Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT06073912

Implant Placement With Corticocancellous Bone Block vs Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix in Maxillary Sinus Lifting

Status unknown NA Last updated 10 October 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Open sinus lifting in Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation in 24 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 December 2023
Primary endpoint
1 April 2024
1 June 2024

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCairo University
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment24
Start date1 December 2023
Primary completion1 April 2024
Estimated completion1 June 2024

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Cairo University

Who can join

Adults 18 to 70, any sex, with Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Maxillary sinus floor elevation is a predictable and effective procedure for increasing the height of the residual bone in the posterior maxilla. The sinus lift procedure is basically performed using Conventional lateral sinus floor elevation (CLSFE) when RBH \< 5 mm. The use of autogenous corticocancellous bone block allows the simultaneous placement of an implant in the severely atrophic maxilla. Autogenous corticocancellous block will be applied in these patients to decrease the number of surgical interventions and the complications related to the surgery, without any additional risk, as well as to provide graft stabilization with the implant itself, using a mechanism similar to that of a screw and nut. Although the traditional application of sticky bone inside the sinus gives the benefit of moldable shaping and accurate fit into the recipient bony cavity which hardens and allows for implant osteotomy and installation with adequate implant stability. Limited comparative studies of both techniques had been introduced to the literature. This study is aimed to compare the quantity of bone gain after open sinus lift and augmentation using autogenous corticocancellous bone blocks from the chin area versus autogenous particulate mineralized plasmatic matrix (sticky bone) graft used as control group. The primary outcome which is amount of bone gain will be measured and secondary stability of the implant.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other Cairo University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06073912.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing