survey.
Group
Value
95% CI
Auditory Control Enhancement (ACE)
89
± 7
Sham tDCS + ACCT
81
± 6
Change in MCCB Attention Scale ScoreSecondary· Week 3 minus Week 1
t-score (mean = 50, standard deviation= 10; greater=better) obtained on the Attention scale of the National Institute of Mental Health's Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS)- Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)
Group
Value
95% CI
Auditory Control Enhancement (ACE)
-2
± 5
Sham tDCS + ACCT
-3
± 8
Change in MCCB Processing Speed Scale ScoreSecondary· Week 3 minus Week 1
t-score (mean = 50, SD = 10; greater=better) obtained on the Processing Speed scale of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)
Group
Value
95% CI
Auditory Control Enhancement (ACE)
7
± 9
Sham tDCS + ACCT
-2
± 8
Change in Cerebral Blood Flow in Auditory Control RegionsPrimary· Week 3 minus Week 1
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) measured by pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pcASL) will be assessed in right vlPFC and left TPJ target regions
Group
Value
95% CI
Auditory Control Enhancement (ACE)
3.25
± 8.00
Sham tDCS + ACCT
8.41
± 0
Sponsor's own description
The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate neural markers of target engagement to further develop auditory control enhancement (ACE) as a novel, inexpensive, and noninvasive intervention to address treatment-refractory auditory hallucinations. Here, we will address questions about the feasibility and acceptability of ACE, as well as the degree to which ACE results in measurable engagement of biophysical and neurophysiological targets.
Participants will complete:
* Auditory Control Enhancement (ACE): Participants will be assigned by chance (such as a coin flip) into one of two groups to receive a different dosage or level of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during three sessions of cognitive training. tDCS is used to stimulate the brain for a short period of time. For tDCS one or two thin wet sponges are placed on the head and/or upper arm. The sponges will be connected to electrodes which will deliver a very weak electrical current. The Neuroelectrics Starstim 32 will be used to deliver tDCS.
* Interviews: Before and after ACE, in two separate sessions, participants will be asked questions about a) background; b) functioning in daily life and across different phases of your life and past, present and future medical records.
* Cognitive Tests: During the interview sessions, participants will also perform cognitive tests. Participants will be asked to complete computerized and pen-and-paper tests of attention, concentration, reading, and problem-solving ability.
* EEG scan: Participants will be asked to complete EEG (electroencephalography) studies before and after ACE training. EEG will be measured using the same Neuroelectrics Starstim 32 system used for tDCS. EEG measures the natural activity of the brain using small sensors placed on the scalp. These sensors use conductive gel to provide a connection suitable for recording brain activity. During EEG, participants will watch a silent video while sounds are played over headphones, or sometimes count the sounds. In addition to these auditory tasks, participants will also be asked to perform visual attention tasks, such pressing a button for a letter or image.
* Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan: Participants will also be asked to complete MRI studies before and after ACE training. An MRI is a type of brain scan that takes pictures of the brain that will later be used to create a 3D model of the brain. The MRI does not use radiation, but rather radio waves, a large magnet and a computer to create the images.
Researchers will compare individuals receiving ACE to those receiving sham tDCS during cognitive training to determine effects of ACE.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Other trials of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Trials testing the same drug.
NCT07411833 — tDCS for Stress and Burnout in Higher Education
· NA
· enrolling by invitation
NCT07158853 — Combined tDCS and Cognitive Training as an Adjunctive Treatment in Opioid Use Disorder
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07333404 — Combined tDCS and Pneumatic Compression for Recovery After a 10K Run
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07291791 — tDCS for Pain Modulation in Knee Osteoarthritis
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT07116109 — Neuromodulation + Prolonged Exposure Therapy: Evaluation of a Technology-Enhanced, Integrated Treatment for Pain and PTS
· NA
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Brian A Coffman, PhD
Last refreshed: 7 April 2026
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06155695.