Adults 10 to 21, any sex, with Anesthesia, Local. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Percent of Sharp (as Opposed to Dull) Sensation Over Application AreaPrimary· Day 1 at 10 minutes or 20 minutes after application of LET gel
The time to achieve anesthesia is assessed as the percent of sharp (as opposed to dull) sensation reported at 10 or 20 minutes after the application of LET gel.
Assessment of the area at 10 minutes post applications
Group
Value
95% CI
LET Gel After STAR Particle Application (Right or Left Arm)
51.6
± 29.32
LET Gel Application Without STAR Particle Application (Contralateral Arm)
82.0
± 18.6
Assessment of the area at 20 minutes post applications
Group
Value
95% CI
LET Gel After STAR Particle Application (Right or Left Arm)
55.7
± 21.8
LET Gel Application Without STAR Particle Application (Contralateral Arm)
89.0
± 15.6
Application Site Pain AssessmentPrimary· Day 1 at 10 minutes or 20 minutes after application of LET gel
The application site pain assessment was measured by using the visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 10 centimeter (cm) line with opposite endpoints representing "no pain" (coded as 0) and "pain as bad as it could possibly be" (coded as 10).
VAS at 10 minutes post-applications
Group
Value
95% CI
LET Gel After STAR Particle Application (Right or Left Arm)
3.09
± 1.83
LET Gel Application Without STAR Particle Application (Contralateral Arm)
4.09
± 1.92
VAS at 20 minutes post-applications
Group
Value
95% CI
LET Gel After STAR Particle Application (Right or Left Arm)
4.18
± 0.96
LET Gel Application Without STAR Particle Application (Contralateral Arm)
5.32
± 1.47
Change in Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL)Secondary· Day 1 at baseline and immediately after application of LET gel
The transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was measured before and after application of the STAR particles and compared to the TEWL measurement before and after application of the aloe gel.
Group
Value
95% CI
LET Gel After STAR Particle Application (Right or Left Arm)
25.0
± 8.7
LET Gel Application Without STAR Particle Application (Contralateral Arm)
14.8
± 4.3
Number of Participants With Acute Skin Reactions (ASRs)Secondary· Immediately, 1 hour, 24 hours, and 7 days after application.
Participants were observed for acute skin reactions at each application site on both arms.
Group
Value
95% CI
LET Gel After STAR Particle Application (Right or Left Arm)
0
LET Gel Application Without STAR Particle Application (Contralateral Arm)
0
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse EventsSecondary· Immediately after application, 1 hour after application and up to 1 week after application
All adverse events were documented starting immediately after lidocaine application up to 1 week after application.
Group
Value
95% CI
LET Gel After STAR Particle Application (Right or Left Arm)
0
LET Gel Application Without STAR Particle Application (Contralateral Arm)
0
Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse EventsSecondary· Immediately after application, 1 hour after application and up to 1 week after application
All serious adverse events were documented starting immediately after lidocaine application up to one week after application.
Group
Value
95% CI
LET Gel After STAR Particle Application (Right or Left Arm)
0
LET Gel Application Without STAR Particle Application (Contralateral Arm)
0
Sponsor's own description
This study is being done to answer the question: Do STAR particles (tiny pieces of ceramic with small spikes) help numbing gel (a gel that helps you feel less pain) work more quickly to provide local anesthesia or numbing in a specific area? Research participants will provide feedback on how quickly the STAR particles with the numbing gel can provide anesthesia. Participants will report their sensation at either 10 or 20 minutes after application of the numbing gel.
Publications & conference data
2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07337772 — Comparing Different Doses of Corticosteroids in Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) for Total Knee Arthroplasty
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06960317 — Empathy Through Pain Control: Lidocaine Paracervical Block for IUD Placements
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06694714 — Split Face Study of the Duration of Local Anesthetics - Fourth Arm
· Phase 4
· recruiting
NCT04706026 — A Pilot Study of Local Anesthesia for Inguinal Hernia Surgery in Older Adults
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06528288 — Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery
· NA
· recruiting
Other Emory University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06143345 — HIIT in Isolated IFG: A Proof-of-Concept Study
· NA
· withdrawn
NCT07189819 — Innovative Closed-loop Functional Electrical Stimulation Control System for Augmenting Post-stroke Gait
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06451055 — Low-calorie Diet in Isolated Impaired Fasting Glucose
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07405476 — Zanidatamab Before Surgery for the Treatment of HER2 Positive Colon and Rectal Cancer in Patients Planned for Curative I
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06708351 — Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in Women Living With HIV in Kenya, the ENHANCE LINKAge Trial
· NA
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Emory University
Last refreshed: 20 August 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT06034340.