Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05970120

A Study of Intracardiac Ultrasound With the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 20 May 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter in Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia in 30 participants. Completed in 22 February 2024.

Timeline
5 September 2023
Primary endpoint
22 February 2024
22 February 2024

Quick facts

Lead sponsorBiosense Webster, Inc.
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment30
Start date5 September 2023
Primary completion22 February 2024
Estimated completion22 February 2024
Sites3 locations across Italy, Croatia, Israel

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Biosense Webster, Inc. — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia or Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Percentage of Participants With Completion of Imaging With the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter Without Resort to Non-study Mapping Catheter Primary · At Day 1

Percentage of participants with completion of imaging with the NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter without resort to non-study mapping catheter were reported.

GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter100.088.4 – 100.0
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Related to the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter Primary · From day of index procedure (Day 1) up to 7 days

Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure related to the NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter were reported. An AE was any untoward medical experience (sign, symptom, illness, abnormal laboratory value, or other medical event) occurring to a participant during the course of the study whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE was any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, was life-threatening experience, a congenital anomaly/birth defect and ma

GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter0
Physician Assessment of Deployment, Maneuverability and Navigational Features With the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter During the Study Procedures Secondary · Day 1

Physician assessment of deployment, maneuverability and navigational features with the NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter during the study procedures were reported. The physician's feedback was collected after each study procedure for each investigational catheter through a questionnaire-based survey consisting of 15 question/sub-question. Each survey question/sub-question included a response option with a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). A score of 4 on the Likert scales indicated the catheter met expectations or was comparable to other devices. Scores of greater than or equal t

Initial catheter introduction insert catheter into sheath
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter7.06.0 – 7.0
Advance catheter into heart
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter7.06.0 – 7.0
Visualize catheter on fluoroscopy
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter7.06.0 – 7.0
Catheter performance assessment deflection control
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter7.06.0 – 7.0
Deflection reach
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter6.55.0 – 7.0
Deflection degree (bi-directional)
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter7.05.0 – 7.0
Torqability
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter7.06.0 – 7.0
Ability to maintain torque
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter7.06.0 – 7.0
Physician Assessment of Imaging Quality Acquired With the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter During the Study Procedures Secondary · Day 1

Physician assessment of imaging quality acquired with the NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter during the study procedures was reported. The quality of image acquired with NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter and displayed by CARTO software was assessed through physician's feedback on 11 question/sub-questions. Each survey question/sub-question included a response option with a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). A score of 4 on the Likert scales indicated the catheter met expectations or was comparable to other devices. Scores of \>=4 were considered satisfaction.

Contouring, value of drawing CARTOSOUND contours on 2D ultrasound image
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter7.05.0 – 7.0
On dual-plane
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter6.05.0 – 7.0
On multi-plane
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter6.05.0 – 7.0
General did CARTO integration help you to orient in multi-plane?
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter6.04.0 – 7.0
Did CARTO integration help you to orient in 4D?
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter6.04.0 – 7.0
Did image on CARTO screen change as predicted when deflecting in anterior and posterior directions?
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter6.05.0 – 7.0
How useful was the 'store clip' on CARTO?
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter6.04.0 – 7.0
Was troubleshooting information provided by the system helpful?
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter6.05.0 – 7.0
Physicians Overall Feedback on the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter During the Study Procedures Secondary · Day 1

Physicians overall feedback on the NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter during the study procedure was reported. The overall feedback on the NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter was assessed through physician's feedback on 3 question/sub-questions. Each survey question/sub-question included a response option with a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). A score of 4 on the Likert scales indicated the catheter met expectations or was comparable to other devices. Scores of \>=4 were considered satisfaction. TEE is transesophageal echocardiography.

Do you think that the NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter is an acceptable alternative to TEE?
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter7.06.0 – 7.0
What is your overall satisfaction of the NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter?
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter7.06.0 – 7.0
Would you recommend the NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter to fellow physicians?
GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter7.04.0 – 7.0
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Excluding NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter Related SAE Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Secondary · From day of index procedure (Day 1) up to 7 days

Number of SAEs excluding NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter related SAE within 7 days of index procedure was reported. AE was any untoward medical experience (sign, symptom, illness, abnormal laboratory value, or other medical event) occurring to a participant during the course of the study whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE was any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, was life-threatening experience, a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize pa

GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter20.8 – 22.1
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Related to the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter Secondary · From day of index procedure (Day 1) up to 7 days

Number of participants with non-serious adverse events within 7 days of index procedure related to the NUVISION NAV ultrasound catheter were reported. AE was any untoward medical experience (sign, symptom, illness, abnormal laboratory value, or other medical event) occurring to a participant during the course of the study whether or not related to the investigational device.

GroupValue95% CI
NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter0

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: From baseline up to 7 days after index procedure on Day 1. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter
Serious: 2/30 (7%)
Deaths: 0/30

Serious adverse events (2 terms)

ReactionSystemNUVISION NAV Ultrasound Ca…
Complete Atrioventricular blockCardiac disorders
Vascular access site pseudoaneurysmInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Other adverse events (2 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemNUVISION NAV Ultrasound Ca…
Pericardial EffusionCardiac disorders
Delayed Wound HealingInjury, poisoning and procedural complications

Most-reported serious reactions: Complete Atrioventricular block, Vascular access site pseudoaneurysm.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05970120 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to assess the performance and safety of using the investigational catheter.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Biosense Webster, Inc. trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05970120.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing