Adults 45 to 75, male only, with Colorectal Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Percentage of Participants Who Received a Colorectal Cancer Screening TestPrimary· Month 6
This measure assesses whether or not a participant received a colorectal cancer screening test since beginning the study. The date and type of screening will be verified via electronic health records. A value of "0" will be recorded if no screening test is found in the electronic health record. A value of "1" will be recorded if a screening test is found in the electronic health record. The percentage of participants with a electronic health record verified screening will be calculated from these values.
Group
Value
95% CI
CRC mHealth Intervention
2
Control Education
2
Perceived Severity of Colorectal Cancer at Month 6Secondary· Month 6
Measured using the 12-item perceived severity subscale of Green and colleagues' (2004) CRC Knowledge, Perceptions, and Screening Survey. Items are averaged to form a score ranging from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher perceived severity.
Group
Value
95% CI
CRC mHealth Intervention
2.82
± 0.76
Control Education
2.59
± 0.61
Perceived Susceptibility to Colorectal Cancer at Month 6Secondary· Month 6
Measured using the 5-item perceived susceptibility subscale of Green and colleagues' (2004) CRC Knowledge, Perceptions, and Screening Survey. Items are averaged to form a score ranging from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher perceived susceptibility.
Group
Value
95% CI
CRC mHealth Intervention
2.82
± 0.76
Control Education
2.59
± 0.61
Perceived Benefits to Colonoscopy at Month 6Secondary· Month 6
Measured using Rawl and colleagues' (2001) 5-item perceived benefits to colonoscopy scale. Items are averaged to form a score ranging from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher perceived benefits to colonoscopy.
Group
Value
95% CI
CRC mHealth Intervention
4.23
± 0.51
Control Education
4.11
± 0.54
Perceived Benefits to Stool Test at Month 6Secondary· Month 6
Measured using Rawl and colleagues' (2001) 5-item perceived benefits to fecal occult blood test scale. Items are averaged to form a score ranging from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher perceived benefits to stool tests.
Group
Value
95% CI
CRC mHealth Intervention
3.91
± 0.52
Control Education
4.06
± 0.52
Colorectal Cancer Knowledge at Month 6Secondary· Month 6
Measured using the 16-item CRC Knowledge test subsection of Green and colleagues' (2004) CRC Knowledge, Perceptions, and Screening Survey. The true/false items are scored 1 (correct) or 0 (incorrect) and summed to form a score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher scores indicate greater colorectal cancer knowledge.
Group
Value
95% CI
CRC mHealth Intervention
13.70
± 1.49
Control Education
13.17
± 1.43
Percentage of Participants Reporting Yes to Receiving a Colorectal Cancer Screening TestPrimary· baseline, 6-months
Participants responded to a multiple-choice item asking whether they had completed a recommended colorectal cancer screening (colonoscopy, FIT, FIT-DNA, virtual colonoscopy, or flexible sigmoidoscopy) in the past 6 months. Response options were Yes/No/I'm not sure.
Group
Value
95% CI
CRC mHealth Intervention
40.4
27.6 – 54.7
Control Education
17.0
8.9 – 30.1
Sponsor's own description
The goal of this clinical trial is to test a new smartphone-based program designed to help African American men get screened for colorectal cancer (CRC). The main question it aims to answer is:
° Are African American men who complete the smartphone-based program more likely to get screened for colorectal cancer than men who do not?
Participants will:
* Complete a baseline survey asking about their colorectal cancer screening history and their thoughts and beliefs about colorectal cancer and the medical system.
* Be randomized to receive the new smartphone-based program or to receive text messages containing colorectal cancer education materials designed by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). The new program sends text messages with information about colorectal cancer. Some of these text messages have links to videos that try to help men overcome anything that may stand in the way of getting screened.
* Complete a follow-up survey 6 months after the baseline survey. This survey will ask the same questions as the baseline survey.
* A medical records review will be conducted at 6 months to verify whether participants received a colorectal cancer screening test during the study period.
Researchers will compare participants who receive the new smartphone-based program to participants who receive the CDC information. The goal is to see whether the smartphone-based program increasing screening more than standard educational materials available on the internet.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07152821 — Botensilimab + Balstilimab vs Best Supportive Care as Therapy in Chemo-refractory, Unresectable, Colorectal Adenocarcino
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07353645 — KRAS Neoantigen Nanovaccine as Adjuvant Therapy for Colorectal Cancer/Pancreatic Cancer
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT07432633 — [18F]FPyQCP PET Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein in Selected Oncology Indications
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT07523919 — Functional and Respiratory Determinants of Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Outcomes
· recruiting
NCT07529301 — Functional and Respiratory Predictors of Early Postoperative Outcomes
· recruiting
Other ISA Associates, Inc. trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07011836 — Video-Based Patient Navigation to Support Cervical Cancer Screening Among Black Women
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06627439 — A Web-Based Healthy Living Training for Promotores
· NA
· completed
NCT05856149 — Mobile Diabetes Prevention for Hispanics Living in Rural Areas
· NA
· completed
NCT04863781 — Mobile Stress Management Program for African American Women
· NA
· completed
NCT05483686 — Improving HIV Outcomes Among African American Transgender Women
· NA
· completed
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by ISA Associates, Inc.
Last refreshed: 2 January 2026
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06052202.