Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05967624

Prehospital Telemedicine Feasibility/Acceptability Pilot

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 19 February 2026
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Teleconsultation in Respiratory Distress Syndrome in 20 participants. Completed in 30 June 2025.

Timeline
21 June 2024
Primary endpoint
14 February 2025
30 June 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorBoston Medical Center
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposehealth services research
Enrollment20
Start date21 June 2024
Primary completion14 February 2025
Estimated completion30 June 2025
Sites2 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Boston Medical Center

Who can join

Under 17, any sex, with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Agreement in Assessment of Respiratory Distress Primary · During transport to the hospital via ambulance, up to 4 hours

Each subject will be remotely assessed by a Medical Control Physician using the HIPAA-compliant Zoom Pro web application pre-loaded on a tablet device. The remote medical control physician and the transport team member at the patient bedside in the ambulance will score the Respiratory Observation Checklist simultaneously. The range for agreement is 0 to 1.0, where 0=no agreement and 1 is perfect agreement. The following scale: 0.01-0.20=none to slight, 0.21-0.40=fair, 0.41-0.60=moderate, 0.61-0.80=substantial, 0.81-1.0=almost perfect agreement will be used.

GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group0.830.58 – 0.96
Total Usability Score Secondary · Immediately after the transport was completed, up to 48 hours

The total usability score is measured by the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ), a 21-item questionnaire which is a validated measure of all the key usability characteristics of telehealth platforms (usefulness, ease of use, effectiveness, reliability, and satisfaction). Users \[transport nurses and physicians\] rate items on 7-point Likert-scales (1=disagree to 7=agree) in 6 separate domains (usefulness, ease of use and learnability, interface quality, interaction quality, reliability, satisfaction and future use). The investigators modified this questionnaire to specifically address th

Nurses
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group6± 0.9
Physicians
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group5.7± 0.7
Video Quality Secondary · Immediately after the transport was completed, up to 48 hours

This will be measured by TUQ items #11 and #14 within the "Interaction Quality" domain. Users \[transport nurses and physicians\] will rate each item on a 7-point Likert-scale (1=disagree to 7=agree), so scores will range from 1 to 7. The mean score and standard deviation (SD) for each item will be reported. Higher scores suggest higher quality.

Nurses- "I could easily talk to the patient/clinician using the telemedicine system."
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group6.6± 0.8
Physicians- "I could easily talk to the patient/clinician using the telemedicine system".
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group6.2± 0.8
Nurses- "Using the telemedicine system, I can see the patient/clinician as if we met in person."
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group6.2± 1.3
Physicians- "Using the telemedicine system, I can see the patient/clinician as if we met in person."
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group3.9± 1.3
Audio Quality Secondary · immediately after the transport was completed, up to 48 hours

This will be measured by TUQ items #12 and #13 within the "Interaction Quality" domain. Users \[transport nurses and physicians\] will rate each item on a 7-point Likert-scale (1=disagree to 7=agree), so scores will range from 1 to 7. The mean score and SD for each item will be reported. Higher scores suggest higher quality.

Nurses- "I could hear the patient/clinician easily using the telemedicine system."
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group6.3± 1.2
Physicians- "I could hear the patient/clinician easily using the telemedicine system."
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group6.2± 0.9
Nurses- "I felt I was able to express myself effectively."
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group6.9± 0.3
Physicians- "I felt I was able to express myself effectively."
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group6.1± 0.8
Adequacy of Successful Video-call Connections Secondary · immediately after the transport was completed, up to 48 hours

The number of attempts transport team providers make to successfully connect with the medical control physician via video-call will be recorded. Adequacy of successful video-call connection is defined as ≤2 attempts to achieve a video-call connection.

Adequate (≤2 attempts)
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group14
Inadequate (>2 attempts)
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group6
Percentage of Successful Tablet Mounts Secondary · Success/failure was assessed during transport, up to 4 hours

Study investigators will note any problems with tablet mounts in the ambulance cabin (e.g., location makes call activation difficult), as well as specific qualitative comments from participants regarding tablet mount strategy. If no problems are noted the tablet mount will be considered successful and the percentage of successful table mounts will be reported.

Successful
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group100
Not successful
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group0
Percentage of Calls With Adequate Video Quality for Assessment Secondary · during ambulance transport, up to 4 hours

This will be measured as the proportion of video-calls where clinicians are able to observe all ten items on the Respiratory Observation Checklist. This checklist tool has been previously validated for rapid, reliable assessment of children by teleconsultants in emergency settings. Medical control physicians will score 9 observable signs and a global assessment of respiratory distress dichotomously (present/absent).

Optimal video quality for assessment
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group33.3
Video quality not optimal for assessment
GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group66.7
Time to Arrival at Referring Facility Secondary · up to 240 minutes

This is the time interval (minutes) from when BCH receives the patient transport request from the referring facility to the time the transport team arrives at the referring facility. This will be abstracted from transport records.

GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group66.050.0 – 78.5
Scene Time Secondary · up to 240 minutes

This is the time interval (minutes) from when the BCH transport team arrives at the referring facility to when the transport team leaves the referring facility. This will be abstracted from transport records.

GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group51.542.0 – 56.0
Time to Arrival at Destination Facility Secondary · up to 240 minutes

This is the time interval (minutes) from when the BCH transport team leaves the referring facility to the time of arrival at BCH/BMC (the destination facility). This will be abstracted from transport records.

GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group58.549.0 – 70.5
Total Transport Time Secondary · up to 240 minutes

This time interval encompasses the time from when the transport team is dispatched to the referring facility to when they arrive at the destination (receiving facility). This will be abstracted from transport records.

GroupValue95% CI
Teleconsultation Group173.5159.0 – 202.5

Sponsor's own description

Teleconsultation, or the use of video telecommunications technology to deliver expert recommendations for care remotely, has been used to improve the safety and quality of emergency care for children in hospital-based acute care settings by providing real-time access to remote pediatric physician experts. Whether extending teleconsultation as a patient safety intervention to emergency medical systems (EMS) outside hospitals can similarly benefit sick and injured children in the community is unknown. Advances in mobile technology have made teleconsultation more accessible and affordable for EMS systems. However, this intervention has been underutilized by EMS partially due to the lack of prehospital research supporting its efficacy for pediatric applications. In prior simulation studies, the investigators found high intervention acceptance among key stakeholder groups (pediatric emergency physicians and paramedics), and demonstrated that it was feasible to integrate video communication into prehospital clinical workflows involving critical care delivery in high-risk pediatric scenarios. These initial simulation studies were conducted in a controlled prehospital setting in static ambulances using infant simulator manikins to minimize risk to children and providers. Demonstrating feasibility and acceptability with real children in moving ambulances is the next step to build the necessary evidence base to support future planned prehospital efficacy trials with children. The investigators hypothesize that remote respiratory assessment of children by medical control physicians (expert physicians) using a mobile teleconsultation platform is acceptable to users (physicians and transport providers), and technically feasible in real transports.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Teleconsultation

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Boston Medical Center trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05967624.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing